Advertisement

Protocols

  • Elina Moustaira
Chapter

Abstract

Another theory about dealing with international insolvencies—implemented already, in specific cases—that has been proposed is the contractualist theory. According to that, parties may choose the regime that will govern an international insolvency.

References

  1. Ali S, Wang Kwok JK (2011) After Lehman: international response to financial disputes – a focus on Hong Kong. Richmond J Glob Law Bus 10:151–177Google Scholar
  2. Ayotte K, Skeel DA Jr (2010) Bankruptcy or Bailouts? J Corp Law 35:469–498Google Scholar
  3. Busch P, Remmert A, Rüntz S, Vallender H (2010) Kommunikation zwischen Gerichten in grenzüberschreitenden Insolvenzen – Was geht und was nicht geht. Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz und Sanierungsrecht, pp 417–430Google Scholar
  4. Butler HN, Macey JR (1997) The myth of competition in the dual banking system. Cornell Law Rev 73:677–718Google Scholar
  5. Davidoff SM, Zaring D (2009) Regulation by deal: the government’s response to the financial crisis. Adm Law Rev 61:463–541Google Scholar
  6. Eidenmüller H (2001) Der nationale und der internationale Insolvenzverwaltungsvertrag. Zeitschrift für Zivilprozessrecht, pp 3–36Google Scholar
  7. Flaschen ED, Silverman RJ (1998) Cross-border insolvency cooperation protocols. Tex Int Law J 33:587Google Scholar
  8. Hashmall AM (2010) After the fall: a new framework to regulate “Too Big to Fail” non-bank financial institutions. N Y Univ Law Rev 85:829–866Google Scholar
  9. Homan M (2001) An insolvency practitioner’s perspective. In: Bridge M, Stevens R (eds) Cross-border security and insolvency. Oxford University Press, pp 243–255Google Scholar
  10. Kirshner J (2018) International bankruptcy. The challenge of insolvency in a global economy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee E (2013) Investor protection in Lehman Brothers’ insolvency litigation. J Comp Law 7:284–306Google Scholar
  12. Levitin A (2009) The crisis without a face: emerging narratives of the financial crisis. Miami Law Rev 63:999–1010Google Scholar
  13. Lubben SJ (2004) Railroad receiverships and modern bankruptcy theory. Cornell Law Rev 89:1420–1475Google Scholar
  14. Lubben SJ (2011) Financial institutions in bankruptcy. Seattle Univ Law Rev 34:1259–1278Google Scholar
  15. Lubben SJ (2017) Lehman’s derivative portfolio. In: Faber D, Vermunt N (eds) Bank failure: lessons from Lehman Brothers. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=22698234
  16. Lubben SJ (2018) A functional analysis of SIFI insolvency. Tex Law Rev 96:1377–1402Google Scholar
  17. Lubben SJ, Pei Woo S (2014) Reconceptualizing Lehman. Tex Int Law J 49:295–325Google Scholar
  18. Mannan M (2016) Are Bangladesh, India and Pakistan ready to adopt the UNCITRAL model law on cross-border insolvency? Int Insolv Rev 25:195–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McAlister LS (2008) The inefficiencies of exclusion: the importance of including insurance companies in the Bankruptcy Code. Emory Bankruptcy Dev J 24:129–158Google Scholar
  20. McDermott MA, Turetsky DM (2011) Restructuring large, systemically-important, financial companies: an analysis of the orderly liquidation authority, Title II of the Dodd-Frank wall street reform and consumer protection act. Am Bankruptcy Inst Law Rev 19:401–451Google Scholar
  21. Mevorach I (2010) Towards a consensus on the treatment of enterprise groups in insolvency. Cardozo J Int Comp Law 18:359–423Google Scholar
  22. Mevorach I (2014) Cross-border insolvency of enterprise groups: the choice of law challenge. Brooklyn J Corp Financ Commer Law 9:226–249Google Scholar
  23. Miguens HJ (2018) El derecho internacional privado de la insolvencia en Argentina. Propuestas de reforma “de lege lata” y “de lege ferenda” para Argentina y el MERCOSUR. Editorial Académica Española, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  24. Moustaira EN (2002) Insolvency proceedings in the European Union Member States [in Greek]. Elliniki Dikaiosyni 43:1569–1578Google Scholar
  25. Nana CN (2012) In Re Lehman Brothers international (Europe): positivism or the Rigour of Pedantry? Int Insolv Rev 21:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okamoto KS (2009) After the bailout: regulating systemic moral hazard. UCLA Law Rev 57:183–236Google Scholar
  27. Paulus CG (1998) Protokolle – ein anderer Zugang zur Abwicklung grenzüberschreitender Insolvenzen. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, pp 977–982Google Scholar
  28. Queirolo I, Dominelli S (2017) Cooperation between authorities and insolvency office holders. In: Queirolo I, Dominelli S (eds) European and national perspectives on the application of the European insolvency regulation. Aracne editrice, Roma, pp 117–185Google Scholar
  29. Sarra J (2008) Maidum’s challenge, legal and governance issues in dealing with cross-border business enterprise group insolvencies. Int Insolv Rev 17:73–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sexton A (2012) Current problems and trends in the administration of transnational insolvencies involving enterprise groups: the mixed record of protocols, the UNCITRAL model insolvency law and the EU insolvency regulation. Chicago J Int Law 12:811–840Google Scholar
  31. Shaaban Masoud B (2014) The context for cross-border insolvency law reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int Insolv Rev 23:181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veneziano A (2004) Il risanamento dell’impresa in crisi. Problemi e soluzioni nell’ottica dell’insolvenza transfrontaliera, Aracne, RomaGoogle Scholar
  33. Warren E, Westbrook JL (2005) Contracting out of bankruptcy: an empirical intervention. Harv Law Rev 118:1197–1254Google Scholar
  34. Wattermoli D (2010) Chapter 11 y tutela de ls acreedores (Anotaciones al caso Lehman Brothers). ADCo 19:159–185Google Scholar
  35. Westbrook JL (1996) The lessons of Maxwell communication. Fordham Law Rev 64:2531–2541Google Scholar
  36. Westbrook JL (2006) Multinational financial distress: the last hurrah of territorialism. Tex Int Law J 41:321–337Google Scholar
  37. Wouters N, Raykin A (2013) Corporate group cross-border insolvencies between the United States & European Union: legal & economic developments. Emory Bankruptcy Dev J 29:387–423Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Moustaira
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations