The Coalition’s ‘Two Nations’ Hegemonic Project

  • Scott LaveryEmail author
Part of the Building a Sustainable Political Economy: SPERI Research & Policy book series (SPERIRP)


Whilst the Coalition re-established Britain’s pre-crisis growth model, it effectively broke with the ‘One Nation’ hegemonic project which New Labour had pursued in office. In its place, the Coalition advanced a distinctive ‘two nations’ strategy which sought to build a limited but durable base of support. This chapter traces how this strategy underpinned the Coalition’s far-reaching programme of welfare restructuring and public sector retrenchment. The Coalition’s ‘two nations’ hegemonic project enjoyed a limited degree of success in the 2010–2015. But it also eroded some of the key mechanisms which had stabilised British capitalism in the pre-crisis conjuncture and laid the conditions for a backlash in the subsequent period.


  1. Atkins, J. (2015). “Together in the National Interest”: The Rhetoric of Unity and the Formation of the Cameron—Clegg Government. The Political Quarterly, 86(1), 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach, S., & Stroleny, A. (2013). Public Service Employment Restructuring in the Crisis in the UK and Ireland: Social Partnership in Retreat. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(4), 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bank of England. (2012). The Distributional Effects of Asset Purchases. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2012 Q3. London.Google Scholar
  4. Baumberg, B. (2012). Benefit Cuts, Welfare Reform and Inequality. The Coalition Government and Income Inequality: Half-Term Report. London.Google Scholar
  5. BBC News. (2010). NI’s 100 Days Under the Coalition—BBC News. BBC News Website. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from
  6. Beech, M. (2011). A Tale of Two Liberalisms. In M. Beech & S. Lee (Eds.), The Cameron-Clegg Government: Coalition Politics in an Age of Austerity (pp. 267–279). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boffey, D. (2011). Public Sector Workers Need “Discipline and Fear.” The Guardian. London.Google Scholar
  8. Bozio, A., & Disney, R. (2011). Public Sector Pay and Pensions. IFS Green Budget. Retrieved December 13, 2015, from
  9. Brewer, M., Dickerson, A., Gambin, L., Green, A., Joyce, R., & Wilson, R. (2012). The Impact of Employment Changes on Poverty in 2020. JRF—Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from
  10. Bulpitt, J. (1986). The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher’s Domestic Statecraft. Political Studies, 34(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham, P. (2011). Towards a Political Theory of Crisis: Policy and Resistance Across Europe. New Political Science, 33(4), 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton, M. (2013). The Politics of Public Sector Reform: From Thatcher to the Coalition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cameron, D. (2010). Conference Speech 2010: Together in the National Interest. BBC News Website. Retrieved December 6, 2015, from
  14. Cameron, D. (2012). David Cameron’s Welfare Speech. The Telegraph. London.Google Scholar
  15. Cameron, D. (2013). PMQs 6 November 2013. House of Commons Hansard Debates for 6 November 2013. Retrieved December 9, 2015, from
  16. Cheesman, H. (2014). Cameron’s Tories: Talking Conservative, Acting Radical. Revue LISA/LISA E-Journal, 7(8).Google Scholar
  17. Cribb, J., Disney, R., & Sibieta, L. (2014). The Public Sector Workforce: Past, Present and Future (IFS Briefing Note BN145). London.Google Scholar
  18. Cribb, J., Emmerson, C., & Sibieta, L. (2014). Public Sector Pay in the UK. London.Google Scholar
  19. Crines, A. S. (2013). The Rhetoric of the Coalition: Governing in the National Interest? Representation, 49(2), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Darlington, R., & Dobson, J. (2015). The Conservative Government’s Proposed Strike Ballot Thresholds: The Challenge to the Trade Unions. Salford.Google Scholar
  21. Dorey, P. (2015). A Farewell to Alms: Thatcherism’s Legacy of Inequality. British Politics, 10(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dorey, P., & Garnett, M. (2012). No Such Thing as the “Big Society”? The Conservative Party’s Unnecessary Search for “Narrative” in the 2010 General Election. British Politics, 7(4), 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan Smith, I. (2013). Speech to Capita Welfare Reform Conference. Capital Welfare Reform Conference. Retrieved December 13, 2015, from
  24. DWP. (2010). 21st Century Welfare. London.Google Scholar
  25. DWP. (2012). Benefit Cap (Housing Benefit) Regulations 2012: Impact Assessment for the Benefit Cap. London.Google Scholar
  26. Easton, M. (2011). Fair’s Fair. BBC News Website. Retrieved December 8, 2015, from
  27. Eaton, G. (2010). Cameron Prepares to Go to War with the Trade Unions. The New Statesman. Retrieved December 14, 2015, from
  28. Evans, S. (1997). Thatcher and the Victorians: A Suitable Case for Comparison? History, 82(268), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Evans, S. (2010). “Mother”s Boy’: David Cameron and Margaret Thatcher. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 12(3), 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Exell, R. (2010). The Spending Review and Public Sector Jobs. Radical Statistics, 103, 25–34.Google Scholar
  31. Exell, R. (2013). Inequality, Social Security and the Recession. TUC Touchstone Blog. Retrieved December 8, 2015, from
  32. Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2012). Budgeting and Governing for Deficit Reduction in the UK Public Sector: Act 2 “The Annual Budget”. Public Money & Management, 32(2), 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gamble, A. (2011). Project Cameron. Public Policy Research, 18(3), 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gamble, A. (2012). Economic Policy. In T. Heppell & D. Seawright (Eds.), Cameron and the Conservatives: The Transition to Coalition Government (pp. 59–73). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ganesh, J. (2012). George Osborne: The Austerity Chancellor. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Garthwaite, K. (2011). “The Language of Shirkers and Scroungers?” Talking About Illness, Disability and Coalition Welfare Reform. Disability & Society, 26(3), 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goulden, C. (2014). Budget 2014: Welfare Cap Protects Wealthier Claimants, Not Those in Greatest Need. Joseph Rowntree Foundation Blog. Retrieved December 10, 2015, from
  38. Green, J., & Lavery, S. (2015). The Regressive Recovery: Distribution, Inequality and State Power in Britain’s Post-crisis Political Economy. New Political Economy, 20(6), 894–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Griffiths, S. (2015). Statecraft as a Straightjacket: A Reply to Gamble and Hayton. Parliamentary Affairs, 68(4), 735–743.Google Scholar
  40. Grimshaw, D. (2013). Austerity, Privatization and Levelling Down. In D. Vaughan-Whitehead (Ed.), Public Sector Shock (pp. 576–626). Geneva: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grimshaw, D., & Rubery, J. (2015). Neoliberalism 2.0: Crisis and Austerity in the UK. In S. Lehndorff (Ed.), Divisive Integration: The Triumph of Failed Ideas in Europe. Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, S. (1979, January). The Great Moving Right Show. Marxism Today, 14–20.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, S. (2011). The Neo-Liberal Revolution. Cultural Studies, 25(6), 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hall, S., & Jaques, M. (1983). The Politics of Thatcherism. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  45. Hamnett, C. (2014). Shrinking the Welfare State: The Structure, Geography and Impact of British Government Benefit Cuts. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(4), 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hay, C. (1996a). Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Discontent’. Sociology, 30(2), 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hay, C. (1996b). Re-stating Social and Political Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hay, C. (1997). State of the Art: Divided by a Common Language: Political Theory and the Concept of Power. Politics, 17(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(3), 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hayton, R. (2013). Conservative Party Statecraft and the Politics of Coalition. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(1), 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hern, A. (2012). George Osborne Doesn’t Like it if Your Blinds are Down in the Morning. New Statesman. Retrieved November 12, 2018, from
  52. Hickson, K. (2009). Conservatism and the Poor: Conservative Party Attitudes to Poverty and Inequality Since the 1970s. British Politics, 4(3), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. HM Government. (2012). Welfare Reform Act 2012.Google Scholar
  54. HM Treasury. (2010). Spending Review 2010. London.Google Scholar
  55. Hood, A., & Phillips, D. (2015). Benefit Spending and Reforms: The Coalition Government’s Record. London.Google Scholar
  56. Hope, C., & Winnett, R. (2012, January 9). Downing Street: Broadest Shoulders Must Carry Tax Burden. The Telegraph.Google Scholar
  57. IFS. (2010). New IFS Research Challenges Chancellor’s “Progressive Budget” Claim. London.Google Scholar
  58. IFS. (2014a). A Survey of the GB Benefit System. IFS Election Briefing.Google Scholar
  59. IFS. (2014b). What Is Welfare Spending? Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). London.Google Scholar
  60. Jessop, B. (1983). Accumulation Strategies, State Forms, and Hegemonic Projects. Kapitalstat, 10, 89–111.Google Scholar
  61. Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  62. Jessop, B., Bonnett, K., Bromley, S., & Ling, T. (1988). Thatcherism: A Tale of Two Nations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  63. Keegan, W. (2014). Mr Osborne’s Economic Experiment. London: Searching Finance Limited.Google Scholar
  64. Kerr, P., Byrne, C., & Foster, E. (2011). Theorising Cameronism. Political Studies Review, 9(2), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lakin, M. (2013). The Ideology of the Coalition: More “Muscular” Than “Liberal”? British Politics, 8(4), 476–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee, S. (2011a). No Plan B: The Coalition Agenda for Cutting the Deficit and Rebalancing the Economy. In S. Lee & M. Beech (Eds.), The Cameron-Clegg Government: Coalition Politics in an Age of Austerity (pp. 3–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lee, S. (2011b). “We Are All in This Together”: The Coalition Agenda for British Modernization. In S. Lee & M. Beech (Eds.), The Cameron-Clegg Government: Coalition Politics in an Age of Austerity (pp. 3–23). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lupton, R., Burchardt, T., Fitzgerald, A., Hills, J., McKnight, A., Obolenskaya, P., & Vizard, P. (2015). The Coalition’s Social Policy Record. Social Policy in a Cold Climate. London.Google Scholar
  69. Machin, S. (1997). The Decline of Labour Market Institutions and the Rise in Wage Inequality in Britain. European Economic Review, 41(3–5), 647–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1995). Evaluating Thatcherism: Over the Moon or as Sick as a Parrot? Politics, 15(1), 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mason, R. (2013, January 8). Will the Benefit Squeeze Hit the “Strivers” or the “Skivers with Their Blinds Down”? The Telegraph.Google Scholar
  72. Massie, A. (2015, April). Why Aren’t the Tories Winning? Because They Are Seen as the Party of the Rich. The Spectator.Google Scholar
  73. McAnulla, S. (2010). Heirs to Blair’s Third Way? David Cameron’s Triangulating Conservatism. British Politics, 5(3), 286–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. OBR. (2012). Economic and Fiscal Outlook—. London.Google Scholar
  75. OBR. (2013). Economic and Fiscal Outlook 2013. London.Google Scholar
  76. OBR. (2014). Economic and Fiscal Outlook—December 2014. London.Google Scholar
  77. Osborne, G. (2010). Comprehensive Spending Review 2010. House of Commons Hansard Debates for 20 Oct 2010. Retrieved December 6, 2015, from
  78. Osborne, G. (2011). Autumn Statement 2011: George Osborne’s Speech. The Telegraph. Retrieved November 3, 2015, from
  79. Parry, R. (2011, July 4–6). The Public Sector Workforce in Recession 2010–11—The Course of Policy Development in the Euro Area and the UK. Paper for the Annual Conference of the Social Policy Association (pp. 1–16). Lincoln.Google Scholar
  80. Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pierson, P. (1996). The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Policy Exchange. (2013). What’s Wrong with the Tory Party? Retrieved December 7, 2015, from
  83. SPERI. (2015). Inequality Redux. Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI) Paper, 22. Sheffield.Google Scholar
  84. Stanley, L. (2016). Legitimacy Gaps, Taxpayer Conflict, and the Politics of Austerity in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(2), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taylor-Gooby, P., & Stoker, G. (2011). The Coalition Programme: A New Vision for Britain or Politics as Usual? The Political Quarterly, 82(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Toynbee, P., & Walker, D. (2015). Cameron’s Coup: Anatomy of a Revolution. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  87. TUC. (2013a). Support for Benefit Cuts Dependent on Ignorance, TUC-Commissioned Poll Finds. Trade Union Congress (TUC). Retrieved December 13, 2015, from
  88. TUC. (2013b). The UK’s Low Pay Recovery. Trade Union Congress (TUC). Retrieved November 2, 2015, from
  89. TUC. (2014). Public Sector Workers Lose Out on £2,245 Under This Government, Says TUC. TUC Press Release. Retrieved December 14, 2015, from
  90. Valentine, G., & Harris, C. (2014). Strivers vs Skivers: Class Prejudice and the Demonisation of Dependency in Everyday Life. Geoforum, 53, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wood, S. (2013). Explaining One Nation Labour. The Political Quarterly, 84(3), 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. YouGov. (2013a). Conservative for Economy, Labour for Living Standards? YouGov. Retrieved December 13, 2015, from
  93. YouGov. (2013b). YouGov/Sunday Times Survey Results. London.Google Scholar
  94. YouGov. (2014). General Election 2015: How Britain Really Voted. YouGov Website. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI)University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations