Advertisement

A Model for Describing Alternate Reality Games

  • Ryan JavanshirEmail author
  • Beth Carroll
  • David E. Millard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)

Abstract

Alternate Reality Games (ARGs) are a form of transmedia storytelling that are difficult to describe and analyse due to their inherent ephemerality and use of multiple media channels. But critical analyses of ARGs and a deeper understanding of how they work are needed for both improvements in ARG design theory, and to aid in the preservation of ARG content and structure. This paper presents a way to describe and analyse ARGs, the ARG Descriptive Model (ADM), that combines together features from several existing approaches to create a more holistic description of an ARG. The ADM is then applied to two case studies to demonstrate how it can be used to model the media channels, potential navigation routes between these channels, and how these channels evolve over time. The paper shows that this approach can be applied to create a basis for a common methodology for ARG analyses.

Keywords

Alternate Reality Games Narrative Transmedia storytelling 

References

  1. 1.
    Aaseth, E.: Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bal, M.: Narratology: An Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, 3rd edn. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonsignore, E., Moulder, V., Neustaedter, C., Hansen, D., Kraus, K., Druin, A.: Design tactics for authentic interactive fiction: insights from Alternate Reality Game designers. In: Proceedings of 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2014, pp. 947–950 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciancia, M.: Transmedia design framework. Design-oriented approach to transmedia research. Int. J. Transmedia Lit. 1(1), 131–145 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Beer, K.: Alternate Reality Games (ARG) as innovative digital information sources. Libr. Hi Tech 34(3), 433–453 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Dena, C.: Emerging participatory culture practices: player-created tiers in Alternate Reality Games. Convergence 14(1), 41–57 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia, A., Niemeyer, G.: Alternate Reality Games and the Cusp of Digital Gameplay. Bloomsbury, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hansen, D., Bonsignore, E., Ruppel, M., Visconti, A., Kraus, K.: Designing reusable alternate reality games. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2013, p. 1529 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jenkins, H.: Convergence Culture. New York University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, J., Allen, J., Lee, E.: Alternate Reality Games. Educ. Week Digit. Dir. 51(2), 36–42 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips, A., Thompson, B., Alexander, B., Dena, C., Barlow N.: 2006 Alternate Reality Games White Paper. IGDA ARG SIG (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pratten, R.: Getting started with transmedia storytelling. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prince, G.: A Grammar of Stories: An Introduction. Mouton, The Hague (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruppel, M.: Visualizing transmedia networks: links, paths and peripheries. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanescu, R., Olsson, C., M.: Designing a conceptual framework for reusable Alternate Reality Games. Master’s thesis, University of Malmo (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tomashevskij, B.: Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1965)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan Javanshir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Beth Carroll
    • 1
  • David E. Millard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations