Sectoral Views on Police and Judicial Cooperation

  • Helena CarrapicoEmail author
  • Antonia Niehuss
  • Chloé Berthélémy
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)


This chapter offers short expert views on different aspects of police and judicial cooperation, including De Vries’ contribution on cooperation regarding counterterrorism and the fight against organised crime; Bossong and Rieger’s exploration of future data sharing options for police cooperation; Trauner’s piece on the negotiations regarding the UK’s future participation in Europol; Wilson and Carr’s discussion of future cooperation in Forensic Science; and MacKenzie’s considerations on the UK’s role in EU counter-terrorism policy. This chapter also encompasses a number of expert views that focus specifically on security threats, including Sergi’s analysis of Brexit creating opportunities for transnational criminal networks; Farrand’s exploration of Brexit’s impact on combatting counterfeiting; and Porcedda’s and Lavorgna’s pieces on the consequences of Brexit for the UK and the EU in the area of cybersecurity.


Brexit Police and judicial cooperation Transnational organised crime Terrorism Cybercrime Europol Eurojust Databases 


  1. Asthana, A., D. Boffey, H. Stewart, and P. Walker. 2017. Don’t Blackmail Us Over Security, EU Warns May. The Guardian, 30 March. Available from Last accessed 27 May 2018.
  2. Bada, M., I. Arreguín-Toft, I. Brown, P. Cornish, S. Creese, W. Dutton, M. Goldsmith, E. Ignatuschtschenko, L. Pace, L. Pijnenburg Muller, T. Roberts, S. Von Solms, and D. Upton. 2016. Cyber Security Capacity Review of the United Kingdom. Oxford: Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre, University of Oxford. Google Scholar
  3. BBC. 2016. Staying in EU ‘Exposes UK to Terror Risk’, Says Iain Duncan Smith, 21 February. Available from: Last accessed 30 April 2018.
  4. Blitz, J. 2017. Why Dover Is Braced for Customs Gridlock After Brexit. Financial Times, 18 October. Available from: Last accessed 19 May 2018.
  5. Carr, S., A. Gallop, E. Piasecki, G. Tully, and T.J. Wilson. (forthcoming). Clarifying the “Reliability” Continuum and Testing Its Limits: Biometric (Fingerprint and DNA) Expert Evidence. In Forensic Science Evidence and Expert Witness Testimony: Reliability Through Reform? ed. R. Roberts and M. Stockdale. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Carrapico, H., and F. Trauner. 2013. Europol and Its Impact on EU Policy-Making on Organised Crime. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14 (3): 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrapico, H., C. Berthélemy, and A. Niehuss. 2017. Better Safe Than Sorry? Brexit and Internal Security. Report for the UK in a Changing Europe Funding Initative. Birmingham: Aston University.Google Scholar
  8. Carrera, S., E. Guild, and N. Chun Luk. 2016. What Does Brexit Mean for the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice? CEPS Commentary. Available from: Last accessed 28 March 2018.
  9. Cremona, M. 2016. A Triple Braid: Interactions Between International Law, EU Law and Private Law. In Private Law in the External Relation of the EU, ed. M. Cremona and H.-W. Micklitz, 33–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Daily Mail. 2017. Prime Minister Theresa May: How I Will Make Brexit a Success for Everyone, 6 September 2017. Available from: Last accessed 28 March 2018.
  11. Davies, R., and J. Burke. 2017. Labout Demands Review into City of London Role in Money Laundering. The Guardian, 19 October. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  12. Dearden, L. 2017. London Terror Attack Suspect Was British-Born and Previously Investigated by MI5 Over Extremism, May Confirms. Independent, 23 March. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  13. Department for Exiting the Union. 2018. The Future Relationship Between the United Kingdom and the European Union. Available from: Last accessed 12 July 2018.
  14. European Commission. 2015. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM (2015) 192 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. 2016. Proposal for a Directive Establishing the European Electronic Communications Code, (Communication) COM (2016) 590 final, 2016/0288 (COD).Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. 2017a. Position Paper Transmitted to EU27 on the Use of Data and Protection of Information Obtained or Processed Before the Withdrawal Date, TF50 (2017) 14. Available from: Last accessed 18 December 2017.
  17. European Commission. 2017b. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ENISA, the “EU Cybersecurity Agency”, and Repealing Regulation (EU) 526/2013, and on Information and Communication Technology Cybersecurity Certification (“Cybersecurity Act”), COM (2017) 495 final.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. 2018a. Proposal for a Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters, COM (2018) 225 final 2018/0108 (COD).Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. 2018b. Report on the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Third Countries, SWD (2018) 47 final.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2018c. Draft Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, as Agreed at Negotiators’ Level on 14 November 2018, TF50 (2018) 55. Available from: 14 November 2018.
  21. European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. 2013. Cyber Security Strategy: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace, (Joint Communication) JOIN (2013) 01 final.Google Scholar
  22. European Parliament. 2017. The European Union’s Policies on Counter-Terrorism Relevance, Coherence and Effectiveness. LIBE Committee. Available from: Last accessed 18 December 2017.
  23. European Parliament. 2018. European Parliament Resolution of 14 March 2018 on the Framework of the Future EU-UK Relationship, 2018/2573.Google Scholar
  24. Europol and European Union Intellectual Property Office. 2017. 2017 Situation Report on Counterfeiting in the European Union.Google Scholar
  25. European Union and United Kingdom. 2018. Joint Report from the Negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government on the State of Play of the Negotiations Under Article 50 TEU on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, TF50 (2018) 54, 14 November 2018.Google Scholar
  26. Falvey, D. 2017. ‘Borders at Risk’ After ‘Inadequate’ Home Office Planning Could Leave ‘Brexit in Jeopardy’. Express, 16 November. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  27. Farrand, B. 2018. Combatting Physical Threats Posed via Digital Means: The European Commission’s Developing Approach to the Sale of Counterfeit Goods on the Internet. European Politics and Society 19 (3): 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gelder, S. 2017. Tommy Adams Jailed: Brother from Notorious Islington Crime Family Gets Seven Years for Money Laundering. Islington Gazette, 2 November. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  29. Hillebrand, C. 2017. With or Without You: The UK and Information and Intelligence Sharing in the EU. Journal of Intelligence History 16 (2): 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. HM Government. 2017a. Security, Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice: A Future Partnership. Available from: Last accessed 22 March 2018.
  31. HM Government. 2017b. The United Kingdom’s Exit from and New Partnership with the European Union. Available from: Last accessed 18 December 2017.
  32. House of Commons. 2011. The Forensic Science Service. Science and Technology Committee, 2nd Report of Session 2010–12, HC 855.Google Scholar
  33. House of Commons. 2013. Forensic Science. Science and Technology Committee, 2nd Report of Session 2013–14, HC 610.Google Scholar
  34. House of Commons. 2017a. EU-Canada Agreement on Passenger Name Record Data. European Scrutiny Committee. Available from: Last accessed 30 April 2018.
  35. House of Commons. 2017b. Implications of Brexit for the Justice System. Justice Committee, 9th Report of Session 2016–17, HC 750.Google Scholar
  36. House of Commons. 2018. The Land Border Between Northern Ireland and Ireland. Northern Ireland Affairs Committee. Available from: Last accessed 14 May 2018.
  37. House of Lords. 2016. Brexit: Future UK-EU Security and Police Cooperation. European Union Committee, 7th Report of Session 2016–2017.Google Scholar
  38. House of Lords. 2017. Brexit: The EU Data Protection Package. European Union Committee. Available from: Last accessed 18 December 2017.
  39. House of Lords. 2018. Brexit: Common Security and Defence Policy. European Union Committee, 16th Report of Session 2017–19. Available from: Last accessed 27 May 2018.
  40. Huysmans, J. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Inkster, N. 2016. Brexit, Intelligence, and Terrorism. Survival 58 (3): 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. 2016. The Foreign Fighters Phenomenon in the European Union Profiles, Threats & Policies. Available from: Last accessed 18 December 2017.
  43. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. 2018. The Homecoming of Foreign Fighters in the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium: Policies and Challenges. Available from: Last accessed 30 April 2018.
  44. Kjeldsen, T., and W. Nueteboom. 2015. 20 Years of Forensic Cooperation in Europe: The History of ENFSI 1995–2015. The Hague: ENFSI.Google Scholar
  45. Lavorgna, A., and A. Sergi. 2016. Serious, Therefore Organised? A Critique of the Emerging “Cyber-Organised Crime” Rhetoric in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 10 (2): 170–187.Google Scholar
  46. London Loves Business (LLB). 2017. Money Launderers Paid £1.8m into London Banks in Two Weeks. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  47. MacAskill, E., and D. Boffey. 2018. Brexit Row: GCHQ Chief Stresses UK’s Role in Foiling European Terror Plots. The Guardian. Available from: Last accessed 19 June 2018.
  48. May, T. 2018. PM Speech at Munich Security Conference: 17 February 2018. Available from: Last accessed 24 March 2018.
  49. McDonald, M. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitsilegas, V. 2017. The United Kingdom in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice. The Triple Paradox of Brexit. Criminology in Europe 16 (2): 9–10.Google Scholar
  51. National Crime Agency. 2017. National Strategic Assessment of Serious and Organised Crime. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  52. Neil, R. 2017. HC Deb, 18 January 2017, vol. 619, cols. 956–957.Google Scholar
  53. OLAF. 2017. The OLAF Report 2016. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  54. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2006. The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. OECD.Google Scholar
  55. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2008. The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Available from: Last accessed on 24 April 2018.
  56. Payne, A. 2017. Theresa May’s ‘Blackmail’ Security Threat to the EU Had to Be ‘Toned Down’. Business Insider, 20 April. Available from: Last accessed 27 May 2018.
  57. Porcedda, M.G. 2018. Patching the Patchwork: Appraising the EU Regulatory Framework on Cyber Security Breaches. Computer Law and Security Review 34 (5): 1077–1098. Google Scholar
  58. Porcedda, M.G., and D.S. Wall. 2018. Data Science, Data Crime and the Law. In Research Handbook on Data Science & Law, ed. V. Mak, E. Tjong Tjin Tai, and A. Berlee. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  59. Ripoll Servent, A., and A. MacKenzie. 2012. The European Parliament as a ‘Norm Taker’? EU-US Relations After the SWIFT Agreement. European Foreign Affairs Review 17 (2/1): 71–86.Google Scholar
  60. Ripoll Servent, A., and A. MacKenzie. 2017. Eroding Germany’s Commitment to Data Protection: Policy Entrepreneurs and Coalition Politics in EU Passenger Name Records. German Politics 26 (3): 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Robert, A. 2016. Big Data Revolutionises Europe’s Fight Against Terrorism., 23 June. Available from: Last accessed 28 March 2018.
  62. Sandler, T. 2006. Recognizing the Limits to Cooperation Behind National Borders: Financing the Control of Transnational Terrorism. In The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges, ed. I. Kaul and P. Conceiçao. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sergi, A. 2017. From Mafia to Organised Crime: A Comparative Analysis of Policing Models. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  64. Sergi, A. 2018. What’s Really Going on in London’s Organised Crime Scene: According to a Criminologist. Independent, 24 January. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  65. Sharf, E. 2016. Information Exchanges. Regulatory Changes to the Cyber-Security Industry After Brexit: Making Security Awareness Training Work. Computer Fraud & Security 7: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sidharth, K. 2011. Supply and Demand: Human Trafficking in the Global Economy. Harvard International Review 33 (2): 66–71.Google Scholar
  67. Slack, J., and T. Cohen. 2016. Quitting EU Would Make Britain Safer, Says Former MI6 Chief: Sir Richard Dearlove Suggests Brexit Would Make It Easier to Deport Terrorists and Control Our Borders. The Daily Mail, 23 March. Available from: Last accessed 27 May 2018.
  68. Soleto Muñoz, H., and A. Fiodorova. 2014. DNA and Law Enforcement in the European Union: Tools and Human Rights Protection. Utrecht Law Review 10 (1): 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Talani, L.S. 2013. London: The Laundry of Choice? Money Laundering in the City of London. In Dirty Cities: Towards a Political Economy of the Underground in Global Cities, ed. L.S. Talani, A. Clarkson, and R.P. Pardo. Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Taverne, M.D., and A.P.A. Broeders. 2015. The Light’s at the End of the Funnel!: Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Transnational Exchange of DNA Profiles Between the Netherlands and Other Prüm Countries. Zutphen: Paris Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  71. The Economist. 2018. Gangster’s Paradise: Brexit Presents New Opportunities for Organised Crime, 24 January. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  72. The Telegraph. 2017. Exclusive: Brexit Should Have No Impact ‘Whatsoever’ on Links with Europol, Says Anti-slavery Commissioner., 28 August. Available from: Last accessed 28 March 2018.
  73. Treadwell, J. 2012. From the Car Boot to Booting It Up? eBay, Online Counterfeit Crime and the Transformation of the Criminal Marketplace. Criminology and Criminal Justice 12 (2): 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Treadwell, J., and T. Ayres. 2014. Talking Prada and Powder: Cocaine Use and Supply Among the Football Hooligan Firm. In Football Hooliganism, Fan Behaviour and Crime, ed. M. Hopkins and J. Treadwell. Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Wall, D.S. 2016. Policing Cybercrime in the EU: Shall I Stay or Shall I Go? British Society of Criminology Newsletter 78 (Summer).Google Scholar
  76. Wilson, T. 2015. The Global Perspective. In Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2015: Forensic Science and Beyond: Authenticity, Provenance and Assurance: Evidence and Case Studies, ed. M. Peplow. London: Government Office for Science.Google Scholar
  77. Wilson, T.J. 2016. Criminal Justice and Global Public Goods: The Prüm Forensic Biometric Cooperation Model. The Journal of Criminal Law 80 (5): 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson, T.J. 2018. The Implementation and Practical Application of the European Investigation Order in the United Kingdom: An Academic Perspective. In Los avances del espacio de Libertad, Seguridad y Justicia de la UE en 2017: II Anuario de la Red Española de Derecho Penal Europeo (ReDPE), ed. Á. Gutiérrez Zarza. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer edit.Google Scholar
  79. Winstock, A.R. 2015. What Did We Learn from GDS2015? An Overview of Our Key Findings, Global Drug Survey 2015. Available from: Last accessed 15 May 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Carrapico
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonia Niehuss
    • 2
  • Chloé Berthélémy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsAston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of International RelationsUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.Sciences Po LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations