Advertisement

Introduction

  • Jacques Charmes
Chapter
Part of the Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development book series (DTSD, volume 10)

Abstract

Earnings of the poor populations have three major sources: informal activities, cash or in-kind transfers from other households and from the communities (that replace the lack of public social transfers) and unpaid care work (not taken into account by GDPs but accounting for the living standards). The political economy of development cannot be understood without taking into account the informal activities of the majority of the people, the role of social capital in societies where public social transfers are lacking and the hidden contribution of women to the household well-being through their unpaid care work. Recognising and assessing the role of these three forms of resilience is of major importance in order to understand how large and poor populations can make a living and survive under such conditions characterised by high unemployment and underemployment rates and more generally huge demographic challenges, as well as food insecurity, economic and social instability and uncertainty and globalised competition.

References

  1. Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Boulding, K. (1972). The household as Achilles’Heel. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 6(2), 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charmes, J. (1977). De l’ostentation à l’accumulation. Production et reproduction des rapports marchands dans les sociétés traditionnelles à partir de l’analyse du surplus, in Ouvrage collectif: “Essais sur la reproduction des formations sociales dominées”. Travaux et Documents de l’ORSTOM, n° 64, 192p., pp. 105–137.Google Scholar
  5. Charmes, J. (1978). Les blocages socio-culturels au développement en tant que manifestations de rapports de domination. Mondes en développement, 24, 877–908.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, C. (1958). The economics of housework. Quarterly Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 20, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dasgupta, P., & Serageldin, I. (Eds.). (1999). Social capital: A multifaceted capital. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, S. (1996). Adaptable livelihoods: Coping with food insecurity in the Malian Sahel. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devereux, S., & Sabates, W. R. (2004). Transformative social protection (IDS Working Paper 232). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  11. Folbre, N. (1991). The unproductive housewife: Her evolution in 19th century economics thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallin, D. (2011). Organizing informal workers: Historical overview. Presentation given at WIEGO Workshop Organising Informal Workers: Building and Strengthening Membership-Based Organisations, Bangkok, Thailand. Available at http://wiego.org/sites/wiego.org/files/reports/files/Organizing_informal_workers_historical_overview_Gallin.pdf
  13. Hart, K. (2015). How the informal economy took over the world, In P. Moertenboeck, H. Mooshammer, T. Cruz, & F. Forman (Eds.), Informal market worlds reader: The architecture of economic pressure (pp. 33–44). NAI010 Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hart, K. (2016). The real economy: the challenge of dialectical method. University of Pretoria. Paper presented to a conference “Real economy: Ethnographic inquiries into the reality and the realization of economic life”, Rio de Janeiro, June 16–18, 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Kuznets, S. (1941). National income and its composition, 1919–1938. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  16. Ledeneva, A. (Ed.). (2018). The global encyclopaedia of informality: Understanding social and cultural complexity (Vol. 1). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  17. Mauss, M. (1925). Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. Published in l’Année Sociologique, Quadrige/Presses universitaires de France, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Morgan, J. N., & Baerwaldt, N. A. (1971). Trends in inter-family transfers. Paper presented at a joint session of the Association for the Study of the Grants Economy and the American Economic Association, New Orleans, December 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Oduro, A. D. (2010). Formal and informal social protection in Sub-Saharan Africa. Paper prepared for the Workshop “Promoting resilience through social protection in Sub-Saharan Africa” organised by the European Report on Development in Dakar, 28–30 June 2010.Google Scholar
  20. Ouma, S. O. A. (1995). The role of social protection in the socioeconomic development of Uganda. Journal of Social Development in Africa, 10(2), 5–12.Google Scholar
  21. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Reid, M. (1934). Economics of household production. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Vuarin, R. (1993). Quelles solidarités sociales peut-on mobiliser pour faire face au coût de la maladie ? In J. Brunet-Jailly (Ed.), Se soigner au Mali. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
  24. Vuarin, R. (2000). Un système africain de protection sociale au temps de la mondialisation. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  25. Waring, M. (1988). Counting for nothing: What men value and what women are worth. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  26. World Bank. (2001). World development report 2000/01. Attacking poverty. Washington: World Bank, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques Charmes
    • 1
  1. 1.IRD University of Paris DescartesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations