Advertisement

Role of Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Access, Chest Tube Insertion, and Interventional Management of Cholecystitis in ICU Patients

  • Steven M. YevichEmail author
  • Rahul A. Sheth
Chapter
Part of the Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach book series (DDSURGERY)

Abstract

Ultrasound guidance has been advocated as a method to potentially improve percutaneous treatment success and reduce complication rates associated with traditional surgical approaches. Procedural applications for the cardiothoracic critical care surgical patient include central venous access, insertion of chest tubes, and management of cholecystitis. The use of realtime ultrasound in central venous access has received high grade recommendations for the reduction of procedural complications, with impact more apparent in the access of the internal jugular vein compared to the subclavian or femoral veins. In the treatment of pneumothorax and pleural fluid collections, the ultrasound placement of small bore drains has similar outcomes to the conventional insertion of large bore drains placed via blunt dissection by the available low level evidence. The treatment of cholecystitis in the ICU patient by ultrasound guided gallbladder aspiration or cholecystostomy tube placement has low quality evidence to suggest a high technical success rate and low immediate procedural complication rate, despite procedural technical variability. While these ultrasound guided techniques appear to provide a safe treatment alternative to urgent or emergent cholecystectomy in the high risk patient, low level evidence suggests use as a temporizing treatment to shortly thereafter bridge for cholecystectomy.

Keywords

ICU Ultrasound Central venous access Chest tube Thoracostomy Gallbladder aspiration Cholecystostomy Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(1):CD006962.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(1):CD011447.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lalu MM, Fayad A, Ahmed O, Bryson GL, Fergusson DA, Barron CC, Sullivan P, Thompson C. Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(7):1498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rabindranath KS, Kumar E, Shail R, Vaux EC. Ultrasound use for the placement of haemodialysis catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD005279.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, Reeves ST. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(12):1291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rupp SM, Apfelbaum JL, Blitt C, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Domino KB, Fleisher LA, Grant S, Mark JB, Morray JP, Nickinovich DG, Tung A. Practice guidelines for central venous access: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(3):539–73.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamperti M, Bodenham AR, Pittiruti M, Blaivas M, Augoustides JG, Elbarbary M, Pirotte T, Karakitsos D, Ledonne J, Doniger S, Scoppettuolo G, Feller-Kopman D, Schummer W, Biffi R, Desruennes E, Melniker LA, Verghese ST. International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(7):1105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Desai H, Evans D, Summerfield DT, Slonim A, Breitkreutz R, Price S, Marik PE, Talmor D, Levitov A. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients-part I: general ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(11):2479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jenssen C, Brkljacic B, Hocke M, Ignee A, Piscaglia F, Radzina M, Sidhu PS, Dietrich CF. EFSUMB guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS). Part VI-ultrasound-guided vascular interventions. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37(5):473–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bodenham A, Babu S, Bennett J, Binks R, Fee P, Fox B, Johnston AJ, Klein AA, Langton JA, McLure H, Tighe SQM. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: safe vascular access 2016. Anesthesia. 2016;71(5):573–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin YC, Tu CT, Liang SJ, Chen HJ, Chen W, Hsia TC, Shih CM, Hsu WH. Pigtail catheter for the management of pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(4):466–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Contou D, Razazi K, Katsahian S, Maitre B, Mekontso-Dessap A, Brun-Buisson C, Thille AW. Small-bore catheter versus chest tube drainage for pneumothorax. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1407–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liang SJ, Tu CY, Chen HJ, Chen CH, Chen W, Shih CM, Hsu WH. Application of ultrasound-guided pigtail catheter for drainage of pleural effusions in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(2):350–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rassameehiran S, Tantrachoti P, Nugent K. Percutaneous gallbladder aspiration for acute cholecystitis. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2016;29(4):381–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Komatsu S, Tsuchida S, Tsukamoto T, Wakahara T, Ashitani H, Ueno N, Toyokawa A, Watanabe A, Sugahara A, Mukai H. Current role of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration: from palliative to curative management for acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(11):708–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Kimura K, Sugawara T, Horaguchi J. Percutaneous cholecystostomy versus gallbladder aspiration for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(1):193–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandstrom P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Friedrich AU, Baratta KP, Lewis J, Karam AR, Hudlin M, Litwin DE, Cahan MA. Cholecystostomy treatment in an ICU population: complications and risks. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26(5):410–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamada K, Yamashita Y, Yamada T, Takeno S, Noritomi T. Optimal timing for performing percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and subsequent cholecystectomy for better management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepato-Biliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22(12):855–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gurusamy KS, Rossi M, Davidson BR. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):CD007088.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall BR, Armijo PR, Krause C, Burnett T, Oleynikov D. Emergent cholecystectomy is superior to percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement in critically ill patients with emergent calculous cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schafer M. Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg. 2011;35(4):826–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kortram K, van Ramshorst B, Bollen TL, Besselink MG, Gouma DJ, Karsten T, Kruyt PM, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Kelder JC, Tromp E, Boerma D. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:7. Published online. http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/13/1/7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations