Advertisement

Social Viewing in Cinematic Virtual Reality: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Sylvia RotheEmail author
  • Mario Montagud
  • Christian Mai
  • Daniel Buschek
  • Heinrich Hußmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)

Abstract

Cinematic Virtual Reality (CVR) has been increasing in popularity in the last years. However, viewers can feel isolated when watching 360° movies with a Head-Mounted Display. Since watching movies is a social experience for most people, we investigate if the use of Head Mounted Displays is appropriate for enabling shared CVR experiences. In this context, even if viewers are watching the movie simultaneously, they do not automatically see the same field of view, since they can freely choose the viewing direction. Based on the literature and experiences from past user studies, we identify seven challenges. To address these challenges, we present and discuss design ideas for a CVR social movie player and highlight directions for future work.

Keywords

Cinematic Virtual Reality 360° video Social viewing 

References

  1. 1.
    Nguyen, C., DiVerdi, S., Hertzmann, A., Liu, F.: CollaVR: Collaborative In-Headset Review for VR Video. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST 2017, pp. 267–277. ACM Press, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, Y.-T., Liao, Y.-C., Teng, S.-Y., et al.: Outside-in. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST 2017, pp. 255–265. ACM Press, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geerts, D., Vaishnavi, I., Mekuria, R., et al.: Are we in sync?: synchronization requirements for watching online video together. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 311–314 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montagud, M., Boronat, F., Stokking, H., van Brandenburg, R.: Inter-destination multimedia synchronization: schemes, use cases and standardization. Multimed. Syst. 18, 459–482 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-012-0278-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boronat, F., Montagud, M., Marfil, D., Luzon, C.: Hybrid broadcast/broadband TV services and media synchronization: demands, preferences and expectations of Spanish consumers. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 64, 52–69 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2017.2737819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Hagan, R.G., Zelinsky, A., Rougeaux, S.: Visual gesture interfaces for virtual environments. Interact. Comput. 14, 231–250 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(01)00050-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pakkanen, T., Hakulinen, J., Jokela, T., et al.: Interaction with WebVR 360° video player: comparing three interaction paradigms. In: 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 279–280. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gugenheimer, J., Stemasov, E., Frommel, J., Rukzio, E.: ShareVR: enabling co-located experiences for virtual reality between HMD and non-HMD users. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2017, pp. 4021–4033. ACM Press, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Núñez, A., Montagud, M., Fraile, I., Gómez, D., Fernández, S.: ImmersiaTV: an end-to-end toolset to enable customizable and immersive multi-screen TV experiences. In: Workshop on Virtual Reality, co-located with ACM TVX, Seoul, South Korea (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia Rothe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mario Montagud
    • 2
  • Christian Mai
    • 1
  • Daniel Buschek
    • 1
  • Heinrich Hußmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Ludwig Maximilian University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.University of Valencia & i2CAT FoundationValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations