Advertisement

Design of Gameplay for Learning

  • Fengfeng Ke
  • Valerie Shute
  • Kathleen M. Clark
  • Gordon Erlebacher
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Game-Based Learning book series (AGBL)

Abstract

A common skepticism about educational games is that learning and play are frequently not well integrated—the skill or content to be used and learned lacks a semantic or meaningful relation with the fantasy and challenge elements and can be easily swapped without influencing gameplay. In this chapter, we describe and analyze design challenges associated with the core components of gameplay—game mechanics and the narrative scheme as it relates to learning—and review the gameplay design propositions and infield test findings of E-Rebuild. Via a retrospective investigation of design features and strategies in terms of learnability and playability (i.e., capability of activating knowledge-based cognitive performance without interrupting gameplay), this chapter aims to report and discuss how domain-specific learning is integrated in, and activated by, core game actions, rules, game objects, and the game world design.

Keywords

Game mechanic Learning-play integration Domain-specific gameplay Intermediary user interface Mathematical reasoning 

References

  1. Ang, C. S. (2006). Rules, gameplay, and narratives in video games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(3), 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frasca, Gonzalo (1999). Ludology meets narratology: similitude and differences between (video) games and narrative. Retrieved from http://www.ludology.org/articles/ludology.htmGoogle Scholar
  4. Ge, X., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Designing engaging educational games and assessing engagement in game-based learning. In R. Zheng & M. K. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications (pp. 255–272). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  5. Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamlen, K. R. (2012). Academic dishonesty and video game play: Is new media use changing conceptions of cheating? Computers & Education, 59(4), 1145–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Järvinen, A. (2008). Games without Frontiers: Theories and Methods for Game Studies and Design. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Jenkins, H. (2002). Game design as narrative architecture. In P. Harrington & N. Frup-Waldrop (Eds.), First person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Retrieved from: http://www.anabiosispress.org/VM606/1stPerson_hjenkins.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ke, F., Xie, K., & Xie, Y. (2016). Game-based learning engagement: A theory-and data-driven exploration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1183–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ke, F., Xu, X., Lee, S., Moon, J., Dai, Z., Pan, Y., Shute, V., Clark, K., & Erlebacher, G. (presented 2017, April). Math learning through game-based architectural design and building. Presentation at 2017 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward: Obstacles, opportunities, & openness. Boston: The Education Arcade Retrieved from http://education.mit.edu/papers/MovingLearningGamesForward_EdArcade.pdfGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindley, C. A., & Sennersten, C. C. (2008). Game play schemas: From player analysis to adaptive game mechanics, 216784. International Journal of Computer Games Technology Retrieved from:  https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/216784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, learning, and instruction, 3(1987), 223–253.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, C. S., Lehman, J. F., & Koedinger, K. R. (1999). Goals and learning in microworlds. Cognitive Science, 23(3), 305–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Richards, J., Stebbins, L., & Moellering, K. (2013). In J. Richards, L. Stebbins, & K. Moellering (Eds.), Games for a digital age: K-12 market map and investment analysis. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
  18. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  19. Schell, J. (2014). The art of game design: A book of lenses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 89(4), 361–380.Google Scholar
  21. Sicart, M. (2008). Defining game mechanics. Game Studies, 8(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  22. Stacey, K. (2006). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Progress report of the APEC project: collaborative studies on innovations for teaching and learning mathematics in different cultures (II)—Lesson study focusing on mathematical thinking.Google Scholar
  23. Suits, B. H. (1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Toronto, ON/Buffalo, NY: University of Tronto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, A. (2009). Linking architecture and education: Sustainable design for learning environments. Albuquerque, NM: UNM Press.Google Scholar
  25. Torbeyns, J., Lehtinen, E., & Elen, J. (2015). Describing and studying domain-specific serious games. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fengfeng Ke
    • 1
  • Valerie Shute
    • 1
  • Kathleen M. Clark
    • 2
  • Gordon Erlebacher
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and Learning SystemsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.School of Teacher EducationFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Scientific ComputingFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations