Advertisement

Geographic Polarization in Historical Perspective

  • David Darmofal
  • Ryan Strickler
Chapter
Part of the Spatial Demography Book Series book series (SPDE, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter provides a focused analysis of the “sorting” thesis presented by Bill Bishop in his book The Big Sort. Published in 2008, the book argues that education and economic prosperity have allowed individuals to move to communities that match their tastes and lifestyles. While not explicitly driven by desires for partisan homogeneity, the practical consequence of these trends is increasing Democratic and Republican geographic enclaves. Recent research does confirm that geographic polarization has increased in recent decades, although many scholars point to other factors besides migration as the primary cause. Neither Bishop nor this recent research, however, considers the partisan landscape prior to WWII. We take Bishop’s concept of “landslide” partisan counties and examine partisan voting patterns since 1828. We do find that the country has grown more “sorted” since 1976 (Bishop’s baseline year for analysis); we also find that education is increasingly correlated with county-level voting patterns—a key expectation of Bishop’s argument. However, we also show that the percentage of the voting public living in heavily or “landslide” partisan counties in the twenty-first century is well within a normal historical range. This context is vital to assessing the novelty of, or normative concern for, our modern political landscape.

References

  1. Abrams, S. J., & Fiorina, M. P. (2012). The big sort that wasn’t: A skeptical reexamination. PS: Political Science and Politics, 45(2), 203–210.Google Scholar
  2. Anastasopoulos, L. J. (2017). Migration, immigration, and the political geography of American cities. American Politics Research. Online First Edition: 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J.M. (2006). Purple America. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop, B., with Cushing, R. G. (2008). The Big Sort: Why the clustering of like-minded Americans is tearing us apart. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, J., & Rodden, J. (2013). Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political geography and electoral bias in legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8(3), 239–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2013). Voter migration and the geographic sorting of the American electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 856–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darmofal, D., & Strickler, R. (2016). Bringing together spatial demography and political science: Reexamining the big sort. In F. M. Howell & J. R. Porter (Eds.), Recapturing space: New middle-range theory in spatial demography (pp. 139–156). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B.. (1957). The Negro population of Chicago: A study of residential segregation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Farhi, P. (2004). Elephants are red, donkeys are blue, color is sweet, so their states we hue. Washington Post, November 2, 2004. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17079-2004Nov1.html Google Scholar
  11. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. (2010). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  12. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(3), 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2015). Seeking politically compatible neighbors? The role of neighborhood partisan composition in residential sorting. Political Geography, 48, 130–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston, R., Manley, D., & Jones, K. (2016). Spatial polarization of presidential voting in the United States, 1992–2012: The ‘Big Sort’ revisited. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(5), 1047–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Key, V. O., Jr. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  17. Kinsella, C., McTague, C., & Raleigh, K. N. (2015). Unmasking geographic polarization and clustering: A micro-scalar analysis of partisan voting behavior. Applied Geography, 62, 404–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klinkner, P. A. (2004). Red and blue scare: The continuing diversity of the American electoral landscape. The Forum, 2(2), Article 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
  19. Levendusky, M., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Red states vs. blue states: Going beyond the mean. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin, G. J., & Webster, S. (2017). Does residential sorting explain geographic polarization? Unpublished manuscript. http://polisci.emory.edu/faculty/gjmart2/papers/partisan_sorting_density.pdf Google Scholar
  21. Massey, D. S., Rothwell, J., & Domina, T. (2009). The changing bases of segregation in the United States. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 626(1), 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGhee, E., & Krimm, D. (2009). Party registration and the geography of party polarization. Polity, 41(3), 345–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mummolo, J., & Nall, C. (2017). Why partisans do not sort: The constraints on political segregation. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myers, A. S. (2013). Secular geographical polarization in the American south: The case of Texas, 1996–2010. Electoral Studies, 32(1), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Political Polarization in the American Public. (2014). Pew Research Center. http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-12-2014-Political-Polarization-Release.pdf
  28. Rodden, J. (2010). The geographic distribution of political preferences. Annual Review of Political Science, 13(1), 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scher, R. K. (1997). Politics in the New South: Republicanism, race and leadership in the twentieth century (2nd ed.). Armonk/New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  31. Strickler, R. (2016). A “sorted” America? Geographic polarization and value overlap in the American electorate. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sussell, J. (2013). New support for the big sort hypothesis: An assessment of partisan geographic sorting in California, 1992–2010. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(04), 768–73.Google Scholar
  33. Tesler, M. (2016). Post-racial or most-racial? Race and politics in the Obama era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Darmofal
    • 1
  • Ryan Strickler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceColorado State University PuebloPuebloUSA

Personalised recommendations