Advertisement

Geoecological Risk Management in Gazprom dobycha Yamburg LLC

  • Vladimir N. Bashkin
  • Rauf V. Galiulin
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Pollution book series (EPOL, volume 28)

Abstract

This chapter provides examples of geoecological risk management in the gas production company Gazprom dobycha Yamburg LLC, a subsidiary of PJSC Gazprom, which includes creation of regional and sectorial systems of environmental management in the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug [District], Russia, as well as management of the risk of operation of gas production facilities, consisting of geographic information and production and technical units, management of the industrial safety of production facilities, management of reduction of the amount of industrial emissions into the atmosphere, assessment of the transformation of natural complexes of the cryolithozone, management of restoration of disturbed lands, management of the geoecological safety of production facilities in the development of new hydrocarbon fields, and assessment of geodynamic hazards in the design and construction of gas pipelines from new hydrocarbon fields.

Keywords

Geoecological risk management Regional and operational systems Gas production company Gazprom dobycha Yamburg LLC Emissions Cryolithozone Geodynamic hazard 

References

  1. Andreev, O. P., Stavkin, G. P., Levinzon, I. L., Perepelkin, I. B., & Lobastova, S. A. (2003). Protection and restoration of lands and landscapes of far north at gas production. Ecology and the Industry of Russia, 6, 4–9.Google Scholar
  2. Andreev, O. P., Mazanov, S. V., Akhmedsafin, S. K., Arabsky, A. K., Ishkov, A. G., Rusakov, S. I., & Yarygin, G. A. (2010). The solution of problems of ecological safety at development of the first gas fields of Ob–Taz Bay. Science and Technology in the Gas Industry, 4, 32–38.Google Scholar
  3. Andreev, O. P., Bashkin, V. N., Galiulin, R. V., Arabsky, A. K., & Makliuk, O. V. (2011). Solution of geoecological risks problem in the gas industry. Survey information. Moscow: Gazprom VNIIGAZ. 78 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Arabsky, A. K., Minigulov, R. M., Raykevich, M. I., Raykevich, S. I., Minigulov, S. R., & Fokina, L. M. (2005). Technologies of reduction of emission of nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere at arrangement and operation of the polar OGCF. Environment Protection in an Oilgas Complex, 2, 9–11.Google Scholar
  5. Arabsky, A. K., Bashkin, V. N., & Galiulin, R. V. (2015). Ecological risk challenge at Gazprom dobycha Yamburg LLC. Open Ecology Journal, 8(Suppl 1-M13), 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arabsky, A. K., Arno, O. B., Baltabaev, S. G., Serebryakov, E. P., Lebedev, M. S., & Lebedeva, E. T. (2017). Technology of risk management of emergency situations on the production facilities and transport of gas of Yamburg OGCF connected with impact of forces of a frosty swell outing on the pile bases. Issues of Risk Analysis, 14(2), 84–91.Google Scholar
  7. Bashkin, V. N., Arno, O. B., Arabsky, A. K., Barsukov, P. A., Priputina I. V., & Galiulin, R. V. (2012). Retrospective and forecast of geoecological situation on the gas condensate fields of the far north. Moscow: Gazprom VNIIGAZ. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Ishkov, A. G., Andreev, O. P., Arabsky, A. K., Yarygin, G. A., Khastina, A. S., & Bayukin, M. V. (2010). The basic principles of creation of regionally-sectorial system of management of environmental protection. Environment Protection in an Oilgas Complex, 4, 4–9.Google Scholar
  9. Ishkov, A. G., Yarygin, G. A., Kuzmin, I. O., Lukyanov, O. V., & Farafonov, A. S. (2011). Assessment of modern geodynamic danger at design and construction of the main pipelines. Science and Technology in the Gas Industry, 1, 66–71.Google Scholar
  10. Kornienko, S. G., & Yakubson, K. I. (2010). Characteristic of anthropogenic impact on natural complexes of Taz Peninsula. Gas Industry, 4, 41–44.Google Scholar
  11. Kornienko, S. G., Yakubson, K. I., & Maslennikov, V. V. (2005). Studying of transformations of natural complexes of oilgas-bearing areas of a cryolithozone according of space survey data. Science and Technology in the Gas Industry, 3, 71–77.Google Scholar
  12. Markelov, V. A., Andreev, O. P., Kobylkin, D. N., Arabsky, A. K., Arno O. B., Tsybulsky, P. G., Bashkin, V. N., Kazak, A. S., & Galiulin, R. V. (2013). Gas Industry sustainable development. Moscow: Nedra. 211 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Raykevich, S. I., & Minigulov, R. M. (2007). Technologies of reduction of emission of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere when developing oil and gas fields. Science and Technology in the Gas Industry, 2, 8–15.Google Scholar
  14. Salikhov, Z. S., Andreev, O. P., Arabsky, A. K., Kondratiev, S. D., Pavlunin, V. B., & Stavkin, G. P. (2006). The system of management of risk of operation of gas-field constructions in geocryologic conditions of the Arctic and the Yamal Peninsula. Science and Technology in the Gas Industry, 3, 18–25.Google Scholar
  15. Salikhov, Z. S., Mazanov, S. V., Kumushbaev, A. M., & Kozlov, V. M. (2010). Operating experience of hazardous production facilities of “Gazprom dobycha Yamburg” LLC in the conditions of far north. Gas Industry, 8, 74–77.Google Scholar
  16. Vergeles, S. P., Bukhtoyarov, B. N., Olimpiev, I. V., & Kiselevsky, E. V. (2009). Experience of introduction of geoinformation technologies in “Gazprom dobycha Yamburg” LLC. Science and Technology in the Gas Industry, 2, 48–57.Google Scholar
  17. Yunusov, R. R., Shevkunov, S. N., Dedovets, S. A., Ushakov, S. N., Lyats, K. G., & Samoylov, A. P. (2008). Low-tonnage installations on production of methanol in the gas regions of the far north. Gas Chemistry, 1, 58–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir N. Bashkin
    • 1
  • Rauf V. Galiulin
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science RASPushchino, The Moscow RegionRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Basic Biological Problems RASPushchino, The Moscow RegionRussia

Personalised recommendations