Advertisement

Illuminating the “Dark Side” of Emerging Technologies

  • Aharon Hauptman
Chapter
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)

Abstract

Almost every new technology developed for the benefit of society has a potential “dark side”, manifested, for example, by security or privacy threats. This chapter presents some findings of two European projects, which by employing foresight methods tried to shed light on these dark sides: one project assessed the threats of potential abuse (by criminals or terrorists) posed by selected emerging technologies, while the second focused on the impacts of emerging technologies on privacy. In both projects special attention was paid to new, even surprising possibilities opened by the convergence of technologies. Both projects also dealt with related policy issues. The foresight processes, which helped to explore evolving security or privacy aspects of new technologies, reflect a need for continuous analysis of the unfolding technology landscape for potential, sometimes surprising implications.

Keywords

Foresight Emerging technologies Responsible research and innovation (RRI) Security Privacy Emerging threats Policy Wild cards 

References

  1. Ahituv N et al (2013) Privacy implications of emerging technologies for stakeholders: research summary and policy recommendations. PRACTIS Deliverable D6.3Google Scholar
  2. Auffermann B, Hauptman A (2012) EFP Foresight Brief No. 225. http://www.foresight-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/EFP-Brief-No.-225-FESTOS.pdf
  3. Auffermann B, Luoto L (2011) Integrated security threats report. FESTOS Deliverable D3.3, with contribution from all partnersGoogle Scholar
  4. deCharms RC (2008) Applications of real-time fMRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(9):721Google Scholar
  5. Dienel HL, Peperhove R (2011) Final scenario and indicators report. FESTOS Deliverable D4.3Google Scholar
  6. Dyson F (2009) “Radiotelepathy”, the direct communication of feelings and thought from brain to brain. Edge 2009. www.edge.org/q2009/q09_3.html
  7. Hauptman A, Sharan Y (2013) Foresight of evolving security threats posed by emerging technologies. Foresight J Future Stud Strateg Think Policy 15(5):375–391Google Scholar
  8. Hauptman A, Steinmüller K (2019) Surprising scenarios: imagination as a dimension of foresight. In: Peperhove R et al (eds) Envisioning uncertain futures. Springer, Berlin (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  9. Hauptman A, Sharan Y, Soffer T (2011) Privacy perception in the ICT era and beyond. In: von Shomberg R (ed) Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/mep-rapport-2011_en.pdf
  10. Lee B, Preston F (2012) Preparing for high-impact, low-probability events – lessons from Eyjafjallajokull. A Chatham House reportGoogle Scholar
  11. Petersen JL, Steinmüller K (2009) Wild cards. In: Glenn JC, Gordon TJ (eds) Futures research methodology – V3.0. The millennium projectGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwartz P, Randall D (2007) Anticipating strategic surprises. In: Fukuyama F (ed) Blindside – how to anticipate forcing events and wild cards in global politics. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Toumey C (2007) Plenty of eyes at the bottom. Nat Nanotechnol 2:192–193.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aharon Hauptman
    • 1
  1. 1.Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations