Advertisement

Modeling the Political Geography of Presidential Voting

  • David Darmofal
  • Ryan Strickler
Chapter
Part of the Spatial Demography Book Series book series (SPDE, volume 2)

Abstract

In this chapter we model the political geography of partisan voting that we identified in Chap. 2. We do so for each presidential election from 1828 through 2016 using a common set of covariates for each election. These covariates capture some of the principal fault lines in American political history: race, immigration, and the rural-urban divide. We find that the effects of these variables on partisan voting have changed in meaningful ways over the course of American electoral history.

References

  1. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (2005). Spatial regression analysis in R: A workbook. Typescript. Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  3. Anselin, L., & Rey, S. (1991). Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis, 23(2), 112–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial 1634 dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bera, A. K., & Yoon, M. J. (1993). Specification testing with locally misspecified alternatives. 1645 Econometric Theory, 9, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darmofal, D. (2015). Spatial analysis for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. King, D. S., & Smith, R. M. (2005). Racial orders in American political development. American Political Science Review, 99, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mink, G. (1990). Old labor and new immigrants in American political development: Union, party and state, 1875–1920. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15(3), 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Darmofal
    • 1
  • Ryan Strickler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceColorado State University PuebloPuebloUSA

Personalised recommendations