Advertisement

Influences: Legal Transplants

  • Elina Moustaira
Chapter

Abstract

National laws are shaped by many influences. History and culture are among the strongest influences. National insolvency laws, including private international law rules on insolvency, follow the same path. Only here, the influence of economic theories (and of law and economics, during the last decades) is even stronger. Still, economic analysis of law may be considered as part of the culture, in the broad sense, where culture is the way of living of each society. Even jurists who deny the direct relation of law with culture cannot avoid searching for reasons that lead countries to different decisions about their laws, to different laws.

References

  1. Anapolsky JM, Woods JF (2013) Pitfalls in Brazilian bankruptcy law for international bond investors. J Bus Technol Law 8:397–450Google Scholar
  2. Armour J, Cheffins B, Skeel D Jr (2002) Corporate ownership structure and the evolution of bankruptcy law: lessons from the United Kingdom. Vanderbilt Law Rev 55:1699–1785Google Scholar
  3. Arner DW, Booth CD, Lejot P, Hsu BFC (2007) Property rights, collateral, creditor rights, and insolvency in East Asia. Tex Int Law J 42:515–559Google Scholar
  4. Arsenault S (2008) The westernization of Chinese bankruptcy: an examination of China’s new corporate bankruptcy law through the lens of the UNCITRAL legislative guide to insolvency law. Penn State Int Law Rev 27:45–87Google Scholar
  5. Baeza Ovalle JG (2011) Naturaleza juridical del proceso concursal. Revista Chilena de Derecho 38:33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campana Filho PF (2009) The legal framework for cross-border insolvency in Brazil. Houst J Int Law 32:97–151Google Scholar
  7. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC (2006) Negotiating globalization: global scripts and intermediation in the construction of Asian insolvency regimes. Law Soc Inq 31:521–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciuro Caldani MA (1994) Notas para la compresión capitalista del Derecho Comercial (aportes para la Filosofía del Derecho Comercial). Revista de Filosofía Jurídica y Filosofía Social 18:31–32Google Scholar
  9. Colombo G, Kaye R, Tamer Langen J, Lutkus S, Shirley J, Turetsky D (2017) Cross-border insolvency in Brazil: a case for the model law. Available at: www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/congress/Papers_for_Congress/117-COLOMBO_KAYE_LANGEN_LUTKUS_SHIRLEY_and_TURETSKY-_Cross_Border_Insolvency_in_Brazil.pdf
  10. de Assumpção Alves AF, da Fonseca Rocha RV (2016) Insolvência Transnational e Direito Falimentar Brasileiro. Revista EMERJ, Rio de Janeiro 19:9–65Google Scholar
  11. Gao S, Wang Z (2017) The U.S. reorganization regime in the Chinese mirror: legal transplantation and obstructed efficiency. Am Bankruptcy Law J 91:139–176Google Scholar
  12. Godwin A (2007) A lengthy stay? The impact of the PRC enterprise bankruptcy law on the rights of secured creditors. Univ N S W Law J 30:755–773Google Scholar
  13. Godwin A (2012) Corporate rescue in Asia – trends and challenges. Sydn Law Rev 34:163–187Google Scholar
  14. Gong X (2011) When Hong Kong becomes SAR, is the Mainland ready? Problems of judgments recognition in cross-border insolvency matters. Int Insolv Rev 20:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong X (2013) To recognise or not to recognise? Comparative study of Lehman brothers cases in Mainland China and Taiwan. Int Corp Rescue 10:240–247Google Scholar
  16. Gong X (2018) China’s insolvency law and interregional cooperation. Comparative perspectives from China and the EU. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Guseva Y (2014) KGB’s legacy: transplanting efficient financial infrastructures without efficiency. Univ Pa J Int Law 36:525–649Google Scholar
  18. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG (2007) The recursivity of law: global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. Am J Soc 112:1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang Y (2013) The curious case of inactive bankruptcy practice in China: a comparative study of U.S. and Chinese bankruptcy law. Northwest J Int Law Bus 34:559–582Google Scholar
  20. Kanda H, Milhaupt CJ (2003) Re-examining legal transplants: the director’s fiduciary duty in Japanese corporate law. Am J Comp Law 51:887–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kargman ST (2012) Emerging economies and cross-border insolvency regimes: missing BRICs in the international insolvency architecture (Part I). Insolv Restruct Int 6:8–15Google Scholar
  22. Lee EH (2011) The reorganization process under China’s corporate bankruptcy system. Int Lawyer 45:939–974Google Scholar
  23. Lee EH (2015a) Comparing Hong Kong and Chinese insolvency laws and their cross-border complexities. J Comp Law 9:259–280Google Scholar
  24. Lee EH (2015b) Legal pluralism, institutionalism, and judicial recognition of Hong Kong-China cross-border insolvency judgments. Hong Kong Law J 45:331–350Google Scholar
  25. Lee EH (2015c) Problems of judicial recognition and enforcement in cross-border insolvency matters between Hong Kong and Mainland China. Am J Comp Law 63:439–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee EH, Ho K (2010) China’s new enterprise bankruptcy law – a great leap forward, but just how far? Int Insolv Rev 19:145–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leno ND (2015) Rwanda legal framework on insolvency: problems and proposals for reform. Int Insolv Rev 24:122–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li X, Tu G (2018) Recent developments in recognition of and assistance to foreign insolvency representatives under the Hong Kong Common Law. Int Insolv Rev 27:32–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin S (2018) The empirical studies of China’s enterprise bankruptcy law: problems and improvements. Int Insolv Rev 27:77–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Locatelli F (2008) International trade and insolvency law: is the UNCITRAL model law on cross-border insolvency an answer for Brazil? (An economic analysis of its benefits on international trade). Law Bus Rev Am 14:313–345Google Scholar
  31. Locatelli F (2016) International insolvency and economic law. The legal and economic benefits of the UNCITRAL model law for international trade & Brazil. Lambert Academic Publishing, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin N (2003) Common-law bankruptcy systems: similarities and differences. Am Bankruptcy Inst Law Rev 11:367Google Scholar
  33. Martin N (2005) The role of history and culture in developing bankruptcy and insolvency systems: the perils of legal transplantation. Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev 28:1–77Google Scholar
  34. Miguens HJ (2018) El derecho internacional privado de la insolvencia en Argentina. Propuestas de reforma “de lege lata” y “de lege ferenda” para Argentina y el MERCOSUR. Editorial Académica Española, MauritiusGoogle Scholar
  35. Moustaira EN (1992) The equality of creditors in international bankruptcy law [in Greek]. Ant.N. Sakkoulas Publishers, Athens/KomotiniGoogle Scholar
  36. Moustaira EN (2012) Comparative law [in Greek]. Nomiki Bibliothiki, AthensGoogle Scholar
  37. Moustaira EN (2013) Juridical influences in the frame of comparative law. Sakkoulas Publications, Athens/ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  38. Ng KH (2009) The common law in two voices. Language, law & the post-colonial predicament in Hong Kong. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parry R, Gao N (2018) The future direction of China’s cross-border insolvency laws, related issues and potential problems. Int Insolv Rev 27:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qi L (2008) The corporate reorganization regime under China’s new enterprise bankruptcy law. Int Insolv Rev 17:13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ren Y (2011) The “control model” in Chinese bankruptcy reorganization law and practice. Am Bankruptcy Law J 85:177–194Google Scholar
  42. Roux Azevedo LA, Fragoso Bauch LA (2017) Limitations of Brazilian law regarding cross-border insolvency. Financier Worldwide. Available at: https://www.financierworldwide.com/limitations-of-brazilian-law-regarding-cross-border-insolvency/#.WbOcCNSLTs0
  43. Ruskola T (2000) Conceptualising corporations and kinship: comparative law and development theory in a Chinese perspective. Stanford Law Rev 52:1599–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scotti L (2006) Armonización legislativa en materia de insolvencia internacional de los grupos económicos: ¿una asignatura pendiente para el MERCOSUR? (Tesina de Maestría) Argentina: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Available at: www.derecho.uba.ar/investigacion/investigadores/scotti-insolvencia-internacional-de-los-grupos-economicos.pdf
  45. Scotti L (2007) La Insolvencia Internacional a la Luz del Derecho internacional privado Argentino de Fuente Interna. Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones “Ambrosio L. Giorgia” Universidad de Buenos Aires 1:156–191Google Scholar
  46. Smaliukas A (2015) Insolvency of group of companies in the scope of the new EIR: Lithuanian perspective. Int Insolv Law Rev:379–382Google Scholar
  47. Steele S, Godwin A, Jin C, Han C, Ren Y, Chi W (2017) Trends and developments in Chinese insolvency law: the first decade of the PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3049685
  48. Tang ZS (2012) Effectiveness of exclusive jurisdiction clauses in the Chinese courts – a pragmatic study. Int Comp Law Q 61:459–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Telles J (2010) Breve estudio comparativo del derecho concursal Español y Brasileño. Anuario Facultad de Derecho – Universidad de Alcalá III:463–475Google Scholar
  50. Tomasic R, Zhang Z (2012) From global convergence in China’s enterprise bankruptcy law 2006 to divergent interpretation: corporate reorganization in China. J Chin Leg Stud 12:295–332Google Scholar
  51. Vásquez MV, Darío Acevedo-Prada R (2014) Análisis de la regulación sobre insolvencia transfronteriza en América Latina: Argentina y Venezuela. Revista de investigaciones en Derecho y Ciencias Políticas Universidad La Gran Colombia:104–114Google Scholar
  52. Wei C, Chen Y (2018) The predicament of bank creditors in Chinese bankruptcy and the way out. Int Insolv Rev 27:110–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang X, Smart P (2006) Development of regional conflict of laws: on the arrangement of mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between Mainland China and Hong Kong SAR. Hong Kong Law J 36:553–584Google Scholar
  54. Zhu G (2002) Inter-regional conflict of laws under “One Country, Two Systems”: revisiting Chinese legal theories and Chinese and Hong Kong Law, with special reference to judicial assistance. Hong Kong Law J 32:615–676Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Moustaira
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations