Advertisement

Variability

  • Ina Wunn
  • Davina Grojnowski
Chapter
Part of the New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion book series (NASR, volume 6)

Abstract

Within religions, communication processes and the connected coupling of diverging opinions regarding beliefs, religious requirements, and actions (cult, ritual) result in different spectrums of opinions which are represented by more or less independent religious communities. The opinions within such a community can diverge, must prove themselves in the religious discourse, and can be transmitted and enforced successfully.

Keywords

Set of beliefs, rules, and behaviours Communities Varieties 

References

  1. Becking, B. (1998). Babylonisches Exil. In RGG 4, Vol. 1 (pp.1044–1045). Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, D. (2004). A New Introduction to Islam. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bultmann, R. (1960). Jesus Christ and Mythology. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  4. Corbin, H. (2006). History of Islamic philosophy. London, New York, Bahrain: Paul Kegan. French Edition: Corbin, P. (1964). Histoire de la Philosophie Islamique. (trans: Sherrard, L.) London, New York, Bahrain: Paul Kegan.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. (1872). The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th edition. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  6. Ehrman, B. D. (1993). The Orthodox corruption of scripture: the effect of early Christological controversies on the text of the New Testament. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Elior, R. (2004). Men and women: gender, Judaism and democracy. R Elior (Ed.) Jerusalem et al.: Urim Publ.Google Scholar
  8. Ferguson, E. (2002). Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon. In L. M. McDonald & J. A. Sanders (Ed.), The Canon Debate. Hendrickson Publishers, pp. 302–303.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman, M. (2008). Rome & Jerusalem. The Clash of Ancient Civilizations. London: Penguin, pp. 483–511.Google Scholar
  10. Haldon, J. F. (2016). The empire that would not die. The paradox of eastern roman survival. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Halm, H. (1991). Das Reich des Mahdi. Der Aufstieg der Fatimiden. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  12. Halm, H. (1996). The empire of the Mahdi. The rise of the Fatimids. (transl. M. Bonner). Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill.Google Scholar
  13. Halm, H. (2004). Shi’ism. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Halm, H. (2007). The Shiites. A short history. Princeton: Marcus Wiener Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Hassan, R. (Spring 1985). Messianism and Islam. In Journal of Ecumenical Studies, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 261–291.Google Scholar
  16. Heather, P. (2005). The fall of the Roman Empire. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Holt, P. M. (1970). Mahdist state in the Sudan. 1881–98. A study of Its origins, development and overthrow. 2nd edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Howard-Johnston, J. (2010). The Sasanian’s Strategic Dilemma. In H. Börm & J. Wiesehöfer (Eds.) Commutatio et contentio. Studies in the late Roman, Sasanian, and early Islamic Near East (pp.37–70). Düsseldorf: Wellem Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Kaegi, W. E. (1992). Byzantium and the Early Islamic Conquests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. King, K. L. (2006). The secret revelation of John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kloft, H (2010). Mysterienkulte der Antike. Götter, Menschen, Rituale. 4th edition. München, C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  22. Kosack, W. (2014). Geschichte der Gnosis in Antike, Urchristentum und Islam. Berlin: Christoph Brunner.Google Scholar
  23. Krupp, M. (1995). Der Talmud. Eine Einführung in die Grundschrift des Judentums mit ausgewählten Texten. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
  24. Linné, K. v. (1735). Systema Naturae. Leiden: Johan Wilhelm de Groot.Google Scholar
  25. Lohse, B. (2011). Epochen der Dogmengeschichte. Berlin: Lit, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
  26. Madelung, W. (1997). The succession to Muhammad. A study of the early caliphate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maier, J. (1992). Geschichte der jüdischen Religion. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder.Google Scholar
  28. Marjanen, A. (2005). Montanism. Egalitarian ecstatic “New Prophecy”. In A. Marjanen & P. Luomanen (Eds.), A companion to second-century Christian “Heretics” (pp.185–212). Leiden, Boston: BrillGoogle Scholar
  29. Marjanen, A. & Luomanen, P. (2008) (Ed.), A companion to second-century Christian “Heretics”. Leiden: Boston, Brill.Google Scholar
  30. Markschies, Ch. (1998). Kerinth: Wer war er und was lehrte er? In Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum No. 41 (pp. 48–76). Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Markschies, Ch. (2002). Montanismus. RGG 4 vol. 5 (pp. 1471–1473). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, p. 1472.Google Scholar
  32. Mayr, E. (1966). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mohammad Ali Amir-Moezzi, M. (2000). Savoir c’est pouvoir. Exégèses et implications du miracle dans l’imamisme ancien. In D. Aigle (Ed.), Miracle et Karāma. Hagiographies médiévales comparées. Brepols, Turnhout, 2000. S. 251–286.Google Scholar
  34. Moll, S. (2010). The arch-heretic Marcion. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nasr, S. H. & Leaman, O. (1996). History of Islamic Philosophy. Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Nicolle, D. (1994). Yarmuk 636 AD. The Muslim conquest of Syria. London: Osprey.Google Scholar
  37. Powell, M A (2009). Introducing the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Rappaport, R.A. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge U.K. et al.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transforms human evolution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schnelle, U. (1898). Neues Testament. 2. Sammlung und Kanonisierung. In RGG 4, Vol 1. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 1417–1424.Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, S. (2001). Judentum I. Exil bis zur arabischen Eroberung. In RGG 4 vol. 4 (pp.610–618). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  42. Smart, N. (1992). The World’s Religions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stausberg, M. (2002). Die Religion Zarathustras Vol. 1. Geschichte, Gegenwart, Rituale. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  44. Stolz, F. (1999). Christentum I. Religionswissenschaftlich. In RGG 4 Vol. 2 (pp.183–196). Tübingen, Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
  45. Tabbernee, W. (2009). Prophets and gravestones: An imaginative history of Montanists and other early Christians. Peabody, MA: HendricksonGoogle Scholar
  46. Takim, L. M. (2006). The Heirs of the Prophet: Charisma and religious authority in Shi’ite Islam. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, J. (2012). The Essenes, the scrolls, and the Dead Sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. von Soden, H.O. A. M. R. U. (1927). Christentum II. Geschichtliche Entwicklung. In RGG 2 Vol. 1 (pp.1537–1549). Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.Google Scholar
  49. Wallace, A. R. (1858). Note on the theory of permanent and geographical varieties. In The Zoologist: a popular miscellany of natural history 16, 5887-5888.Google Scholar
  50. Watt, M & Marmura, M (1995). Der Islam II. Politische Entwicklungen und theologische Konzepte. Stuttgart et al.: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  51. Watt, M. & Welch, A. T. (1980). Der Islam I. Mohammed und die Frühzeit – Recht – Islamisches Leben. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  52. Widengren, G. (1965). Die Religionen Irans. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  53. Zeller, D. (2002). Christentum I. Konsolidierung in der 2./3. Generation. In D. Zeller (Ed.). Christentum I. Von den Anfängen bis zur Konstantinischen Wende (pp.124.222). Stuttgart, Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ina Wunn
    • 1
  • Davina Grojnowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyLeibniz University of HanoverHanoverGermany
  2. 2.Formerly King’s CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations