Referendums and Institutional Theory
Most referendum research is inspired by sociological institutionalist theory and traces the use of referendums back to an alleged crisis of representative democracy. The aim of referendum research is usually not to explain why referendums are designed in different ways in different countries, nor why political actors in some countries are more likely to use them. To provide a better understanding of referendum practices, and how that varies among countries, this chapter provides an analytical framework that combines sociological institutionalism with insights from classical institutionalism, which places strong emphasis on a country’s existing institutional context, historical institutionalism, which examines the role of path dependency in choices to institutionalize and use referendums, and rational choice institutionalism, which explains referendums in terms of political actors’ strategic interests.
KeywordsClassical institutionalism Historical institutionalism Sociological institutionalism Rational choice institutionalism
- Amenta, E., and K.M. Ramsey. 2010. Institutional Theory. In Handbook of Politics: State and Society in Global Perspective, ed. K.T. Leicht and J.C. Jenkins. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
- Anscombe, G.E.M. 1981. Ethics, Religion and Politics: Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe. Vol. 3. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Auer, A., and M. Bützer, eds. 2001. Direct Democracy. The Eastern and Central European Experience. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Barber, B.R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2000. When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. European Integration Online Papers 4 (15). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2000-015.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2013.
- Budge, I. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Butler, D., and A. Ranney. 1978. Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
- Cain, B.E., R.J. Dalton, and S.E. Scarrow, eds. 2003. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cronin, T.E. 1999. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Crum, B., and S. Hollander. 2011. Can the EU Referendum Genie Be Put Back in the Bottle? Paper Presented at the RECON WP2-Workshop on ‘European Constitutional Pluralism and the Constitution of the Union’, Madrid, November 10–11, on File with the Author.Google Scholar
- Da Cunha Rezende, F. 2011. Do Institutions Produce Institutional Change? The New Historical Institutionalism and Analytic Innovations in the Theory of Change. Brazilian Political Science Review 5 (1): 129–152.Google Scholar
- Easton, D. 1953. The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- ———. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Fiorino, N., and R. Ricciuti. 2007. Determinants of Direct Democracy. CESifo Working Paper No. 2035. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_2035.html. Accessed 18 June 2015.
- Geddes, B. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Häusermann, S., and H. Schwander. 2009. Identifying Outsiders Across Countries: Similarities and Differences in the Patterns of Dualisation. REC-WP Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe No. 09-2009. Edinburgh: RECWOWE Publication, Dissemination and Dialogue Centre. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1489943. Accessed 5 June 2014.
- Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2004. European Integration and Democratic Competition. Paper Prepared for the virtual Europolity Conference of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. http://www.fes.de/europolity/finalversionhooghText.PDF. Accessed 15 Feb 2014.
- Huntington, S.P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, K. 2011. The Power or the People: Direct Democratic and Electoral Reforms in Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands (diss.). Ede: Ponsen en Looijen.Google Scholar
- Jung, S. 1996. Lijpharts Demokratietypen und die Direkte Demokratie. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 6 (3): 623–645.Google Scholar
- Kriesi, H. 2014. The Political Consequences of the Economic Crisis in Europe: Electoral Punishment and Popular protest. In Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, ed. N. Bermeo and L.M. Bartels, 297–233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- LeDuc, L. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Lucardie, P. 1997. Vox Populi, Vox Diaboli? Het Debat over het Referendum in de Nederlandse Politieke Partijen. In Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen 1996, ed. G. Voerman, 109–128. Groningen: Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen.Google Scholar
- ———. 2010. Nederlandse Politieke Partijen en het Referendum: Wordt de Links- Rechts Tegenstelling doorbroken? Civis Mundi, September 28.Google Scholar
- Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marxer, W., and Z.T. Pállinger. 2007. ‘System Contexts and System Effects on Direct Democracy – Direct Democracy in Liechtenstein and Switzerland Compared. In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects, ed. Z.T. Pállinger, B. Kaufmann, W. Marxer, and T. Schiller, 12–29. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maslow, A.H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Norris, P., ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Oppermann, K. 2011. The Strategic Use of Referendum Pledges in Two-level Games: The Case of Discretionary Commitments to Popular Consultations on European Integration. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 3rd Global International Studies Conference, University of Porto, August 17–20. http://www.wiscnetwork.org/porto2011/papers/WISC_2011-659.pdf
- Osbun, L.A. 1985. The Problem of Participation: A Radical Critique of Contemporary Democratic Theory. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
- Pállinger, Z.T., B. Kaufmann, W. Marxer, and T. Schiller, eds. 2007. Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
- Pierson, P., and T. Skocpol. 2002. Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. I. Katznelson and H.V. Milner, 693–721. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Pilet, J.-B. 2007. Changer pour Gagner? Les Réformes des Lois Électorales en Belgique. Brussels: Editions de l’Universite de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
- Qvortrup, M. 2005. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Rahat, G. 2008. The Politics of Regime Structure Reform in Democracies. Israel in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2009. Elite Motives for Initiating Referendums: Avoidance, Addition and Contradiction. In Referendums and Representative Democracy: Responsiveness, Accountability, and Deliberation, ed. M. Setälä and T. Schiller, 98–111. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Reed, S.R., and M.F. Thies. 2001. The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan. In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? ed. M.S. Shugart and M.P. Wattenberg, 152–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2008. Bringing Ideas and Discourse Back into the Explanation of Change in Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare States. Centre for Global Political Economy, Working Paper No. 2, 1–25, May 2008. https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=cgpe-wp02-vivien-a-schmidt.pdf&site=359. Accessed 15 Feb 2013.
- Sewell, W.H., Jr. 2006. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Thelen, K., and S. Steinmo. 1992. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, ed. S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- WRR (Scientific Council for Government Policy). 2007. Rediscovering Europe in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar