Advertisement

Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov Theory

  • Walid Younes
  • Daniel Marc Gogny
  • Jean-François Berger
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 950)

Abstract

We review the general theory of the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method in the context of the nuclear many-body problem. We examine the response of the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov solutions to a one-body external field and derive the formalism needed to impose multiple constraints on the calculations. Finally, a pedagogical example is given to illustrate the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method using a schematic model of the nucleus.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter was prepared by a contractor of the U.S. Government under contract number DE-AC52-06NA27344. Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

References

  1. 1.
    Ring, P., Schuck, P.: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem. Springer, Heidelberg (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger, J.-F.: Approches de champ moyen et au-delà. Ecole Joliot-Curie, Maubuisson, 10ème session (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greiner, W., Maruhn, J., Bromley, D.A.: Nuclear Models. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaizot, J.-P., Ripka, G.: Quantum Theory of Finite Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dechargé, J., Gogny, D.: Phys. Rev. C 21, 1568 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Péru, S., Martini, M.: Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 88 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mizobuchi, Y.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 1450 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsuyanagi, K.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 67, 1441 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suzuki, T., Mizobuchi, Y.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 79, 480 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukui, T., Matsuo, M., Matsuyanagi, K.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 281 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakatsukasa, T., Walet, N.R.: Phys. Rev. C 58, 3397 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kobayasi, M., Nakatsukasa, T., Matsuo, M., Matsuyanagi, K.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 110, 65 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akaike, H., Tsue, Y., Nishiyama, S.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 112, 583 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinohara, N., Nakatsuakasa, T., Matsuo, M., Matsuyanagi, K.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 115, 567 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baranger, M., Kumar, K.: Nucl. Phys. 62, 113 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nikšić, T., Kralj, N., Tutiš, T., Vretenar, D., Ring, P.: Phys. Rev. C 88, 044327 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Younes, W., Gogny, D.: Phys. Rev. C 80, 054313 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walid Younes
    • 1
  • Daniel Marc Gogny
    • 2
  • Jean-François Berger
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermoreUSA
  2. 2.Lawrence Livermore National LaboratLivermoreUSA
  3. 3.Centre DAM-Ile de FranceRetired from Commissariat à l’Energie AtomiqueBruyères-le-Châtel, ArpajonFrance

Personalised recommendations