Advertisement

Insolvency: International Insolvency

  • Elina Moustaira
Chapter

Abstract

Insolvency laws often—if not always—reflect the times and the conditions of life in every part of the world. Economy has an important role to play in insolvency law’s structure and choices, nowadays—or had it always? The particularities of countries and their legal cultures are also reflected in their insolvency laws.

References

  1. Almaskari BJ (2016) Towards legal certainty: European cross-border insolvency law and multinational corporate groups. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester School of Law. Available at: https://lra.le.ac.uk/bitstream/2381/39163/1/2016AlmaskariBJPhD.pdf
  2. Altman J (2011) A test case in international bankruptcy protocols: the Lehman brothers insolvency. San Diego Int Law J 12:463–495Google Scholar
  3. Anderson K (2000) The cross-border insolvency paradigm: a defence of the modified universal approach considering the Japanese experience. Univ Pa J Int Econ Law 21:679–779Google Scholar
  4. Berends AJ (1998) UNCITRAL model law on cross-border insolvency: a comprehensive overview. Tulane J Int Comp Law 6:309–400Google Scholar
  5. Block-Lieb S (2018) Reaching to restructure across borders (without over-reaching), even after brexit. Am Bankruptcy Law J 92:1–52Google Scholar
  6. Bookman PK (2017) The unsung virtues of global forum shopping. Notre Dame Law Rev 92:579–635Google Scholar
  7. Bufford SL (2005) Global venue controls are coming: a reply to Professor LoPucki. Am Bankruptcy Law J 79:105–141Google Scholar
  8. Clark LM/Goldstein K (2011) Sacred cows: how to care for secured creditors’ rights in cross-border bankruptcies. Tex Int Law J 46: pp. 513-558Google Scholar
  9. Coburn A (2012) The growth of bankruptcy tourism in the United Kingdom. Insolv Intell 25:8–11Google Scholar
  10. Fletcher IF (2005) Insolvency in private international law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Fletcher I (2011) “L’enfer, c’est les autres”: evolving approaches to the treatment of security rights in cross-border insolvency. Tex Int Law J 46:489–512Google Scholar
  12. Frade C (2012) Bankruptcy, stigma and rehabilitation. ERA Forum 13:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrido JM (2011) No two snowflakes the same: the distributional question in international bankruptcies. Tex Int Law J 46:459–488Google Scholar
  14. Guzman A (2000) International bankruptcy: in defense of universalism. Mich Law Rev 98:2177–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janger EJ (2007) Universal proceduralism. Brooklyn J Int Law 32:819–849Google Scholar
  16. Janger EJ (2010) Virtual territoriality. Columbia J Transnatl Law 48:401–441Google Scholar
  17. Janger EJ (2011) Reciprocal comity. Tex Int Law J 46:441–458Google Scholar
  18. Kammel AJ (2008) The law and economics of corporate insolvency – some thoughts. In: Omar P (ed) International insolvency law. Themes and perspectives. Routledge, London and New York, pp 61–79Google Scholar
  19. Kipnis AM (2008) Beyond UNCITRAL: alternatives to universality in transnational insolvency. Denver J Int Law Policy 36:155–189Google Scholar
  20. Klerman D/Reilly G (2016) Forum selling. South Calif Law Rev 89: pp 241-314Google Scholar
  21. LoPucki LM (1999) Cooperation in international bankruptcy: a post-universalist approach. Cornell Law Rev 84:696–762Google Scholar
  22. LoPucki LM (2000) The case for cooperative territoriality in international bankruptcy. Mich Law Rev 98:2216–2251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LoPucki L (2005) Courting failure: how competition for big cases is corrupting the bankruptcy courts. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason R (2008) Cross-border insolvency law: where private international law and insolvency law meet. In: Omar P (ed) International insolvency law. Themes and perspectives. Routledge, London and New York, pp 27–60Google Scholar
  25. McCormack G (2009) Jurisdiction competition and forum shopping in insolvency proceedings. Camb Law J 68:169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCormack G (2014) Bankruptcy forum shopping: the UK and US as venues of choice for foreign companies. Int Comp Law Q 63:815–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mevorach I (2014) Cross-border insolvency of enterprise groups: the choice of law challenge. Brooklyn J Corp Financ Commer Law 9:226–249Google Scholar
  28. Mevorach I (2018a) The future of cross-border insolvency. Overcoming biases and closing gaps. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Mevorach I (2018b) Modified universalism as customary international law. Tex Law Rev 96:1403–1436Google Scholar
  30. Michaels R (2008) Private and public international law: German view on global issues. J Priv Int Law 4:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moss G (2007) Group insolvency – choice of forum and law: the European experience under the influence of English pragmatism. Brooklyn J Int Law 32:1005–1018Google Scholar
  32. Moustaira EN (1992) The equality of creditors in international bankruptcy law [in Greek]. Ant.N. Sakkoulas Publishers, Athens/KomotiniGoogle Scholar
  33. Moustaira EN (1995) Forum Non Conveniens. Equity in the frame of legality [in Greek]. Ant.N. Sakkoulas Publishers, Athens/KomotiniGoogle Scholar
  34. Moustaira EN (1996) The evolution of private international law in the USA. Tradition – Revolution – Counter-Revolution [in Greek]. AthensGoogle Scholar
  35. Mucciarelli F (2013) The unavoidable persistence of forum shopping in European insolvency law. CEFIN. Working Paper No 36. Available at: http://www.cefin.unimore.it/?q=webfm_send/186
  36. Paulus CG (2016) Gutwetter-Insolvenzrecht vs. Schlectwetter-Insolvenzrecht: Über die ökonomischen Grundbedingungen des Insolvenzrechts. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht:1657–1663Google Scholar
  37. Pérez Ragone, Á.J./Martínez Benavides, P. (2015) Del sobreendeudamiento a la insolvencia: Fase de crisis del deudor desde el derecho comparado europeo. Revista Chilena de Derecho 42: pp. 93-121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pottow JAE (2005) Procedural incrementalism: a model for international bankrutpcy. Va J Int Law 45:935–1015Google Scholar
  39. Pottow JAE (2006) Greed and pride in international bankruptcy: the problems of and proposed solutions to “local interests”. Mich Law Rev 104:1899–1949Google Scholar
  40. Pottow JAE (2011) A new role for secondary proceedings in international bankruptcies. Tex Int Law J 46:579–599Google Scholar
  41. Rasmussen R (2000) Resolving transnational insolvencies through private ordering. Mich Law Rev 98:2252–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasmussen R (2007) Where are all the transnational bankruptcies?: The puzzling case for universalism. Brooklyn J Int Law 32:983–1003Google Scholar
  43. Ringe W-G (2017) Insolvency forum shopping, revisited. Hamburg Law Rev:38–58Google Scholar
  44. Szydlo M (2010) Prevention of forum shopping in European insolvency law. Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 11:253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tung F (2001) Is international bankruptcy possible? Mich J Int Law 23:31–102Google Scholar
  46. Waldron J (2006) Foreign law and the modern Ius Gentium. Harv Law Rev 119:129–147Google Scholar
  47. Westbrook JL (1991a) Theory and pragmatism in global insolvencies: choice of law and choice of forum. Am Bankruptcy Law J 65:457–490Google Scholar
  48. Westbrook JL (1991b) Choice of avoidance law in global insolvencies. Brooklyn J Int Law 17:499–538Google Scholar
  49. Westbrook JL (1998) Universal priorities. Tex Int Law J 33:27–45Google Scholar
  50. Westbrook JL (2000) A global solution to multinational default. Mich Law Rev 98:2276–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westbrook JL (2007) Locating the eye of the financial storm. Brooklyn J Int Law 32:1019–1040Google Scholar
  52. Westbrook JL (2010) A comment on universal proceduralism. Columbia J Transnatl Law 48:503–518Google Scholar
  53. Westbrook JL (2011) Breaking away: local priorities and global assets. Tex Int Law J 46:601–622Google Scholar
  54. Westbrook JL (2015) The present and future of multinational insolvency. In: Parry R, Omar PJ (eds) International insolvency law: future perspectives. INSOL Europe, Nottingham/Paris, pp 1–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Moustaira
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations