Advertisement

Conclusion: Changing Education in the GEI—Rationales, Logics, and Modes of Operation

  • Marcelo Parreira do AmaralEmail author
  • Christiane Thompson
Chapter

Abstract

Increasingly, as the discussions in the preceding chapters show, economic rationales and logics pervade educational thinking and practice; business strategies and modes of operation progressively penetrate the education sector with the active involvement of business actors and stakeholders. In the concluding chapter, we want to go beyond the particular expressions and manifestations of the Global Education Industry (GEI) phenomenon by discerning different but overarching rationales, logics, and modes of operation identified from a more synthetic reading of the chapters included in this volume. The chapter is rounded out by raising questions as to the social dislocations gaped open by the GEI phenomena and interrogations of theoretical lenses that guide our analyses.

References

  1. Ball, S. J. (2017). Laboring to Relate: Neoliberalism, Embodied Policy, and Network Dynamics. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bellmann, J. (2016). Datengetrieben und/oder evidenzbasiert? Wirkungsmechanismen bildungspolitischer Steuerungsansätze. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 19(Suppl. 1), 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellmann, J., & Müller, T. (Eds.). (2011). Wissen, was wirkt. Kritik evidenzbasierter Pädagogik. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The Manufactured Crisis. Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What Work” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research. Educational Theory, 47(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). (Ed.). (2008). Wissen für Handeln – Strategien für eine evidenzbasierte Bildungspolitik. Bonn/Berlin, Germany: BMBF.Google Scholar
  8. Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Centeno, V. G. (2017). The OECD’s Educational Agendas. Framed from Above, Fed from Below, Determined in Interaction. A Study on the Recurrent Education Agenda. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Give Us This Day Our Daily Dread: Manufacturing Crises in Education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 737–743. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439557
  11. Crouch, C. (2013). Interview. Five Minutes with Colin Crouch. Retrieved online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/five-minutes-with-colin-crouch/. Last 19 July 2018.
  12. Danaher, J. (2014). Rule by Algorithm? Big Data and the Threat of Algocracy. Retrieved from: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/danaher20140107. Last 19 July 2018.
  13. Danaher, J. (2017). Algocracy as Hypernudging: A New Way to Understand the Threat of Algocracy. Retrieved online: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/Danaher20170117. Last 19 July 2018.
  14. Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  15. Ertl, H. (2006). Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: The Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific Culture and Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1984). What Is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  18. FSG. (2014). The New Role of Business in Global Education. How Companies Can Create Shared Value by Improving Education While Driving Shareholder Returns. Retrieved online: https://www.fsg.org/publications/new-role-business-global-education. Last 19 July 2018.
  19. Godin, B. (2015). Innovation: A Conceptual History of an Anonymous Concept (Working Paper No. 2). Retrieved online: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/WorkingPaper21.pdf. Last 19 July 2018.
  20. Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: Some Aspects of the Extraordinary Impact of the OECD’s PISA Study on the German Education System. In H. Ertl (Ed.), Cross-National Attraction in Education: Accounts from England and Germany (pp. 195–206). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  21. Halpern, D., & Sanders, M. (2016). Nudging by Government: Progress, Impact & Lessons Learned. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartong, S. (2016a). New Structures of Power and Regulation within ‘Distributed’ Education Policy: The Example of the US Common Core State Standards Initiative. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartong, S. (2016b). Between Assessments, Digital Technologies, and Big Data: The Growing Influence of ‘Hidden’ Data Mediators in Education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartong, S. (2018). Towards a Topological Re-Assemblage of Education Policy? Observing the Implementation of Performance Data Infrastructures and ‘Centers of Calculation’ in Germany. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(1), 134–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heukelom, F. (2014). Behavioral Economics: A History. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Homann, K. (2006). Wirtschaftsethik: Ökonomischer Reduktionismus? Diskussionspapier Nr. 2006–3. Retrieved from: https://www.wcge.org/images/wissenschaft/publikationen/DP_2006-3_Homann-Wirtschaftsethik_oekonomischer_Reduktionismus.pdf. Last 19 July 2018.
  27. Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  28. Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2008). Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B., & Lépinay, V. (2008). L’économie, science des intérêts passionnés. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  30. Lingard, B., Creagh, S., & Vass, G. (2012). Education Policy as Numbers: Data Categories and Two Australian Cases of Misrecognition. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New Scalar Politics: Implications for Education Policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neckel, S. (2013). “Refeudalisierung” – Systematik und Aktualität eines Begriffs der Habermas’chen Gesellschaftanalyse. Leviathan, 41(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Ozga, J. (2009). Governing Education Through Data in England: From Regulation to Self-Evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peters, M. A., Paraskeva, J. M., & Besley, T. (Eds.). (2015). The Global Financial Crisis and Educational Restructuring. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Porter, M. E. (2014). Foreword. In FSG, The New Role of Business in Global Education. How Companies Can Create Shared Value by Improving Education While Driving Shareholder Returns. Retrieved online: https://www.fsg.org/publications/new-role-business-global-education. Last 19 July 2018.
  37. Radtke, F.-O. (2016). Konditionierte Strukturverbesserung. Umbau und Neuformierung der deutschen Erziehungswissenschaft flankiert von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft unter Anleitung der OECD verwirklicht von der Kultusministerkonferenz. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 62(5), 707–731.Google Scholar
  38. Reckwitz, A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Simon, H. A. (1984). On the Behavioral and Rational Foundations of Economic Dynamics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Education Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Educational Research: A Critique. London: OFSTED.Google Scholar
  43. Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). The Emergence and Structuring of the Global Education Industry. Towards an Analytical Framework. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), The Global Education Industry (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Vogl, J. (2015). Der Souveränitätseffekt. Zürich, Switzerland: Diaphanes.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo Parreira do Amaral
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christiane Thompson
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Theory and History of EducationGoethe-University Frankfurt am MainFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations