Advertisement

“The Most Artistic Lesson I Ever Heard” – A Contribution to the Reflection on a Comment Made by William James Regarding a Lesson by Ernst Mach

  • Mariana ValenteEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 22)

Abstract

On November the 2nd 1882, William James visited Ernst Mach in Prague, and attended one of his lectures. The conversation with Mach and the lecture were marking events for James. James was also very interested in Hermann von Helmholtz’s ideas and he attended also one of his lessons. However that lesson had not such a marking effect on James. Based on Mach’s and Helmholtz’s lectures for the general public I propose a reflection on the defining traits that made the said event “the most artistic lesson [James] ever heard”. We shall remark, namely, on the imaginative joy contained in Mach’s texts, which appear to embody some of James’ key ideas on Education. To evaluate these writings as regard the ‘artistic lesson’, we shall turn to William James’s Talks to Teachers on Psychology and Education (1892) and to Alfred Whitehead’s “The Aims of Education” (1929), as well as to some contemporary thinkers.

Keywords

Artistic lesson To experiment Imagination Sensibility Imaginative joy 

References

  1. Allan, G. (2012). Modes of Learning. New York: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. (2007, first edition in english 1946). The Creative Mind. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, J. (1986). Introduction. In: Ernst Mach, Popular Scientific Lectures. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  4. Boutroux, E. (1912). William James. New York: Longmans, Green and CO.Google Scholar
  5. Cahan, D. (ed. 1995). Science & Culture – Popular and Philosophical Essays Hermann von Helmholtz. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Euler, M. (2007). Revitalizing Ernst Mach’s Popular Scientific Lectures. Science & Education, 16, 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groys, B. (1995). An Allegory of Memory, in: Ein szenisches Modell des “Fliegenden Klassenzimmers” nach der Erzählung von Erich Kästner. Ostfildern: Cantz Verlag, pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
  8. Hiebert, E. (1976). Introduction. In: Ernst Mach. Knowledge and Error: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Holton, G. (1993). Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. James, W. (1899). Talks to Teachers on psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  11. James, W. (1996). Conférences sur l’éducation – Psychologie et Éducation. Paris: Éditions L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  12. Jolibert, B. (1996). Introduction. In: Conférences sur l’Éducation – Psychologie et Éducation. Paris: Éditions L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  13. Kästner, E. (2014, first edition in german 1933). The Flying Classroom. Puskin Children’s books.Google Scholar
  14. Mach, E. (1911). History and Root of the Principle of Conservation of Energy. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing CO.Google Scholar
  15. Mach, E. (1915). Kultur und Mechanik. Stuttgard: Verlag Von W. Spemann.Google Scholar
  16. Mach, E. (1976). Knowledge and Error. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mach, E. (1986, first edition 1894 – with less texts). Popular Scientific Lectures. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  18. Matthews, M. (1988). Ernst Mach and thought Experiments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 18, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews, M. (1990). Ernst Mach and contemporary science education reforms. International Journal of Science Education. Vol.12, 3, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nussbaum, M. (2015). L’Art d’Être Juste. Paris: Climats.Google Scholar
  21. Planck, M. (2014 first edition in german language 1948). Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. Open Road Media.Google Scholar
  22. Serres, M. (2015). Le Gaucher Boiteux. Puissance de la Pensée. Paris: Le Pommier.Google Scholar
  23. Siemsen, H. (2014). Ernst Mach: A Genetic Introduction to His Educational Theory and Pedagogy. In: M. Matthews ed., International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, pp. 2329–2359. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Siemsen, H. & Siemsen (2013). The Sensualism de Ernst Mach. Teaching Science. In: Valente, M. & Rivera, J. (eds.), Culturas experimentais. Lisboa: Caleidoscópio.Google Scholar
  25. Těšínská, E. (2010). Ernst Mach, His Prague Physics Students and Their Careers. In: DUB, Petr a Jana MUSILOVÁ. Ernst Mach – Fyzika – Filosofie – Vzd␣lávání. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 75–117. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-4808-2011-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whitehead, A. (1957, first edition 1929). The Aims of Education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FisicaUniversidade de Évora IHC-CEHFCi ÉvoraPortugal

Personalised recommendations