Towards the Identification of Parkinson’s Disease Using only T1 MR Images

  • Sara SoltaninejadEmail author
  • Irene Cheng
  • Anup Basu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11010)


Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is one of the most common types of neurological diseases caused by progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the brain. Even though there is no fixed cure for this neurodegenerative disease, earlier diagnosis followed by earlier treatment can help patients have a better quality of life. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been one of the most popular diagnostic tool in recent years because it avoids harmful radiations. In this paper, we investigate the plausibility of using MRIs for automatically diagnosing PD. Our proposed method has three main steps: (1) Preprocessing, (2) Feature Extraction, and (3) Classification. The FreeSurfer library is used for the first and the second steps. For classification, three main types of classifiers, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), are applied and their classification ability is compared. The Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) data set is used to evaluate the proposed method. The proposed system prove to be promising in assisting the diagnosis of PD.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Fox, S.H., et al.: The movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review update: treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 26(S3), S2–S41 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaudhuri, K.R., Schapira, A.H.: Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: dopaminergic pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 8(5), 464–474 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rana, B., et al.: Relevant 3D local binary pattern based features from fused feature descriptor for differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using structural MRI. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 34, 134–143 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adeli, E., et al.: Joint feature-sample selection and robust diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease from MRI data. NeuroImage 141, 206–219 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prashanth, R., Roy, S.D., Mandal, P.K., Ghosh, S.: Automatic classification and prediction models for early Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from SPECT imaging. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 3333–3342 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Politis, M., Loane, C.: Serotonergic dysfunction in parkinson’s disease and its relevance to disability. Sci. World J. 11, 9 (2011). Article ID 172893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Focke, N.K., et al.: Individual voxel-base subtype prediction can differentiate progressive supranuclear palsy from idiopathic Parkinson syndrome and healthy controls. Hum. Brain Mapp. 32(11), 1905–1915 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babu, G.S., Suresh, S., Mahanand, B.S.: A novel PBL-McRBFN-RFE approach for identification of critical brain regions responsible for Parkinson’s disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(2), 478–488 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salvatore, C., et al.: Machine learning on brain MRI data for differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. J. Neurosci. Methods 222, 230–237 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rana, B., et al.: Regions-of-interest based automated diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using T1-weighted MRI. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(9), 4506–4516 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rana, B., et al.: Graph-theory-based spectral feature selection for computer aided diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using T1-weighted MRI. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 25(3), 245–255 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peng, B., et al.: A multilevel-ROI-features-based machine learning method for detection of morphometric biomarkers in Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 651, 88–94 (2017). ISSN 0304–3940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adeli, E., et al.: Joint feature-sample selection and robust diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease from MRI data. NeuroImage 141, 206–219 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Worker, A., et al.: Cortical thickness, surface area and volume measures in Parkinson’s disease, multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy. PLoS One 9(12), e114167 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin, J., Jurafsky, D.: Speech and Language Processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations