Significance of Global Vectors Representation in Protein Sequences Analysis

  • Anon GeorgeEmail author
  • H. B. Barathi Ganesh
  • M. Anand Kumar
  • K. P. Soman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics book series (LNCVB, volume 31)


Understanding the meaning of protein sequences is tedious with human efforts alone. Through this work, we experiment an NLP technique to extract features and give appropriate representation for the protein sequences. In this paper, we have used GloVe representation for the same. A dataset named Swiss-Prot has been incorporated into this work. We were able to create a representation that has comparable ability to understand the semantics of protein sequences compared to the existing ones. We have analyzed the performance of representation by the classification of different protein families in the Swiss-Prot dataset using machine learning technique. The analysis done by us proved the significance of this representation.


  1. 1.
    Ando D, Colvin M, Rexach M, Gopinathan A (2013) Physical motif clustering within intrinsically disordered nucleoporin sequences reveals universal functional features. PloS One 8(9):e73,831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asgari E, Mofrad MR (2015) Continuous distributed representation of biological sequences for deep proteomics and genomics. PloS One 10(11):e0141,287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balakrishnan BGH, Vinayakumar AKM, Padannayil SK. Nlp cen amrita@ smm4h: health care text classification through class embeddingsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barathi Ganesh H, Anand Kumar M, Soman K (2016) Distributional semantic representation in health care text classification. CEUR 1737Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bork P, Dandekar T, Diaz-Lazcoz Y, Eisenhaber F, Huynen M, Yuan Y (1998) Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back1. J Mol Biol 283(4):707–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cai C, Han L, Ji ZL, Chen X, Chen YZ (2003) Svm-prot: web-based support vector machine software for functional classification of a protein from its primary sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3692–3697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ganesh HB, Kumar MA, Soman K (2016) From vector space models to vector space models of semantics. In: Forum for information retrieval evaluation. Springer, Berlin, pp 50–60Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    George A, Soman K et al (2018) Teamcen at semeval-2018 task 1: global vectors representation in emotion detection. In: Proceedings of the 12th international workshop on semantic evaluation, pp 334–338Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huynen M, Snel B, Lathe W, Bork P (2000) Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. Genome Res 10(8):1204–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lasko TA, Denny JC, Levy MA (2013) Computational phenotype discovery using unsupervised feature learning over noisy, sparse, and irregular clinical data. PloS One 8(6):e66,341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3111–3119Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motomura K, Fujita T, Tsutsumi M, Kikuzato S, Nakamura M, Otaki JM (2012) Word decoding of protein amino acid sequences with availability analysis: a linguistic approach. PloS One 7(11):e50,039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247(4):536–540Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C (2014) Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), pp 1532–1543Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Searls DB (2002) The language of genes. Nature 420(6912):211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suykens JA, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anon George
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. B. Barathi Ganesh
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Anand Kumar
    • 1
  • K. P. Soman
    • 1
  1. 1.Amrita School of Engineering, Center for Computational Engineering and Networking (CEN), Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Arnekt Solution Pvt. Ltd.PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations