Advertisement

Knowledge Production, Ownership and the Power of Definition: Perspectives on and from Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Henning Melber
Chapter
Part of the EADI Global Development Series book series (EADI)

Abstract

The chapter engages with challenges facing genuine research collaboration and knowledge production in a North–South interaction with particular reference to Development Studies. It maps asymmetries in scholarly interaction generally and examines African realities specifically. Partnership limitations are critically explored by identifying some structural legacies resulting from centuries of Northern hegemony established in all spheres related to global affairs and interactions. It presents some thoughts on how these limitations might be reduced or eliminated in favour of a truly joint effort to work towards equal relations and mutual respect—also as an integral part of EADI’s agenda for Development Studies to contribute towards global partnerships. Special attention is given to the variety of views from within the African continent and African scholars elsewhere engaged in related debates.

References

  1. Aghajanian, A., & Allouche, J. (2016). Introduction: Development Studies—Past, Present and Future. IDS Bulletin, 47(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Baaz, M. E. (2005). The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bliesemann de Guevara, B., & Kostic, R. (2017). Knowledge Production in/About Conflict and Intervention: Finding ‘Facts’, Telling ‘Truth’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2017.1287635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bothwell, E. (2016, May 7). African Universities Must Be ‘Audacious’ to Transform Continent. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/african-universities-must-be-audacious-to-transform-continent. Accessed 4 June 2017.
  5. Briggs, R. C., & Weathers, S. (2016). Gender and Location in African Politics Scholarship: The Other White Man’s Burden? African Affairs, 115(460), 466–489.  https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adw009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadbent, A. (2017a, May 17). African Universities Must Take a Critical View of Knowledge and How It’s Made. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/african-universities-must-take-a-critical-view-of-knowledge-and-how-its-made-77878. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  7. Broadbent, A. (2017b, June 1). It Will Take Critical, Thorough Scrutiny to Truly Decolonize Knowledge. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/it-will-take-critical-thorough-scrutiny-to-truly-decolonise-knowledge-78477. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  8. Callods, F. (2016). Knowledge Divides: Social Science Production on Inequalities and Social Justice. In World Social Sciences Report 2016 (pp. 280–285). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and International Social Science Council (ISSC).Google Scholar
  9. Carbonnier, G., & Kontinen, T. (2014). North-South Research Partnerships: Academia Meets Development? (Policy Paper Series). Bonn: European Association for Development Research and Training Institutes EADI.Google Scholar
  10. Carbonnier, G., & Kontinen, T. (2015). Institutional Learning in North-South Research Partnerships. Revue Tiers Monde, 221, 149–162.  https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.221.0149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Centre for African Studies. (n.d., 1998). Teaching Africa: The Curriculum Debate at UCT. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  12. Cheeseman, N., Death, C., & Whitfield, L. (2017). Notes on Researching Africa. African Affairs, Virtual issue on Research Notes, available online only, 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adx005.
  13. Collier, P. (1993). Africa and the Study of Economics. In R. H. Bates, V. Y. Mudimbe, & J. F. O’Barr (Eds.), Africa and the Disciplines—The Contributions of Research in Africa to the Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 58–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the South or, How Euro-America Is Evolving Toward Africa. London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  15. Dabashi, H. (2009). The Discrete Charm of European Intellectuals. International Journal of Zizek Studies, 3(4). http://zizekstudies.org/index.php/ijzs/article/view/220/314. Accessed 23 February 2016.
  16. Dabashi, H. (2013, January 15). Can Non-Europeans Think? What Happens to Thinkers Who Operate Outside the European Philosophical ‘Pedigree’? AlJazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/2013114142638797542.html. Accessed 11 February 2015.
  17. Dabashi, H. (2015). Can Non-Europeans Think? London: Zed.Google Scholar
  18. Davies, S. (2016). Introduction: Information, Knowledge and Power. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 132–150 (Originally published in 1994, 25(2)).Google Scholar
  19. Duffield, M., & Hewitt, M. V. (Eds.). (2009). Empire, Development & Colonialism. The Past in the Present. Woodbridge: James Currey.Google Scholar
  20. Gordon, L. R. (2014). Disciplinary Decadence and the Decolonisation of Knowledge. Africa Development, 39(1), 81–92.Google Scholar
  21. Goodhand, J. (2007). The Paternalism of Partnership: A Postcolonial Reading of Identity in Development Aid by Maria Eriksson Baaz. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(3), 418–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halvorsen, T. (2017). International Co-operation and the Democratization of Knowledge. In T. Halvorsen & J. Nossum (Eds.), North-South Knowledge Networks: Towards Equitable Collaboration Between Academics, Donors and Universities (pp. 277–309). Cape Town and Bergen: African Minds and UIB Global.Google Scholar
  23. Hodge, J. M., Hödl, G., & Kopf, M. (Eds.). (2014). Developing Africa: Concepts and Practices in Twentieth-Century Colonialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Horáková, H. (2016). Knowledge Production in and on Africa: Knowledge Gatekeepers, Decolonization, Alternative Representations. In H. Horáková & K. Werkman (Eds.), Knowledge Production in and on Africa (pp. 21–52). Wien: LIT.Google Scholar
  25. Hountondji, P. J. (1983). African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hountondji, P. J. (1990). Scientific Dependence in Africa Today. Research in African Literature, 21(3), 5–15.Google Scholar
  27. Ishengoma, J. M. (2016). North-South Research Collaborations and Their Impact on Capacity Building: A Southern Perspective. In T. Halvorsen & J. Nossum (Eds.), North-South Knowledge Networks: Towards Equitable Collaboration Between Academics, Donors and Universities (pp. 149–186). Cape Town and Bergen: African Minds and UIB Global.Google Scholar
  28. Israel, J. I. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Israel, J. I. (2006). Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Israel, J. I. (2011). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jolly, R., & Santos, R. (2016). From Development of the ‘Other’ to Global Governance for Universal and Sustainable Development. IDS Bulletin, 47(2), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krenceyová, M. (2014). Who Is Allowed to Speak About Africa? A Reflection on Knowledge, Positionality, and Authority in Africanist Scholarship. Africa Insight, 44(1), 8–22.Google Scholar
  33. Keim, W. (2008). Social Sciences Internationally—The Problem of Marginalisation and Its Consequences for the Discipline of Sociology. African Sociological Review, 12(2), 22–48.Google Scholar
  34. Keim, W., Celic, E., Ersche, C., & Wöhrer, V. (Eds.). (2014). Global Knowledge Production in the Social Science: Made in Circulation. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Lagos, F. (2015). Review: Global Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences: Made in Circulation. Theory, Culture & Society. https://www.theoryculturesociety.org/review-global-knowledge-production-in-the-social-sciences-made-in-circulation/. Accessed 24 May 2017.
  36. Levenson, Z. (2017, July 13). South Africa’s Very Own David Brooks. http://africasacountry.com/2017/07/south-africas-very-own-david-brooks/. Accessed 14 July 2017.
  37. Macamo, E. (2016). ‘Before We Start’: Science and Power in the Constitution of Africa. In M. Ramutsindela, G. Miescher, & M. Boehi (Eds.), The Politics of Nature and Science in Southern Africa (pp. 323–334). Basel: Basler Afrika Bibliographien.Google Scholar
  38. Mama, A. (2007). Is It Ethical to Study Africa? Preliminary Thoughts on Scholarship and Freedom. African Studies Review, 50(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.2005.0122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Melber, H. (2014). What Is African in Africa(n) Studies? Confronting the (Mystifying) Power of Ideology and Identity. Africa Bibliography, 2013, vii–xvii.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266673114000038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Melber, H. (2015). Knowledge Is Power—And Power Affects Knowledge: Challenges for Research Collaboration in and with Africa. Africa Development, 40(4), 21–42.Google Scholar
  41. Melber, H. (2016). African Studies: The Ambiguity of Ownership and Originality. Africa, 86(2), 347–349.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972016000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Melber, H. (2017). Development Studies and the SDGs—Mapping an Agenda (Policy Paper Series). Bonn: European Association for Development Training and Research Institutes EADI. https://www.eadi.org/typo3/fileadmin/Documents/Publications/EADI_Policy_Paper/EADI_policy_paper_Melber_August_2017.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2018.
  43. Mishra, P. (2014, October 14). The Western Model Is Broken. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/14/-sp-western-model-broken-pankaj-mishra). Accessed 16 February 2015.
  44. Mishra, P. (2015, January 20). After the Paris Attacks: It’s Time for a New Enlightenment. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/jan/20/-sp-after-paris-its-time-for-new-enlightenment. Accessed 16 February 2015.
  45. Mkandawire, T. (2002). African Intellectuals, Political Culture and Development. Austrian Journal of Development Studies, 18(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
  46. Mkandawire, T. (2011). Running While Others Walk: Knowledge and the Challenge of Africa’s Development. Africa Development, 36(2), 1–36.Google Scholar
  47. Mönks, J., Carbonnier, G., Mellet, A., & De Haan, L. (2017). Towards a Renewed Vision of Development Studies. International Development Policy/Revue International De Politique De Développement, 8(1). https://poldev.revues.org/2393. Accessed 24 August 2017.
  48. Ndhlovu, F. (2017). Southern Development Discourse for Southern Africa: Linguistic and Cultural Imperatives. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12(2), 89–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2016.1277733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Obrecht, A. J. (2014). Wozu Wissen Wollen? Wissen—Herrschaft—Welterfahrung: Ein Beitrag zur Wissensdiskussion aus kultur- und wissenssoziologischer Perspektive. Wien: Edition Ausblick.Google Scholar
  50. Ogachi, I. O. (2011). Neo-Liberalism and the Subversion of Academic Freedom from Within: Money, Corporate Cultures and ‘Captured’ Intellectuals in African Public Universities. Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 9(1&2), 25–47.Google Scholar
  51. Olukoshi, A. (2007). African Scholars and African Studies. In H. Melber (Ed.), On Africa: Scholars and African Studies: Contributions in Honour of Lennart Wohlgemuth (pp. 7–22). Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
  52. QS. (2016). World University Rankings by Subject 2016—Development Studies. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2016/development-studies. Accessed 4 June 2017.
  53. Robbe, K. (2014). African Studies at a Crossroads: Producing Theory Across the Disciplines in South Africa. Social Dynamics, 40(2), 255–273.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2014.932175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sall, E. (2002). The Social Sciences in Africa. Austrian Journal of Development Studies, 18(1), 49–67.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  56. Standing, H., & Taylor, P. (2016). Whose Knowledge Counts? Development Studies Institutions and Power Relations in a Globalised World. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 169–178 (Originally published in 2007, 38(2)).Google Scholar
  57. Teferra, D. (2016, July 24). Ranking African Universities: Hypocrisy, Impunity and Complicity. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/ranking-african-universities-hypocrisy-impunity-and-complicity-62709. Accessed 4 June 2017.
  58. The Guardian. (2017, March 8). QS World University Rankings 2017: Development Studies. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/mar/08/qs-world-university-rankings-2017-development-studies. Accessed 4 June 2017.
  59. UNESCO/ISSC. (2010). World Social Science Report 2010: Knowledge Divides. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and International Social Science Council (ISSC).Google Scholar
  60. Weingart, P. (2006). Knowledge and inequality. In G. Therborn (Ed.), Inequalities of the World: New Theoretical Frameworks, Multiple Empirical Approaches (pp. 163–190). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, C. (2001). Review of Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples by Linda Tuhiwai Smith. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 17, 214–217.Google Scholar
  62. Zeleza, P. T., & Olukoshi, A. (Eds.). (2004). African Universities in the Twenty-First Century: Volume II: Knowledge and Society. Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
  63. Ziai, A. (2012). Postcolonial Perspectives on ‘Development’ (ZEF Working Paper 103). Bonn: Centre for Development Research, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  64. Ziai, A. (2016). Development Discourse and Global History. From Colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henning Melber
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Africa StudiesUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  3. 3.Institute for Commonwealth Studies/Centre for Advanced StudyUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations