Advertisement

Towards Evaluating Architectural Design of Ancient Pilgrimage Site Using Agent Based Modelling and Simulation

  • Abha TrivediEmail author
  • Mayank Pandey
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11278)

Abstract

In India, there are many ancient pilgrimage sites with high religious significance. These sites experience a huge surge of crowd on auspicious occasions. The old infrastructure of these pilgrimage sites is not capable to accommodate present crowded situations. Nowadays, these sites are getting congested due to the encroachment on the nearby areas. These conditions make them vulnerable to tragic incidents. Modelling and simulation technology provides a platform to do the comprehensive assessment of architectural designs on different crowded situations. In this paper, we have created near to real virtual environment of an ancient pilgrimage site in an Agent Based Modelling tool. We have created intelligent agents that act, react and interact within this virtual environment. The crowd of intelligent agents are simulated for three different emergency evacuation scenarios and two different dimensions of gates. Subsequently, we explored the effect on emergency evacuation time with respect to dimensions of gates, location of gates and population size inside the temple. The simulation results establish the applicability of our methodology.

Keywords

Agent Based Modelling Emergency evacuation Design evaluation NetLogo 

References

  1. 1.
    Almeida, J.E., Kokkinogenis, Z., Rossetti, R. J.: Netlogo implementation of an evacuation scenario. In: WISA 2012 (Fourth Workshop on Intelligent Systems and Applications), Madrid, Spain, 20–23 June 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Axelrod, R.: Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. Handb. Comput. Econ. 2, 1565–1584 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandini, S., Manzoni, S., Vizzari, G.: Agent based modeling and simulation: an informatics perspective. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12(4), 4 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, X., Zhan, F.B.: Agent-based modelling and simulation of urban evacuation: relative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged evacuation strategies. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59(1), 25–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S.: Calibration of pedestrian simulation model for emergency doors by pedestrian type. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2316, 69–75 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dias, C., Sarvi, M., Shiwakoti, N., Ejtemai, O., Burd, M.: Investigating collective escape behaviours in complex situations. Saf. Sci. 60, 87–94 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Escobar, R., De La Rosa, A.: Architectural design for the survival optimization of panicking fleeing victims. In: Banzhaf, W., Ziegler, J., Christaller, T., Dittrich, P., Kim, J.T. (eds.) ECAL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2801, pp. 97–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fruin, J.: Designing for Pedestrians. Public Transportation United States (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helbing, D., Molnar, P.: Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51(5), 4282 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Helbing, D., Mukerji, P.: Crowd disasters as systemic failures: analysis of the love parade disaster. EPJ Data Sci. 1(1), 7 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoogendoorn, S., Daamen, W., Boer, A., Vaatstra, I.: Assessing passenger comfort and capacity bottlenecks in Dutch train stations. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2002, 107–116 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ijaz, K., Sohail, S., Hashish, S.: A survey of latest approaches for crowd simulation and modeling using hybrid techniques. In: 17th UKSIMAMSS International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, pp. 111–116 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Illera, C., et al.: NO\_PANIC. “Escape and Panic in Buildings”–architectural basic research in the context of security and safety research. In: Klingsch, W., Rogsch, C., Schadschneider, A., Schreckenberg, M. (eds.) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2_71Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kasthala, S., Lakra, H.S.: Disaster preparedness for mass religious gatherings in India-learning from case studies. In: Second World Congress on Disaster Management (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santos, G., Aguirre, B.E.: A Critical Review of Emergency Evacuation Simulation Models (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi, X., Ye, Z., Shiwakoti, N., Tang, D., Wang, C., Wang, W.: Empirical investigation on safety constraints of merging pedestrian crowd through macroscopic and microscopic analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 95, 405–416 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shinde, K.: Religious Tourism and Religious Tolerance: Insights from Pilgrimage Sites in India, vol. 70 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shiwakoti, N., Shi, X., Ye, Z., Liu, Y., Lin, J.: A comparative study of pedestrian crowd flow at middle and corner exits. In: The 38th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2016), pp. 1–10. Australasian Transport Research Forum (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, E.R., Conrey, F.R.: Agent-based modeling: a new approach for theory building in social psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11(1), 87–104 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Still, G.K.: Introduction to Crowd Science. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tolea, M.I., et al.: Sex-specific correlates of walking speed in a wide age-ranged population. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.65(2), 174–184 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trivedi, A., Pandey, M.: Agent-based modelling and simulation of religious crowd gatherings in India. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Chaki, N., Konar, D., Chakraborty, U.K., Singh, C.T. (eds.) Advanced Computational and Communication Paradigms. AISC, vol. 706, pp. 465–472. Springer, Singapore (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8237-5_45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, X., Li, J.: Study on the simulation models for pedestrian evacuation movement. Int. J. Digit. Content Technol. Appl. 7(8), 503 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Was, J., Lubaa, R.: Towards realistic and effective agent-based models of crowd dynamics. Neurocomputing 146, 199–209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Westminister: Trimble juno series handhelds: Juno 3B and juno 3D, user guide (2012). https://gis14.uwec.edu/GeoSpatialResources/Manuals.htm
  26. 26.
    Wilensky, U.: Netlogo 5.2 (1999). https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
  27. 27.
    Zhou, S., Chen, D., Cai, W., Luo, L., Low, M.Y.H., Tian, F., Tay, V.S.H., Ong, D.W.S., Hamilton, B.D.: Crowd modeling and simulation technologies. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. (TOMACS) 20(4), 20 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GIS Cell, Motilal Nehru National Institute of TechnologyAllahabadIndia
  2. 2.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentMotilal Nehru National Institute of TechnologyAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations