Advertisement

Brentano’s Lectures on Positivism (1893–1894) and His Relationship to Ernst Mach

  • Denis FisetteEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 22)

Abstract

Franz Brentano’s criticism of Mach in his lectures on Positivism (1893–1894)

This paper is mainly about Brentano’s commentaries on Ernst Mach in his lectures “Contemporary philosophical questions” which he held one year before he left Austria. I will first identify the main sources of Brentano’s early interests in positivism during his Würzburg period. The second section provides a short overview of Brentano’s 1893–1894 lectures and his criticism of Comte, Kirchhoff, and Mill. The next sections bear on Brentano’s criticism of Mach’s monism and Brentano’s argument, based on his theory of intentionality, against the identification of mental to physical phenomena. The last section is about Brentano’s proposal to replace the identity relation in Mach’s theory of elements by that of intentional correlation. I conclude with a remark on the history of philosophy in Austria.

References

  1. Brentano, F. (2009) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte (1874), M. Antonelli (ed.), Schriften I, 1,, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2008; Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, tramns. A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, D. B., and L. McAlister, London and New York: Routledge, cited as Psychology.Google Scholar
  2. Brentano, F. (1998) “Die vier Phasen der Philosophie und ihr augenblicklicher Stand”, in O. Kraus, (ed.), Die vier Phasen der Philosophie und ihr augenblicklicher Stand, Stuttgart: Cotta, 1895, pp. 1–31; The Four Phases of Philosophy, trans. B. Mezei & B. Smith, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Brentano, F. (1988) Über Ernst Machs ‘Erkenntnis und Irrtum’, R. Chisholm & J. Marek (eds.), Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  4. Brentano, F. (1982) Deskriptive Psychologie, R. Chisholm & W. Baumgartner (eds.), Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  5. Brentano, F. (1929) Über die Zukunft der Philosophie: nebst den Vorträgen, O. Kraus, (ed.), Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  6. Brentano, F. (1929a) “Über die Gründe der Entmutigung auf philosophischem Gebiet”, in O. Kraus, (ed.), Über die Zukunft der Philosophie: nebst den Vorträgen, Hamburg: Meiner, p. 82–100.Google Scholar
  7. Brentano, F. (1929b) “Die Habilitationsthesen”, in Kraus, Oskar (ed.), Über die Zukunft der Philosophie, Hamburg: Meiner, p. 133–141.Google Scholar
  8. Brentano, F. (1929c) “Über die Zukunft der Philosophie”, in O. Kraus (ed.), Über die Zukunft der Philosophie, Hamburg: Meiner, p. 1–48.Google Scholar
  9. Brentano, F. (1929d) “Über Schellings Philosophie”, in O. Kraus (ed.), Über die Zukunft der Philosophie, Hamburg: Meiner, p. 103–132.Google Scholar
  10. Brentano, F. (1907) Untersuchungen zur Sinnespsychologie, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  11. Brentano, F. (1893–1894) Lectures: Zeitbewegende philosophische Fragen, Houghton Library: Harvard, LS 20, p. 29366–29475.Google Scholar
  12. Brentano, F. (1869) ‘Auguste Comte und die positive Philosophie’, Chilianeum, Blätter für katholische Wissenschaft, Kunst und Leben 2 (1869), 15–37; new edition by O. Kraus, (ed.), Die vier Phasen der Philosophie und ihr augenblicklicher Stand, Hamburg: Felix Meiner,1968, p. 97–133.Google Scholar
  13. Crane, T. (2014) Aspects of Psychologism, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fisette, D. (2012) “Phenomenology and Phenomenalism : Ernst Mach and the Genesis of Husserl’s Phenomenology”, Axiomathes, vol. 22, p. 53–74.Google Scholar
  15. Fisette, D. (2018) “Franz Brentano and Auguste Comte’s positive philosophy”, Brentano Studien, vol. 16, p. 361–372.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, E. (1994) Briefwechsel. Die Brentanoschule, Schuhmann Karl (ed.) Dordrecht: Kluwer, vol. I.Google Scholar
  17. Kirchhoff, G. R. (1877) Vorlesungen über Mechanik, 2. ed., Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  18. Mach, E. (1976) Mach, E. Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung, Leipzig: Barth, 1905; eng. transl. Knowledge and Error, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Mach, E. (1943) “The Economical Nature of Physical Inquiry”, Popular Scientific Lectures, La Salle : Open Court, p. 186–213.Google Scholar
  20. Mach, E. (1914) Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen, 6e ed., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1991; The Analysis of Sensations, transl. C. Williams, London: Open Court, 1914.Google Scholar
  21. Mach, E. (1903) Mach, E. “Über das Prinzip der Vergleichung in der Physik,” in Populärwissenschaftliche Vorlesungen, Leipzig: Barth, 3rd ed., p. 266–289.Google Scholar
  22. Mach, E. (1891)“Sensations and the Elements of Reality”, The Monist, Vol. 1, p. 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mach, E. (1892) “Facts and Mental Symbols”, The Monist, Vol. 2, p. 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mill, J. S. (1972) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873, M. Francis and L. Dwight N. (eds.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972, vol. XVII, part IV.Google Scholar
  25. Mill, J. S. (1969) Auguste Comte and Positivism, 1865, in J. S. Mill, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. X, p. 261–36, J. M. Robson (ed.), Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  26. Mill, J. S. (1865) An examination of Sir William Hamilton’s philosophy, and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings, London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green.Google Scholar
  27. Münch, D. (1989) “Brentano and Comte”, Grazer Philosophische Studien, vol. 35, p. 33–54.Google Scholar
  28. Neurath, O. (1935) Le développement du Cercle de Vienne et l’avenir de l’empirisme logique, Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  29. Stadler, F. (1997) Studien zum Wiener Kreis, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Quebec at MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations