Advertisement

Towards an Optimized Semantic Interoperability Framework for IoT-Based Smart Home Applications

  • Sivadi BalakrishnaEmail author
  • M. Thirumaran
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 154)

Abstract

Nowadays, in the Internet of Things (IoT) applications, semantic interoperability is the new and disruptive buzzword for exchange the resources information in a consistent manner. Billions of heterogeneous resources are connected to the internet, not only from sensors and actuators but also from various IoT deployment models, a huge variety of data, high volume of data and low-level descriptive resources. Semantic interoperability problem is carried out in these heterogeneous IoT resources. To accomplish semantic interoperability in the Internet of Things (IoT) is a vital challenge. In retort to this, towards an optimized semantic interoperability framework has been proposed for generating the resources automatically. The corresponding semantic graphs are determining through IoT-based smart home resources from RESTful principles and to do operational behavioral of implicit links among IoT resources. In this chapter, the smart home resources have been taken and implemented through Restlet framework. Then the generated RDF graph is semantically interoperable and intercommunicated between the IoT based smart home resources. The proposed framework has been implemented on IoT-based cloud platform and has been compared with the existing state of the art schemes with obtained results. Finally, the obtained results show that the proposed framework is optimized towards the semantic interoperability in IoT domains for smart home applications.

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT) Semantic interoperability smart home RESTful Restlet RDF 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Petrolo, R., Loscri, V., Mitton, N.: Towards a smart city based on cloud of things, a survey on the smart city vision and paradigms. T. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., IEEE, 28(1), pp. 1–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson, L., Ruby, S.: Farnham O’Reilly “RESTful web service” (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haslhofer, B., Klas, W.: A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability. ACM Comput. Surv. 42(2), 1–37 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibrahim, N.M., Hassan, M.F.: A Survey on Different Interoperability Frameworks of SOA Systems towards Seamless Interoperability. In: Information Technology (ITSim), 2010 International Symposium in, vol. 3, pp. 1119–1123 (2010) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, Z., Wu, C., Cheung, D.W.: A survey on cloud interoperability: taxonomies, standards, and practice. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eva. Rev. 40(4), 13–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    GSMA.: IoT Big Data Harmonised Data Model (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    OneM2M Technical Specification.: Base Ontology (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters, W.: Establishing Interoperability Between Linguistic and Terminological Ontologies, pp. 27–42 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehti, P., Fankhauser, P.: XML data integration with OWL: Experiences and challenges. In: Applications and the Internet, pp. 160–167 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thuy, P.T.T., Lee, Y.-K., Lee, S., Jeong, B.-S.: Exploiting XML Schema for Interpreting XML Documents as RDF, pp. 555–558 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andrews, P., Zaihrayeu, I., Pane, J.: A Classification Of Semantic Annotation Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saquicela, V., Vilches-Blázquez, L.M., Corcho, Ó.: Semantic annotation of RESTful services using external resources, Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khaled, A.E., Helal, S.: Interoperable communication framework for bridging RESTful and topic-based communication in IoT. In: Future Generation Computer Systems, pp. 1–24. Elsevier, (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacoby, M., Antonic, A., Kreiner, K., Lapacz, R., Pielorz, J.: “Semantic interoperability as key to IoT platform federation” in LNCS 10218: Interoperability and Open-Source for the Internet of Things, pp. 3–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plageras, A.P., Psannis, K.E., Stergiou, C., Wang, H., Gupta, B.B.: Efficient IoT-based sensor BIG Data collection-processing and analysis in Smart Buildings. In: Future Generation Computer Systems, pp. 1–16. Elsevier (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghayvat, H., Mukhopadhyay, S., Gui, X., Suryadevar, N.: WSN-and IOT-based smart homes and their extension to smart buildings. Sensors 15(5), 10350–10379 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soliman, M., Abiodun, T., Hamouda, T., Zhou, J., Lung, C.H.: Smart home: Integrating Internet of Things with web services and cloud computing. In: IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 317–320 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin, H.T.: Implementing smart homes with open source solutions. Int. J. Smart Home 7(4), 289–295 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Antunes, M., Gomes, D., Aguiar, R.: Towards IoT data classification through semantic features. In: Future Generation Computer Systems, pp. 1–14. (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, C., Zappaterra, L., Choi, K., Choi, H.A.: Securing smart home: Technologies, security challenges, and security requirements. In: IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS), IEEE, pp. 67–72 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cardoso, J., Sheth, A. (eds.): Semantic Web Services, Processes and Applications. Springer, New York (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nottingham M.: Web Linking. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988, IETF (2017)
  25. 25.
    Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Link Format.: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6690
  26. 26.
    Mayer, S., Guinard, D.: An Extensible Discovery Service for Smart Things. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Web of Things (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., Woltran, S.: Redundancy Elimination on Rdf Graphs in the Presence of Rules, Constraints, and Queries. In: Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, Springer, pp. 133–148 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan, S., Safyan, M.: Semantic matching in hierarchical ontologies. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inform. Sci., 26(3), 247–257, Elsevier (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheatham, M., Hitzler, P.: String Similarity Metrics for Ontology Alignment. In: The Semantic Web–ISWC 2013, Springer, pp. 294–309 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Wang, P., Zhou, F.: Mining Link Patterns in Linked Data. In: Web-Age Information Management, Springer, pp. 83–94 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gao, J., Mazumdar, S.: Exploiting Linked Open Data to Uncover Entity Types. Presented at the Semantic Web Evaluation Challenge, pp. 51–62 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
    Linked Open Vocabularies.: http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CSEPondicherry Engineering College, Pondicherry UniversityPondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations