The Influence of Social Media on Engendering Strategic Organisational Practices – The Case of Two Tanzanian Telecommunications Companies

  • Shirumisha KwayuEmail author
  • Banita LalEmail author
  • Mumin AbubakreEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 533)


The plethora of social media platforms such as Facebook, twitter, Instagram and WhatsApp has enhanced the information systems within organisations while at the same time being a conundrum to executives, who need to develop strategy around this technology. This paper explores the influence of different social media applications on engendering strategic organisational practices using a practice perspective. Through the practice lens and with the guidance of the interpretivist philosophy, this paper collects empirical evidence from two telecom organisations in Tanzania. The findings show that different types of social media applications play different roles in engendering different strategizing methods, such as formal and informal. Depending on the role the application plays. In practice, this will help organisational executives in the selection of social media applications, which is a crucial stage in the development of social media strategy.


Social media Practice perspective WhatsApp Strategizing 


  1. Avgerou, C.: Theoretical framing of ICT4D research. In: Choudrie, J., Islam, M.Sirajul, Wahid, F., Bass, Julian M., Priyatma, J.E. (eds.) ICT4D 2017. IAICT, vol. 504, pp. 10–23. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  2. Berthon, P.R., Pitt, L.F., Plangger, K., Shapiro, D.: Marketing meets web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: implications for international marketing strategy. Bus. Horizons 55(3), 261–271 (2012). Scholar
  3. Braojos-Gomez, J., Benitez-Amado, J. Llorens-Montes, F.J.: How do small firms learn to develop a social media competence? Int. J. Inf. Manage. 35(4), 443–458 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Culnan, M., Mchugh, P., Zubillaga, J.: How large U.S. companies can use twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Q. Executive 9(4), 243–259 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory, pp. 1–19. Weidenfield & Nicolson, London (1967)Google Scholar
  7. Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., Vaara, E. (eds.): Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015). Scholar
  8. Hanna, R., Rohm, A., Crittenden, V.L.: We’re all connected: the power of the social media ecosystem. Bus. Horizons 54(3), 265–273 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarzabkowski, P.: Strategy as practice: An activity based approach. Sage (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horizons 53(1), 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kietzmann, J.H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I.P., Silvestre, B.S.: Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus. Horizons 54(3), 241–251 (2011). Scholar
  12. Kvale, S.: The 1,000-page question. Qualitative inquiry 2(3), 275–284 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwayu, S., Lal, B., Abubakre, M.: Enhancing organisational competitiveness via social media-a strategy as practice perspective. Inf. Syst. Front. 20, 1–18 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. Leonardi, P., Vaast, E.: Social media and their affordances for organizing: a review and agenda for research. Acad. Manage. Ann. 11(1), 150–188 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Locke, A., Lawthom, R., Lyons, A.: Social media platforms as complex and contradictory spaces for feminisms: visibility, opportunity, power, resistance and activism (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orlikowski, W.J.: Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying Technology in Organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4), 404–428 (2000). Scholar
  17. Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9), 1435–1448 (2007). Scholar
  18. Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 1–28 (1991). Scholar
  19. Pan, S.L., Tan, B.: Demystifying case research: a structured– pragmatic–situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies. Inf. Organ. 21(3), 161–176 (2011). Scholar
  20. Pillet, J.C., Carillo, K.D.A.: Email-free collaboration: an exploratory study on the formation of new work habits among knowledge workers. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(1), 113–125 (2016). Scholar
  21. Piskorski, M.J.: A Social Strategy: How We Profit from Social Media. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014).
  22. Richey, M., Gonibeed, A., Ravishankar, M.N.: The perils and promises of self-disclosure on social media. Inf. Syst. Front. (2018). Scholar
  23. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research methods for business students. Pearson education (2009)Google Scholar
  24. Scott, S.V., Orlikowski, W.J.: Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 37(1), 26–40 (2012). Scholar
  25. Scott, S., Orlikowski, W.: Entanglements in practice: performing anonymity through social media. MIS Q. 38(3), 873–893 (2014). Scholar
  26. Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The social psychology of telecommunications (1976)Google Scholar
  27. Treem, J.W., Leonardi, P.M.: Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Commun. Yearb. 36, 143–189 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations