Advertisement

New Infrastructure Technology and Smart Institutional Interventions: The Case of Implementing Government Cloud Computing in Oman

  • Khalid Alzadjali
  • Amany Elbanna
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 533)

Abstract

Cloud computing technology presents a case of centralized technology that requires adherence to standard and planned approach for its adoption and implementation. There is little knowledge on how institutions could influence the successful migration to the cloud considering the challenges of adopting technology infrastructure. This research questions: How do institutions influence the implementation of cloud computing and to what effect? It examines the institutional intervention practices that influence the migration of the IT services of the Ministry of Health to a national government cloud platform in Oman. The study adopts concepts from institutional theory. The findings reveal that isomorphic pressures play an important role in the successful migration to cloud services. It also shows that mimetic pressure plays a propelling role that supports finding and accepting solutions and pushes the migration forward.

Keywords

Information infrastructure Cloud computing Implementation Institutional theory Isomorphic mechanisms 

References

  1. Adler-Milstein, J., McAfee, A.P., Bates, D.W., Jha, A.K.: The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. Health Aff. 27(1), 60–69 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, S., Cummings, L.L.: Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organ. Sci. 8(3), 235–256 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armbrust, M., et al.: A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53(4), 50-58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avgerou, C.: IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective. Inf. Technol. People 13(4), 234–262 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baptista, J., Newell, S., Currie, W.: Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 19(3), 171–183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11(3), 369–386 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benders, J., Batenburg, R., Van der Blonk, H.: Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems. Inf. Manag. 43(2), 194–203 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhat, J.M.: Adoption of cloud computing by SMEs in India: a study of the institutional factors. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems (2013)Google Scholar
  9. Braa, J., Hanseth, O., Heywood, A., Mohammed, W., Shaw, V.: Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Q. 31(2), 381–402 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, D.H., Thompson, S.: Priorities, policies and practice of e-government in a developing country context: ICT infrastructure and diffusion in Jamaica. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 20(3), 329–342 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buyya, R., Broberg, J., Goscinski, A.M.: Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms. Wiley, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  12. Chang, V., Ramachandran, M.: Towards achieving data security with the cloud computing adoption framework. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 9(1), 138–151 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiasson, M.W., Davidson, E.: Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Q., 591–605 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choudhary, V., Vithayathil, J.: The impact of cloud computing: should the IT department be organized as a cost center or a profit center? J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 30(2), 67–100 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciborra, C.U., Hanseth, O.: From tool to Gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Inf. Technol. People 11(4), 305–327 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Creeger, M.: Cloud computing: an overview. ACM Queue 7(5), 626–631 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Currie, W.: Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Inf. Technol. People 22(1), 63–77 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Currie, W.L.: Institutional isomorphism and change: the national programme for IT–10 years on. J. Inf. Technol. 27(3), 236–248 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Currie, W.L., Guah, M.W.: Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology 22(3), 235–247 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Currie, W.L., Swanson, E.B.: Special issue on institutional theory in information systems research: contextualizing the IT artefact (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson, E.J., Chismar, W.G.: The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry. MIS Q. 31(4), 739–758 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev., 147–160 (1983)Google Scholar
  23. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago University, Chicago, USA (1991)Google Scholar
  24. Durkee, D.: Why cloud computing will never be free. ACM Queue, 01–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. Flanagin, A.J.: Social pressures on organizational website adoption. Hum. Commun. Res. 26(4), 618–646 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. GCC 2015. Foundations and Objectives of GCCGoogle Scholar
  27. Giniat, E.J.: Cloud computing: innovating the business of health care. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 65(5), 130–131 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. Goode, S., Lin, C., Tsai, J.C., Jiang, J.J.: Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers. Decis. Support Syst. 70, 73–85 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gosain, S.: Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: the new iron cage? J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 5(4), 6 (2004)Google Scholar
  30. Gratner 2014. Predicts 2014: Cloud Computing Affects All Aspects of ITGoogle Scholar
  31. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 611–642 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grimshaw, D., Miozzo, M.: Institutional effects on the IT outsourcing market: analysing clients, suppliers and staff transfer in Germany and the UK. Organ. Stud. 27(9), 1229–1259 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Güner, E.O., Sneiders, E.: Cloud Computing Adoption Factors In Turkish Large Scale Enterprises, PACIS, AISeL, Chendu, China, pp. 353–361 (2014)Google Scholar
  34. Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M., Aanestad, M.: Reflexive standardization: side effects and complexity in standard making. MIS Q. 30, 563–581 (2006). Special IssueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanseth, O., Lyytinen, K.: Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J. Inf. Technol. 25(1), 1–19 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E.: Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Account. Manage. Inf. Technol. 7(4), 183–211 (1997)Google Scholar
  37. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E.: Changing irreversible networks. ECIS, pp. 1123–1139. http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/ecis.html1998
  38. Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., Hatling, M.: Developing information infrastructure: the tension between standardization and flexibility. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 21(4), 407–426 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herath, T., Rao, H.R.: Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decis. Support Syst. 47(2), 154–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoberg, P., Wollersheim, J., Krcmar, H.: The business perspective on cloud computing-a literature review of research on cloud computing. In: AMCIS, AISeL (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Hu, Q., Hart, P., Cooke, D.: The role of external and internal influences on information systems security–a neo-institutional perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 16(2), 153–172 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iannacci, F.: When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(1), 35–48 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ITA. 2015: ITA G-Cloud overview, ITAGoogle Scholar
  44. Jepperson, R.L.: Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 143–163. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  45. King, J.L., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L., McFarlan, F.W., Raman, K., Yap, C.-S.: Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 5(2), 139–169 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kondra, A.Z., Hurst, D.C.: Institutional processes of organizational culture. Cult. Organ. 15(1), 39–58 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kostova, T., Roth, K., Dacin, M.T.: Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 33(4), 994–1006 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lai, K.-H., Wong, C.W., Cheng, T.E.: Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management. Comput. Ind. 57(1), 93–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leimeister, S., Böhm, M., Riedl, C., Krcmar, H.: The business perspective of cloud computing: actors, roles and value networks. In: ECIS Proceedings, AISeL, pp. 1–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  50. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., Xue, Y.: Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q., 59–87 (2007)Google Scholar
  51. Low, C., Chen, Y., Wu, M.: Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 111(7), 1006–1023 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahmood, M.A., Arslan, F., Dandu, J., Udo, G.: Impact of cloud computing adoption on firm stock price–an empirical research. In: AMCIS (2014)Google Scholar
  53. Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., Ghalsasi, A.: Cloud computing—the business perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 51(1), 176–189 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing (draft). NIST special publication 800(145), 7 (2011a)Google Scholar
  55. Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing: recommendations of the national institute of standards and technology. The National Institute of Standards and Technology - The US Department of Commerce (2011b)Google Scholar
  56. Meulen, R.V.D.: Understanding cloud adoption in government. Gartner (2017). https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/understanding-cloud-adoption-in-government/
  57. Mignerat, M., Rivard, S.: Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. J. Inf. Technol. 24(4), 369–391 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn. London, England: California, USA (1994)Google Scholar
  59. Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Williams, R.: Innovation in information infrastructures: introduction to the special issue. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  60. Myers, M.: Qualitative research in information systems. Association for Information Systems. http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/
  61. Myers, M.D.: Qualitative research in information systems. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 21(2), 241–242 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. NIST 2009. Working definition of cloud computing, in US governmentGoogle Scholar
  63. Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Espadanal, M.: Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: an analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Inf. Manag. 51(5), 497–510 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 1–28 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Petkovic, I.: CRM in the cloud, pp. 365–370. IEEE, Subotica, Serbia (2010)Google Scholar
  66. Pipek, V., Wulf, V.: Infrastructuring: toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(5), 447–473 (2009)Google Scholar
  67. Ribes, D., Finholt, T.A.: The long now of technology infrastructure: articulating tensions in development. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(5), 375–398 (2009)Google Scholar
  68. Sabi, H.M., Uzoka, F.-M.E., Langmia, K., Njeh, F.N.: Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(2), 183–191 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sahay, S., Monteiro, E., Aanestad, M.: Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: health e-infrastructures in India. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(5), 4 (2009)Google Scholar
  70. Saunders, M.N., Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research methods for business students, 4/e. Pearson Education Iimited, Essex (2007)Google Scholar
  71. Schneider, S., Sunyaev, A.: Determinant factors of cloud-sourcing decisions: reflecting on the IT outsourcing literature in the era of cloud computing. J. Inf. Technol. 31(1), 1–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Scott, R.W.: Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  73. Scott, W.R.: Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theor. Soc. 37(5), 427–442 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S., Ramakrishnan, T.: Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Q. 31(3), 467–482 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM 1994, pp. 253–264 (1994)Google Scholar
  76. Star, S.L., Ruhleder, K.: Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inf. Syst. Res. 7(1), 111–134 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sultan, N.: Making use of cloud computing for healthcare provision: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34(2), 177–184 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teo, H.H., Wei, K.K., Benbasat, I.: Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Q. 27(1), 19–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., Sorensen, C.: Desperately seeking the infrastructure in IS research: conceptualization of “digital convergence” as co-evolution of social and technical infrastructures. In: 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE 2010a, pp. 1–10 (2010a)Google Scholar
  80. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., Sørensen, C.: Digital infrastructures: the missing IS research agenda 20th anniversary special issue of emerging challenges. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(5), 748–759 (2010b)Google Scholar
  81. UNDP 2015: Human Development Report 2015, United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  82. Ure, J., et al.: The development of data infrastructures for Ehealth: a socio-technical perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(5), 3 (2009)Google Scholar
  83. Walsham, G.: Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 4(2), 74–81 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang, N., Liang, H., Jia, Y., Ge, S., Xue, Y., Wang, Z.: Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: a citation/co-citation analysis. Decis. Support Syst. 86, 35–47 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilczek, M.: IT governance critical as cloud adoption soars to 96 percent in 2018. In: CIO (2018)Google Scholar
  86. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Washington (2014)Google Scholar
  87. Youseff, L., Butrico, M., Da Silva, D.: Toward a unified ontology of cloud computing. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop, GCE 2008, IEEE 2008, pp. 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementRoyal Holloway University of LondonEghamUK
  2. 2.Muscat MunicipalityMuscatSultanate of Oman

Personalised recommendations