Advertisement

Introduction

  • Helena CarrapicoEmail author
  • Antonia Niehuss
  • Chloé Berthélémy
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

This book explores the viability of future UK-EU internal security arrangements, including their impact on the UK’s security and international standing, by departing from the current relationship between the two parties, discussing on-going negotiations, and addressing the main political and legal concerns arising from different possible arrangements. As the UK prepares to leave the EU, it is faced with having to develop new forms of cooperation with its neighbours to fight ever more transnational security threats, as well as new strategies to maintain its leading role as an international security actor. As outlined in this introductory chapter, the book has three main objectives: to contribute to the general knowledge on the risks and opportunities associated with the disentanglement of the UK from European internal security cooperation; to clarify some of the debates currently taking place within the context of the negotiations; and to inform the policy discussions which form the basis of proposed cooperation models, and which are likely to shape the future UK-EU security relationship significantly.

Keywords

European union Brexit Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Political and legal consequences 

References

  1. European Commission. 2009. Awareness of Key Policies in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice-Analytical Report. Eurobarometer Survey, January.Google Scholar
  2. European Commission. 2011. Internal Security—Report, Special Eurobarometer 371, November.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. 2017. European Attitudes Towards Security—Special Eurobarometer 464b Report. Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs and Directorate-General for Communication, December.Google Scholar
  4. Prime Minister’s Office. 2017a. The Government’s Negotiating Objectives for Exiting the EU: PM Speech. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-governments-negotiating-objectives-for-exiting-the-eu-pm-speech. Last accessed 31 May 2018.
  5. Prime Minister’s Office. 2017b. Prime Minister’s Letter to Donal Tusk Triggering Article 50. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prime-ministers-letter-to-donald-tusk-triggering-article-50. Last accessed 31 May 2018.
  6. Reuters. 2016. EU Exit Could Make Britain Safer—Former MI6 Spy Chief, 24 March. Available from: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-security/eu-exit-could-make-britain-safer-former-mi6-spy-chief-idUKKCN0WQ0NE. Last accessed 31 May 2018.
  7. Smith, M. 2017. Nine in Ten Brits Think Further Terror Attacks Are Likely, YouGov Survey, 24 March. Available from: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2017/03/24/nine-ten-brits-think-further-terror-attacks-are-li/. Last accessed 31 May 2018.
  8. The Guardian. 2016. Nigel Farage Defends Linking Brussels Attacks and EU Migration Rules. Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-35879670. Last accessed 31 May 2018.
  9. Warrell, H. 2017. Terror Attacks Shaped UK Election But Failed to Lift May. Financial Times, 8 June. Available from: https://www.voanews.com/a/terror-attacks-may-drive-security-issues-upcoming-brexit-talks/3889359.html. Last accessed 15 May 2018.
  10. Wright, R. 2018. Europol Head Warns of Security Impediments After Brexit. Financial Times, 7 March. Available from: https://www.ft.com/content/b74ec3d0-2213-11e8-9a70-08f715791301. Last accessed 31 May 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Carrapico
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonia Niehuss
    • 2
  • Chloé Berthélémy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Politics and International RelationsAston UniversityBirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of International RelationsUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  3. 3.Sciences Po LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations