Advertisement

Sectoral Views on Brexit and Future UK-EU Internal Security Relations

  • Helena Carrapico
  • Antonia Niehuss
  • Chloé Berthélémy
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

This chapter presents an array of short expert views on Brexit and future UK-EU relations with regard to internal security. It consisting of both Fichera’s and Ripoll Servent’s discussions of Brexit’s impact on the future development of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ); Mortera-Martinez’s analysis of the two parties’ negotiation stances shaping future cooperation; and Fahey’s reflection upon how transatlantic relations can inform future UK-EU cooperation in internal security.

Keywords

Brexit The area of freedom, security and justice Post-Brexit Institutional governance Stability Transatlantic relations 

References

  1. Adler-Nissen, R. 2009. Behind the Scenes of Differentiated Integration: Circumventing National Opt-Outs in Justice and Home Affairs. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (1): 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alegre, S., D. Bigo, E. Guild, E.M. Kuskonmaz, H. Ben Jaffel, and J. Jeandesboz. 2017. The Implications of the United Kingdom’s Withdrawal from the European Union for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Report to the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2017)596824. Last accessed 31 May 2018.
  3. Bárd, P. 2018. The Effect of Brexit on European Arrest Warrants. Centre for European Policy Studies Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, No. 2018-02, April.Google Scholar
  4. Council of Europe Treaty Series. 2013. No. 214. Protocol No. 16 to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Strasbourg, 2.X.2013.Google Scholar
  5. Court of Justice. 2014. Opinion 2/13 Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 18 December 2014, EU:C:2014:2454.Google Scholar
  6. Court of Justice. 2015. Case C-362/14 Schrems v Data Commissioner, EU:C:2015:650.Google Scholar
  7. Court of Justice. 2017. Opinion 1/15 of the Grand Chamber ECLI:EU:C:2017:592 (EU-Canada PNR Agreement).Google Scholar
  8. Court of Justice. 2018. C-284/16, Judgment ECLI:EU:C:2018:158, 6 March 2018.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission and HM Government. 2018. Draft Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/691366/20180319_DRAFT_WITHDRAWAL_AGREEMENT.pdf. Last accessed 26 March 2018.
  10. Fahey, E. 2016. Joining the Dots: External Norms, AFSJ Directives and the EU’s Role in the Global Legal Order. European Law Review 41: 105.Google Scholar
  11. Fahey, E. 2017. The Evolution of Transatlantic Legal Integration: Truly, Madly, Deeply? EU-US Justice and Home Affairs. In Routledge Handbook on Justice and Home Affairs, ed. F. Trauner and A. Rippoll-Servent. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Fahey, E. (ed.). 2018. Institutionalisation Beyond the Nation State: Transatlantic Data Privacy and Trade Law. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. HM Government. 2017. Security, Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice: A Future Partnership. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/645416/Security__law_enforcement_and_criminal_justice_-_a_future_partnership_paper.PDF. Last accessed 22 March 2018.
  14. House of Lords. 2017. Brexit: Judicial Oversight of the European Arrest Warrant. European Union Committee, 27 July.Google Scholar
  15. Larik, J. 2017. Brexit and the Transatlantic Trouble of Counting Treaties. EJIL Talk! 6 December.Google Scholar
  16. Mitsilegas, V. 2017. The United Kingdom in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice. The Triple Paradox of Brexit. Criminology in Europe 16 (2): 9–10.Google Scholar
  17. Moreno-Lax, V. 2017. Accessing Asylum in Europe: Extraterritorial Border Controls and Refugee Rights Under EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  18. Mortera-Martinez, C. 2018. Plugging in the British: EU Justice and Home Affairs. Policy Brief, Centre for European Reform, May.Google Scholar
  19. Peers, S. 2018. Differentiated Integration and the Brexit Process in EU Justice and Home Affairs. In The Routledge Handbook of Justice and Home Affairs Research, ed. A. Ripoll Servent and F. Trauner, 253–263. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Politico. 2018. Europe’s Terror Defenses Pass to Belgian Hands, 2 May. Available from: https://www.politico.eu/article/europol-europes-terror-defenses-pass-to-belgian-hands-eu-law-enforcement-agency-catherine-de-bolle/. Last accessed 22 May 2018.
  21. Ripoll Servent, A. 2015. Institutional and Policy Change in the European Parliament: Deciding on Freedom, Security and Justice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weyembergh, A. 2017. Consequences of Brexit for European Union Criminal Law. New Journal of European Criminal Law 8 (3): 284–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Carrapico
    • 1
  • Antonia Niehuss
    • 2
  • Chloé Berthélémy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsAston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of International RelationsUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.Sciences Po LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations