Advertisement

Imagining Postcolonial-Development Studies: Reflections on Positionalities and Research Practices

  • Julia Schöneberg
Chapter
Part of the EADI Global Development Series book series (EADI)

Abstract

We find ourselves at a social, political, economic and environmental crossroads, where Development Studies in all its facets have been designated a leading role. Postcolonial Studies and postcolonial perspectives have often been neglected in Development Studies debates. Usually the fields are considered as being far apart: the former being concerned with discourse and representation, the latter focusing on the applicability of concepts and practices. However, linking both fields of thought may provide valuable insights for Development Studies to better cope with the global challenges of the twenty-first century. To illustrate possible openings the chapter discusses analytical tools of Postcolonial Studies in the context of development. It asks whether Postcolonial-Development Studies are imaginable and how Development Studies and research can benefit from postcolonial strategies.

References

  1. Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion [110 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 30. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302.
  2. Bernstein, H. (2001). Colonialism, Capitalism, Development. In T. Allen & A. Thomas (Eds.), Poverty and Development into the 21st Century (pp. 241–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beverly, J. (1999). Subalternity and Representation: Arguments in Cultural Theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhabha, H. (1994). Signs Taken for Wonders. Questions of Ambivalence and Authority Under a Tree Outside Delhi, May 1817. In H. Bhabha (Ed.), The Location of Culture (pp. 145–174). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bhambra, G. K. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cowen, M. P., & Shenton, R. W. (1996). Doctrines of Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. and Trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  11. Goulet, D. (1980). Development Experts: The One-Eyed Giants. World Development, 8(7–8), 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, S. (1992). The West and the Rest. Discourse and Power. In B. Gieben & S. Hall (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 276–320). London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kothari, U. (2005). From Colonial Administration to Development Studies: A Post-colonial Critique of the History of Development Studies. In U. Kothari (Ed.), A Radical History of Development Studies: Individuals, Institutions and Ideologies (pp. 47–66). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  15. Loomba, A. (2008). Colonialism/Post colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Mato, D. (2000). Not “Studying the Subaltern,” but Studying with “Subaltern” Social Groups, or, at Least, Studying the Hegemonic Articulations of Power. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1(3), 479–503.Google Scholar
  17. Matthews, S. (2018, January 10). Confronting the Colonial Library: Teaching Political Studies Amidst Calls for a Decolonised Curriculum. Politikon. South African Journal of Political Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2018.1418204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McClintock, A. (1992). The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-colonialism”. Social Text (31–32), 84–98.  https://doi.org/10.2307/466219.
  19. McDonnell, J. (2003). Challenging the Euro-Western Epistemological Dominance of Development Through an African Cosmovision. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  20. McEwan, C. (2008). Subaltern. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 59–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. McEwan, C. (2009). Postcolonialism and Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Meckesheimer, A. (2013). Decolonization of Social Research Practice in Latin America. What Can We Learn for German Social Sciences? Transcience, 4(2), 79–98.Google Scholar
  23. Melber, H. (2015). Knowledge Is Power—And Power Affects Knowledge: Challenges for Research Collaboration in and with Africa. Africa Development, 40(4), 21–42.Google Scholar
  24. Mignolo, W. D. (2005). Prophets Facing Sidewise: The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference. Social Epistemology, 19(1), 111–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720500084325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nandi, M. (2012). Sprachgewalt, Unterdrückung und die Verwundbarkeit der postkolonialen Intellektuellen: Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: “Can the Subaltern Speak” und “Critique of Postcolonial Reason”. In J. Reuter & A. Karentzos (Eds.), Schlüsselwerke der Postcolonial Studies (pp. 121–130). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raghuram, P., & Madge, C. (2006). Towards a Method for Postcolonial Development Geography? Possibilities and Challenges. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 27, 270–288.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rostow, W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sachs, W. (Ed.). (2005). The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Eleventh Impression. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  29. Said, E. (1994/1978). From Orientalism. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader (pp. 132–149). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sardar, Z. (1999). Development and the Locations of Eurocentrism. In R. Munck & D. O’Hearn (Eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm (pp. 44–62), London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  31. Scheper-Hughes, N. (1995). The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 409–440.  https://doi.org/10.1086/204378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheppard, E. (2002). The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality. Economic Geography, 78(3), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies. Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Spivak, G. C. (1994/1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial Discourse and Post-colonial Theory: A Reader (pp. 66–111). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  35. Sylvester, C. (1999). Development Studies and Postcolonial Studies: Disparate Tales of the “Third World”. Third World Quarterly, 20(4), 703–721.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, A. (2001). Meanings and Views of Development. In T. Allen & A. Thomas (Eds.), Poverty and Development into the 21st Century (pp. 23–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tucker, V. (1999). The Myth of Development: A Critique of a Eurocentric Discourse. In R. Munck & D. O’Hearn (Eds.), Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  38. Willis, K. (2005). Theories and Practices of Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Young, R. J. C. (2003). Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziai, A. (2012). Postcolonial Perspectives on ‘Development’ (Working Paper No. 103). Center for Development Research. University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  41. Ziai, A. (2016a). Postkoloniale Studien und Politikwissenschaft. Komplementäre Defizite und ein Forschungsprogramm. In A. Ziai (Ed.), Postkoloniale Politikwissenschaft. Theoretische und empirische Zugänge. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ziai, A. (2016b). Development Discourse and Global History: From Colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Schöneberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for Development and Postcolonial StudiesUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations