Pathways to Water-Smart Power

  • David E. McNabbEmail author


This chapter looks at some of the steps underway for reducing the large amounts of water used by thermoelectric generating plants to produce most of the world’s electricity. Thermoelectric plants use coal, natural gas or nuclear power to generate power. These plants require large amounts of freshwater for producing steam in the boiler, for cooling and condensing the steam after it has been used to power turbines to generate electricity, and for scrubbing flue gas to remove and collect potential air pollutants.


Water–energy nexus Thermoelectric power Dry-cooling Discharge water heat pollution 


  1. Dilekli, Naci, Faye Duchin, and Ignacio Cazcarro. 2018. Restricting water withdrawals of the thermal power sector: An input-output analysis for the northeast of the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production 198: 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). 2014. Many newer power plants have cooling systems that reuse water. Accessed July 20 2018 from
  3. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). 2017. Hydroelectric generators are among the United States’ oldest power plants. Accessed July 25, 2018 from
  4. Gjorgiev, Blaže, and Giovanni Sansavini. 2017. Water-energy nexus: Impact on electrical energy conversion and mitigation by smart water resources management. Energy Conversion and Management 148: 1114–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grubert, Emily A., Fred C. Beach, and Michael E. Webber. 2012. Can switching fuels save water? A life cycle quantification of freshwater consumption for Texas coal- and natural gas-fired electricity. Environmental Research Letters 7 (4): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Khalkhali, Masoumeh, Kirk Westphal, and Weiwei Mo. 2018. The water-energy nexus at water supply and its implications on the integrated water and energy management. Science of the Total Environment 636: 1257–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liao, Xiawei, Jim W. Hall, and Nick Eyre. 2016. Water use in China’s thermoelectric power sector. Global Climate Change 41: 142–152.Google Scholar
  8. Liao, Xiawei, Xu Zhaob, Jim W. Hall, and Dabo Guan. 2018. Categorizing virtual water transfers through China’s electric power sector. Applied Energy 226: 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peer, Rebecca A.M., and Kelly T. Sanders. 2018. The water consequence of a transitioning US power sector. Applied Energy 210: 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reguckia, Pawel, Marek Lewkowicza, Renata Krzyżyńskab, and Hussam Jouharac. 2018. Numerical study of water flow rates in power plant cooling systems. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 7: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogers, John, Kristen Averyt, Steve Clemmer, Michelle Davis, Francisco Flores-Lopez, Peter Frumhoff, Doug Kenney, Jordan Macknick, Nadia Madden, James Meldrum, Jonothan Overpeck, Sandra Sattler, Erika Spanger-Siegfried, and David Yates. 2013. Water-smart power: Strengthening the U.S. electricity system in a warming world. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. Available at
  12. TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority). n.d. Caledonia combined cycle plant. Accessed July 24, 2018 from
  13. UN (United Nations). 2018. 2018 World Water Development Report. Accessed July 23, 2018 from
  14. Verbruggen, Aviel. 2018. Renewable and nuclear power: A common future? Energy Policy 36: 4036–4037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. WNA (World Nuclear Association). 2018. Nuclear power in the European Union. Accessed July 24, 2018 from
  16. Wu, X. D., and C.Q. Chen. 2017. Energy and water nexus in power generation: The surprisingly high amount of industrial water use induced by solar power infrastructure in China. Applied Energy 195: 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Lutheran UniversityTacomaUSA

Personalised recommendations