Advertisement

Protected Areas and the Integration Process of Mountainous Areas in Mainland Southeast Asia: The Case of Luang Nam Tha, Lao PDR

  • Steve DéryEmail author
  • Lucie Dubé
  • Bakham Chanthavong
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives on Geographical Marginality book series (PGEO, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter is about protected areas in mainland Southeast Asia and how they contribute to transform the whole geography of people who live within them or in their vicinity. Ethnic minorities in mountainous areas are particularly vulnerable. Our hypothesis is that ethnic minorities in general are marginalized in this process of integration into national territorial projects and the world’s economic system. Though, marginality appears at various geographical levels, from internal local village systems to the larger national and international ones. To contribute to study this question, we will rely on the case of Luang Nam Tha province in Lao PDR. In this country, a large protected area system has been created since 1993, mostly with international funding and training. This chapter aims first to present some recent context of protected area development in mainland Southeast Asia, focusing on Laos: what is the geographical portrait and how it contributes to build national territorial projects. Secondly, mostly using the case of Luang Nam Tha province, we identify and analyze how protected areas contribute to transforming the socioeconomic geography of local people and how fast. Cash crops and ecotourism developments are part of this process, an ‘integration process’; and other state endeavours accompany these efforts and add up to this changing local geography. Thirdly, using information gathered in 13 villages in 2008, as well as from several visits since then, including in 2017, we aim to document the local impacts of this integration process. Our conclusion is that the speed of changes constitutes an important variable to measure whether local people are able to adapt during this integration process. The faster the process, the more people that are marginalized.

Keywords

Protected areas Lao PDR National territorial strategy Integration Marginalisation 

References

  1. Baird, I. G. (2009). Spatial (re)organization and places of the Brao in southern Laos and northeastern Cambodia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, XXX(3), 298–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, I. G. (2011, November). Turning land into capital, turning people into labour: Primitive accumulation and the arrival of large-scale economic land concessions in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry, V(1), 10–26.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, I. G., & Shoemaker, B. (2007). Unsettling experiences: Internal resettlement and international aid agencies in Laos. Development and Change, XXXVIII(5), 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird, I. G., et al. (2009). Internal resettlement in Laos. Reading too much into aspirations: More explorations of the space between coerced and voluntary resettlement in Laos. Critical Asian Studies, XLI(4), 605–620.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, S., & De Koninck, R. (1996). The retreat of the forest in Southeast Asia: A cartographic assessment. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, XVII(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird Life Indochina. (2001). Sourcebook of existing and proposed protected areas in Vietnam. Hanoi: Birdlife Indochina.Google Scholar
  7. Boulbet, J. (1967). Pays des Maa’. Domaine des génies. Nggar Maa’, Nggar Yaang. Essai d’ethno-histoire d’une population proto-indochinoise du Viêt Nam central. Paris: École Française d’Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
  8. Bounthavy, S., & Taillard, C. (2000). Atlas de la République démocratique populaire lao. Les structures territoriales du développement économique et social. Paris: CNRS-Libergéo; La Documentation française.Google Scholar
  9. Bruneau, M. (2006). L’Asie d’entre Inde et Chine: logiques territoriales des États. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  10. Brunet, R. (2001). Le déchiffrement du monde. Théorie et pratique de la géographie. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  11. Colchester, M., & Erni, C. (Eds.). (1999). From principles to practice. Indigenous peoples and protected areas in South and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the Conference at Kundasang, Sabah, Malaysia, 14–18 December 1998. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs; The Forest Peoples Programme.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, N. M. (Ed.). (1990). The last rain forests. A world conservation atlas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, N. M., et al. (Eds.). (1991). The conservation atlas of tropical forests. Asia and the Pacific. New York, London, Toronto: Simon and Schuster for IUCN.Google Scholar
  14. De Koninck, R. (1994, June 25). Taming nature or taming people? Business Times (ISEAS Trends), 46, 21.Google Scholar
  15. De koninck, R. (1999). Deforestation in Viet Nam. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  16. De Koninck, R. (2003). Southeast Asian agriculture post-1960: Economic and territorial expansion. In C. L. Sien (Ed.), Southeast Asia transformed: A geography of change (pp. 191–230). Singapour: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  17. De koninck, R. (2005). L’Asie du Sud-Est. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  18. De Koninck, R. (2012). L’Asie du Sud-Est. Paris: Armand Colin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Déry, S. (1996). Expansion agricole et déforestation: Le modèle sud-est asiatique. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec, XL(109), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Déry, S. (2002). Déboisement et déforestation: Une distinction terminologique pour comprendre les politiques agricoles et environnementales au Vietnam. Histoire et Anthropologie, 25, 151–164.Google Scholar
  21. Déry, S. (2004). La colonisation agricole au Vietnam. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  22. Déry, S. (2008). Les aires protégées, nouvel outil du dynamisme des États sud-est asiatiques? Annales de géographie, CXVII(659), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Déry, S. (2007). Les parcs nationaux en Asie du Sud-Est, une manifestation de la transformation de l’État moderne. Le cas du parc national Cat Tien au Vietnam. Géocarrefour, 82(4), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Déry, S. (2010). Studying marginality through a multiscalar grid: A case study from protected areas in Vietnam. In W. Leimgruber et al. (Eds.), Geographical Marginality as a global issue: Papers presented during the Meetings of the Commission on Marginalization, Globalization and Local and Regional Response, 2004–2007. CD-Rom, Vol. 1, International Geographical Union, Commission C08-47, Dunedin, Department of Geography, University of Otago.Google Scholar
  25. Déry, S., Leimgruber, W., & Zcilincsar, W. (2012). Understanding marginality: New insights from a geographical perspective. Hrvatski Geografski Glasnik (Croatian Geographical Bulletin), 74(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Déry, S., & Tremblay, M. (2008). L’implantation des aires protégées au Vietnam: Quels impacts pour les populations locales? Une étude de cas dans la province de Lâm Dông. VertigO, VIII(3), 1–17. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/vertigo/2008-v8-n3-vertigo3702/039588ar.pdf.
  27. Déry, S., & Vanhooren, R. (2011). Protected areas in mainland Southeast Asia, 1973–2005. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, XXXII(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dressler, W. (2014). Green governmentality and swidden decline on Palawan Island, the Philippines. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39, 250– 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dressler, W. H. (2011). First to third nature: the rise of capitalist conservation on Palawan Island, the Philippines. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 533–557.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dressler, W., & Roth, R. (2011). The good, the bad and the contradictory: Neoliberal conservation governance in rural Southeast Asia. World Development, XXXIX(5), 851–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dressler, W., To, P. X., & Mahanty, S. (2013). How biodiversity conservation policy accelerates agrarian differentiation: An account of an upland village in Vietnam. Conservation and Society, 11, 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dubé, L. (2010). La transformation récente des modes de vie des populations montagnardes au Laos: Le cas de la province de Luang Namtha. Département de géographie. Québec, Université Laval. Unpublished dissertation in Geographical Sciences.Google Scholar
  33. Ducourtieux, O., & Castella, J.-C. (2006). Land reforms and the impacts on land use in the uplands of Vietnam and Laos: Environmental protection or poverty alleviation? Manuscript.Google Scholar
  34. Durand, F. (2002). Les mètres-cubes de bois et de carbone qui cachent les forêts tropicales, de l’espace-vie aux enjeux écolo-financiers mondiaux. Histoire et Anthropologie(avril, 25), 33–50.Google Scholar
  35. Ducourtieux, O., et al. (2005). Land policy and farming practices in Laos. Development and Change, XXXVI(3), 499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elden, S. (2005 ). Missing the point: globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1, mars), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Elden, S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Évrard, O. (2006). Chroniques des cendres. Anthropologie des sociétés khmou et des dynamiques interethniques du Nord-Laos. Paris: IRD Éditions.Google Scholar
  39. FAOSTAT. (n.d.). http://faostat.fao.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=291&lang=fr. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed December 12, 2010).
  40. Fisher, C. A. (1966). South-east Asia. A social, political and economic geography. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  41. Fortunel, F. (2003). L’État, les paysanneries et les cultures commerciales pérennes dans les Plateaux du centre Viêt Nam. L’autochtonie en quête de territoires. Toulouse, Université de Toulouse II—Le Mirail, Department of geography, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis dissertation.Google Scholar
  42. Galt, A. (Ed.). (2000). The world commission on Protected areas 2nd Southeast Asia regional forum, Pakse Lao PDR, 6–11 December 1999. Volume II—papers presented. Vientiane: Lao PDR.Google Scholar
  43. Geisler, C. (2003). A new kind of trouble: Evictions in Eden. International Social Science Journal, 175, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Geisler, C., & De Sousa, R. (2001). From refuge to refugee: The African case. Public Administration and Development, 21, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goldman, M. (2005). Imperial nature. The World Bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Government of Laos. (2001). Fact sheets, National biodiversity conservation areas (NBCAs) in Lao PDR. Government of Laos: Vientiane.Google Scholar
  47. Greer, T., & Perry, M. (2003). Environment and natural resources: towards sustainable development. In C. L. Sien (Ed.), Southeast Asia transformed: A geography of change (pp. 143–190). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  48. Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (2011). Powers of exclusion. Land dilemmas in southeast asia. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hickey, G. C. (1982). Sons of the mountains: ethnohistory of the vietnamese central highlands to 1954. New Haven / London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hirsch, P. (1987). Deforestation and development in Thailand. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 8(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hirsch, P. (1995). Deforestation and development in comparative perspective: Thailand, Laos and Vietnam. In Anonyme (Ed.), Management of rain forest in Asia (pp. 1–14). Oslo: Centre for Development and Environment, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  52. Huynh, T. M. P. (2006). Impacts of resettlement projects on gender relations: Coho Community, Loc Nam Commune, Central Highlands, Vietnam. International Development, Community and Environment, Worcester, Clark University. Unpublished Master Dissertation.Google Scholar
  53. ICEM. (2003a). Cambodia National report on protected areas. Review of protected areas and development in the Lower Mekong River Region. Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia: ICEM.Google Scholar
  54. ICEM. (2003b). Lao People’s Democratic Republic National report on protected areas and development. Review of the protected areas and development in the Lower Mekong River Region. Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia: ICEM.Google Scholar
  55. ICEM. (2003c). Thailand National report on protected areas and development. Review of the protected areas and development in the Lower Mekong River Region. Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia: ICEM.Google Scholar
  56. ICEM. (2003d). Vietnam National report on protected areas and development. Review of the protected areas and development in the Lower Mekong River Region. Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia: ICEM.Google Scholar
  57. Ivarsson, S. (2008). Creating laos: The making of a lao space between Indochina and Siam, 1860–1945. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kham, V. (2007). Laos. La redéfinition des stratégies politiques et économiques (1975–2006). Paris: Les Indes Savantes.Google Scholar
  59. Knudsen, A. (1995). State intervention and community protest. Nature conservation in Hunza, North Pakistan. In O. Bruun & A. Kalland (Eds.), Asian perceptions of nature. A critical approach (pp. 103–125). Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
  60. Leblond, J.-P. (2011). Vers une transition forestière en Thaïlande? Analyse causale de l’avancée des forêts à partir du cas de Phetchabun. Montréal, Université de Montréal, Department of Geography. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis Dissertation.Google Scholar
  61. Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos (coll. ‘Société et urbanisme’).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  63. Leimgruber, W. (2004). Between global and local. Marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalization and deregulation. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  64. McElwee, P. (2000). Parks or people: Exploring alternative explanations for protected areas development in Vietnam. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  65. McElwee, P. (2004). You say illegal, I say legal: The relationship between ‘illegal’ logging and land tenure, poverty, and forest use rights in Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, XIX(1–3), 97–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McElwee, P. (2016). Forests are gold. Trees, people, and environmental rule in Vietnam. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  67. McKinnon, J. (1997). The forests of Thailand: Strike up the ban? In D. McCaskill & K. Kampe (Eds.), Development or domestication? Indigenous peoples of Southeast Asia (pp. 117–131). Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
  68. Messerli, P., et al. (2009). Finding homogeneity in heterogeneity—A new approach to quantifying landscape mosaics developed for the Lao PDR. Human Ecology, XXXVII(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2006). Agricultural statistics, 1976–2005. Vientiane.Google Scholar
  70. Morris-Jung, J., & Roth, R. (2010). The blurred boundaries of voluntary resettlement: A case of Cat Tien National Park in Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 29, 202–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Myint Aung, U. (2007). Policy and practice in Myanmar’s protected area system. Journal of Environmental Management, 84, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parnwell, M. J. G., & Bryant, R. L. (Eds.). (1996). Environmental change in South-East Asia: People, politics and sustainable development. London; New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  73. Peluso, N. L. (1993). Coercing conservation: The politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change, 3(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pholsena V. (2011). Laos. Un pays en mutation. Paris: Belin-La Documentation française.Google Scholar
  75. Pholsena, V., & Banomyong, R. (Eds.). (2006). Laos: From buffer state to crossroad?. Bangkok: IRASEC, Mekong Press.Google Scholar
  76. Pinkaew, L. (2002). Redefining nature. Karen ecological knowledge and the challenge to the modern conservation paradigm. Chiang Mai: Earthworm Books.Google Scholar
  77. Phraxayavong, V. (2009). History of aid to Laos. Motivations and impacts. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.Google Scholar
  78. Raffestin, C. (1980). Pour une géographie du pouvoir. Paris: LITEC.Google Scholar
  79. Raffestin, C., & Bresso, M. (1979). Travail, espace, pouvoir. Lausanne: L’âge d’homme.Google Scholar
  80. Rigg, J. (2005). Living with transition in Laos. Market integration in Southeast Asia. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  81. Rigg, J. (2006). Forests, marketization, livelihoods and the poor in the Lao PDR. Land Degradation & Development, XVII(2), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rigg, J. (2007). Moving lives: Migration and livelihoods in the Lao PDR. Population, Space and Place, 13, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rigg, J. (2009). A particular place? Laos and its incorporation into the development mainstream. Environment and Planning A, 41, 703–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rigg, J., & Jerndal, R. (1996). Plenty in the context of scarcity. Forest management in Laos. In M. J. G. Parnwell & R. L. Bryant (Eds.), Environmental change in south-east Asia: People, politics and sustainable development (pp. 145–162). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Robichaud, W., et al. (2001). Review of the national protected area system of Lao PDR. Lao-Swedish Forestry Program: Vientiane.Google Scholar
  86. Rolland, V. (2017). L’intégration des minorités ethniques et des régions montagneuses du nord du Laos: Le cas de la province de Luang Namtha, 1995–2015. Maitrise en sciences géographiques. Québec: Université Laval.Google Scholar
  87. Roth, R. (2004a). ‘Fixing’ the forest: The spatial reorganization of inhabited landscapes in Mae Tho National Park, Thailand. Department of geography, Worcester, Clark University, Unpublished thesis dissertation (Ph.D.).Google Scholar
  88. Roth, R. (2004b). On the colonial margins and in the global hotspot: Park-people conflicts in highland Thailand. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, XLV(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Roth, R. (2004c). Spatial organization of environmental knowledge: Conservation conflicts in the inhabited forest of northern Thailand. Ecology and Society, IX(3), art. 5. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art5/.
  90. Roth, R., & Dressler, W. (2012). Market-oriented conservation governance: The particularities of place. Geoforum, XLIII(3), 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Saunders, J., Flanagan, A., & Basik, N. (2015). Forest conversion in Lao PDR: Implications and impacts of expanding land investment. Washington D.C.: Forest Trends (Coll. ‘Policy Brief’).Google Scholar
  92. Scott, J. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Sikor, T. (2001). The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: Did it cause the expansion of forests in the northwest? Forest Policy and Economics, 2(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sikor, T., Nghiem phuong tuyen, Sowerwine, J., & Romm, J. (Eds.). (2011). Upland Transformations: Opening Boundaries in Vietnam. Singapour: National University of Singapore Press.Google Scholar
  95. Sikor, T., & Tan Quang Nguyen. (2007). Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? forest entitlements in vietnam’s central highlands. World Development, 35(11), 2010–2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Singh, S. (2011, June). Bureaucratic migrants and the potential of prosperity in upland Laos. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2, 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Singh, S. (2012). Developing bureaucracies for environmental governance: At the interface of state authority and World Bank Conditionality in Laos. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong, SEARC Working Papers.Google Scholar
  98. Sodhi, N. S., Lee, T. M., Sekercioglu, C. H., Webb, E. L., Prawiradilaga, D. M., Lohman, D. J., ... Ehrlich, P. R. (2010). Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Taillard, C. (1989). Laos. Stratégies d’un État-tampon. Montpellier: RECLUS.Google Scholar
  100. Thongchai, W. (1994). Siam mapped. A history of the geo-body of a nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  101. UNEP-WCMC. (n.d.). World database on protected areas. http://sea.unep-wcmc.org.
  102. Vandergeest, P. (1996). Mapping nature: Territorialization of forest rights in Thailand. Society and Natural Resources(9), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Vandergeest, P., & Peluso, N. L. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 24, 385–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Vanhooren, R. (2006). Les aires protégées en Asie du Sud-Est continentale, 1962–2005: Une étude des parcs Cát Tiên au Việt Nam, Si Lanna et Doi Suthep-Pui en Thaïlande. Department of geography, Québec, Université Laval, Unpublished master dissertation.Google Scholar
  105. Veilleux, C., & De Koninck, R. (1993). L’état et les besoins de l’agriculture au Cambodge, au Laos et au Viêt-Nam. In Collective (Eds.), Présence et priorités canadiennes en Indochine (pp. 75–123). Québec: GÉRAC.Google Scholar
  106. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  107. Wells, M., & Brandon, K. (1992). People and parks: Linking protected area management with local communities. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  108. West, P. C., & Brechin, S. R. (Eds.). (1991). Resident peoples and national parks. Social dilemmas and strategies in international conservation. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  109. West, P., et al. (2006). Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, XXXV, 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. World Conservation Union (WCU). (1992). Protected areas of the world: A review of national systems (Vol. 1). Gland et Cambridge: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyLaval UniversityQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of ForestryNational University of LaosVientianeLaos

Personalised recommendations