Advertisement

Empiricism or Pragmatism? Ernst Mach’s Ideas in America 1890–1910

  • Erik C. Banks
Chapter
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 22)

Abstract

Ernst Mach’s philosophical ideas were warmly received in America, which already had a pragmatist tradition close to Machian empiricism and budding schools of philosophy, psychology, and physics more or free of the neo-Kantian influences which were a strong academic competitor to the spread of empiricism in Europe. The founding pragmatists Charles Sanders Peirce and William James engaged directly with Mach and Paul Carus, the editor of the Monist and publisher of the Open Court press actively translated and published Mach’s works for the American public. A generation later when members of the Vienna Circle sought Academic posts in elite American universities, the ground was well prepared for their arrival as Holton and Stadler have described. Beneath the surface however, the American reaction to Mach was not one of naïve admiration but fairly staunch criticism, which Mach himself appreciated and welcomed. Peirce was highly critical of Mach’s mechanics in a review and Peirce famously described Mach’s empiricism as akin to riding a horse to death. In some ways, Peirce himself had anticipated aspects of Mach’s views on mind and body, a surprising discovery I made recently. Even Carus, who declared himself an admirer, was highly critical of Mach’s theory of economy of thought. James, too, who admired Mach greatly, had major disagreements with Mach on so-called sensations of innervation in psychology, and although’s James’ own radical empiricist essays owed much to Mach’s neutral monist ideas in the Analysis, James broke away from what he saw as Mach’s excessive physical reductionism, rejecting the monism about nature that was Mach’s trademark. In short Mach’s ideas acted as a stimulus to American thinkers, but they had their own tradition and they were able to resist his authority and contribute in reverse to Mach’s own refinement of his positions.

References

  1. Erik Banks, Ernst Mach’s World Elements. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. ———, The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. John Blackmore, Ernst Mach: His Life, Work and Influence. University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Paul Carus, “Professor Mach’s Term ‘Sensation’” The Monist, 3, 2, 1893, 298–299.Google Scholar
  5. ———, “Professor Mach’s Philosophy” The Monist, 16, 1906, 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klaus Hentschel/John Blackmore (Eds.) Ernst Mach als Aussenseiter. Vienna: Braumüller, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Gerald Holton, “Ernst Mach and the Fortunes of Positivism in America” Isis, 83, 1, 1992, 27–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. William James, The Writings of William James. (J.J. McDermott, ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. Ernst Mach, History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Chicago: Open Court, 1910 (orig 1872).Google Scholar
  10. ———, The Science of Mechanics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1960 (orig. 1883).Google Scholar
  11. ———, The Analysis of Sensations. New York: Dover, 1959 (orig. 1886).Google Scholar
  12. ———, “The Analysis of the Sensations: Antimetaphysical” The Monist 1, 1, 1890, 48–68.Google Scholar
  13. ———, Popular Scientific Lectures. Chicago: Open Court, 1895.Google Scholar
  14. ———, Knowledge and Error. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1976 (orig 1905).Google Scholar
  15. Gerald Myers, Willam James: His Life and Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Charles Sanders Peirce, Collected Papers, C. Hartschorne and P. Weiss, eds., Vol. I, Cambridge, 1931.Google Scholar
  17. ———, “Mach’s Science of Mechanics,” The Nation, 57, 1893, 251–252Google Scholar
  18. Ralph Barton Perry, Present Philosophical Tendencies, New York: Longman’s, Green and Co. 1925.Google Scholar
  19. ———, et al. “Program and First Platform of Six American Realists” Journal of Philosophy and Scientific Methods 7, 15, 1910, 393–401.Google Scholar
  20. Bertrand Russell, Collected Papers. Vol 7. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984.Google Scholar
  21. Friedrich Stadler, The Vienna Circle—Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism. Vienna: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. J.B. Stallo, The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics (1882). Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1960.Google Scholar
  23. Leopold Stubenberg “Neutral Monism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/neutral-monism/ accessed: November 2016.
  24. Joachim Thiele, Wissenschaftliche Kommunikation: Die Korrespondenz Ernst Machs. Kastellaun: Henn, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik C. Banks
    • 1
  1. 1.Wright State UniversityDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations