Advertisement

Why Governing Data Is Difficult: Findings from Danish Local Government

  • Olivia Benfeldt Nielsen
  • John Stouby Persson
  • Sabine Madsen
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 533)

Abstract

Data governance has emerged as a promising approach for transforming organizations. While governing data as an organizational asset has clear benefits, no previous studies have reported on the particular challenges faced by practitioners in local government organizations. Against this backdrop, we investigate why it is difficult for local government organizations to explore and exploit their data assets with data governance. Following an engaged scholarship approach, we carried out six group interviews conducted with 34 representatives from 13 different Danish municipalities. From the analysis, we identified nine challenges relating to three overall themes that are critical to governing data in local government: (1) data value and overview, (2) data practices and collaboration and (3) data capabilities and politics. We explain how the three themes extend previous research in data governance and e-government literature. The implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Data governance Public sector Municipalities E-government Local government Engaged scholarship 

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson, N., Ravindran, R., Nicosia, S.: Government data does not mean data governance: lessons learned from a public sector application audit. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 316–322 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brous, P.: Paradoxes, conflicts and tensions in establishing master data. In: 24th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, Y.W., Madnick, S.E., Wang, R.Y., Wang, F.L., Zhang, H.: A cubic framework for the chief data officer: succeeding in a world of big data. MIS Q. Exec. 13, 1–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khatri, V., Brown, C.V.: Designing data governance. Commun. ACM 53, 148 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benfeldt Nielsen, O.: A comprehensive review of data governance literature. In: Selected Papers of the IRIS (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vilminko-Heikkinen, R.: Data, Technology, and People. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    European Commission: Europe’s Digital Progress Report - The Digital Economy and Society IndexGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spitze & Co: Resultater for overgangen til digital kommunikation 2011–2015 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Danish Ministry of Finance: A Stronger and More Secure Digital Denmark: Digital Strategy 2016–2020 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benner, M.L., Tushman, M.J.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28, 238–256 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gregory, R.W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., Mähring, M.: Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inf. Syst. Res. 26, 57–80 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peppard, J., Galliers, R.D., Thorogood, A.: Information systems strategy as practice: micro strategy and strategizing for IS. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23, 1–10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peppard, J.: Where do you begin with your (Big) data initiative? Eur. Bus. Rev. (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nielsen, P.A., Persson, J.S.: Engaged problem formulation in IS research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 38, 720–737 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boisot, M., Canals, A.: Data, information and knowledge: have we got it right? J. Evol. Econ. 14, 43–67 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Otto, B.: Organizing data governance: findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 29, 45–66 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wende, K., Otto, B.: A contingency approach to data governance. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, USA, pp. 1–14 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber, K., Otto, B., Österle, H.: One size does not fit all - a contingency approach to data governance. ACM J. Data Inf. Qual. 1, 1–27 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., Daly, M.: Data governance activities: an analysis of the literature. J. Decis. Syst. 25, 64–75 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ladley, J.: Data Governance: How to Design, Deploy, and Sustain an Effective Data Governance Program. Newnes (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pierce, E., Dismute, W.S., Yonke, C.L.: The State of Information and Data Governance - Understanding How Organizations Govern Their Information and Data Assets (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otto, B.: Data governance. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 3, 241–244 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Begg, C., Caira, T.: Data governance in practice: the SME quandary reflections on the reality of data governance in the small to medium enterprise (SME) sector. In: 5th European Conference on Management Information and Evaluation, pp. 75–83 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Begg, C., Caira, T.: Exploring the SME quandary: data governance in practise in the small to medium-sized enterprise sector. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 15, 3–13 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vilminko-Heikkinen, R., Brous, P., Pekkola, S.: Paradoxes, conflicts and tensions in establishing master data management function. In: 24th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fontana, A., Frey, J.H.: Interviewing: the arts of science. In: The Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 361–376 (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harvey, L.J., Myers, M.D.: Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap. Inf. Technol. People 8, 13–27 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Persson, J.S., Kaldahl, A., Skorve, E., Nielsen, P.A.: Value positions in E-government strategies: something is (Not) changing in the state of Denmark. In: Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 904–917 (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17, 2–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guha, J., Chakrabarti, B.: Making e-government work: adopting the network approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, 327–336 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Azad, B., Faraj, S.: E-Government institutionalizing practices of a land registration mapping system. Gov. Inf. Q. 26, 5–14 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Juell-Skielse, G., Lönn, C.-M., Päivärinta, T.: Modes of collaboration and expected benefits of inter-organizational E-government initiatives: a multi-case study. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 578–590 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim, D., Grant, G.: E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 12, 230–244 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rowley, J.: E-Government stakeholders - who are they and what do they want? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31, 53–62 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rose, J., Persson, J.S., Heeager, L.T., Irani, Z.: Managing e-Government: value positions and relationships. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 531–571 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brous, P., Vilminko-Heikkinen, R., Brou, P., Pekkola, S.: Paradoxes, conflicts and tensions in establishing master data. In: Proceedings of ECIS 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rose, J., Persson, J.S., Heeager, L.T.: How e-Government managers prioritise rival value positions: the efficiency imperative. Inf. Polity 20, 35–59 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Medaglia, R.: eParticipation research: moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 346–360 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Olphert, W., Damodaran, L.: Citizen participation and engagement in the design of E-government services: the missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 491–507 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivia Benfeldt Nielsen
    • 1
  • John Stouby Persson
    • 2
  • Sabine Madsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations