Some Remarks on Mach’s Philosophical Doctrines

  • Sandy Berkovski
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 22)


In his general philosophical remarks, scattered across different oeuvres, Mach subscribed to a number of doctrines. First, the thesis of the economy of science: The primary, perhaps the only legitimate goal of scientific theories is to achieve the economy of thought. Instead of recording many facts, science codifies them under the heading of laws. Instead of attending to individual diverse sensations, science postulates the existence of bodies. Then we have evolutionism: Human activities must ultimately be understood in terms of Darwin’s theory. A man is a biological product of evolutionary development. But only human activities: history of knowledge, ideas, thoughts is only intelligible by the lights of evolutionary theory. Finally, phenomenalism: Sensations are denizens of the world, whereas bodies (material substances) are symbols constructed in thought, chiefly to serve the purposes of economy. Are these views jointly consistent? I argue that the role of naturalism, prominent in the endorsement of the evolutionary theory, creates an unresolved tension among those views. Phenomenalism in particular is deeply revisionary. It appears to be a remnant of empiricist metaphysics casting doubt on pretty much every area of scientific discourse. The adoption of full-fledged philosophical naturalism should be able to resolve the tension without ruling out the possibility of a methodological critique of scientific theories.


  1. Banks, E. C. (2003). Ernst Mach’s World Elements. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks, E. C. (2014). The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mach, E. (1891). Some questions of psycho-physics. The Monist, 1(3):393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mach, E. (1898). Popular Scientific Lectures. Open Court.Google Scholar
  5. Mach, E. (1911). History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Open Court.Google Scholar
  6. Mach, E. (1919). Science of Mechanics. Open Court.Google Scholar
  7. Mach, E. (1959). The Analysis of Sensations. Dover.Google Scholar
  8. Mach, E. (1986). Principles of the Theory of Heat. D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandy Berkovski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations