Advertisement

Shadow Education as Text of “Curriculum of Difference”: Nomadic Inquiry

  • Young Chun KimEmail author
  • Jung-Hoon Jung
Chapter
Part of the Curriculum Studies Worldwide book series (CSWW)

Abstract

This chapter explores potential inquiry perspectives for research about shadow education. The authors propose a form of ‘nomadic inquiry,’ in which research not characterized by fidelity to a master narrative, but by transformations of concepts, ideas, and representations that welcome difference. Invoking shadow education as a text of ‘difference,’ the authors suggest topics and approaches for future studies on shadow education. This chapter is an invitation to curriculum scholars around the world to consider the phenomenon of shadow education within their own inquires. The authors hope that by incorporating new understandings and insights from different perspectives, the field of curriculum studies can benefit and the concepts of education and curriculum can evolve alongside the changing ecology of education.

References

  1. Ahn, S. Y., & Baek, H. J. (2013). Academic achievement-oriented society and its relationship to the psychological well-being of Korean adolescents. In C. C. Yi (Ed.), The psychological well-being of East Asian youth (pp. 265–279). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. (1990). Ideology and curriculum (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Aspinall, R., & Roesgaard, M. H. (2008). Japanese education and the cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the juku. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 34(1), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aurini, J., Davies, S., & Dierkes, J. (Hrsg.). (2013). Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education (International Perspectives on Education and Society). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Bae, S., Oh, H., Kim, H., Lee, C., & Oh, B. (2010). The impact of after-school programs on educational equality and private tutoring expenses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, S. J., Thrupp, M., & Forsey, M. (2010). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  8. Bray, M. (2003). Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring: Dimensions, implications and government responses. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  9. Bray, M. (2011). The challenge of shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Bray, M. (2014). The impact of shadow education on student academic achievement: Why the research is inconclusive and what can be done about it. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15, 381–389.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9326-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2015). Evolving ecosystems in education: The nature and implications of private supplementary tutoring in Hong Kong. Prospects, 45(4), 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good: Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  13. Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Bangkok, Thailand: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  14. Britzmann, D. P. (1989). Who has the floor? Curriculum, teaching, and the English student teacher’s struggle for voice. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(2), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberal stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  16. Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89, 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bullough, R. V. (1989). First-year teacher: A case study. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bullough, R. V., & Knowles, J. G. (1989). Becoming a teacher: Struggles of a second-career beginning teacher. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(2), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Byun, S. (2010). Does policy matter in shadow education spending? Revisiting the effects of the high school equalization policy in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carr, D., & Wang, L. C. (2015). The effect of after-school classes on private tuition, mental health and academic outcomes: Evidence from Korea. Available at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0038038516677219?journalCode=soca.
  22. Chan, C., & Bray, M. (2014). Marketized private tutoring as a supplement to regular schooling: Liberal studies and the shadow sector in Hong Kong secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen, J. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Choi, J., & Cho, R. M. (2016). Evaluating the effects of governmental regulations on South Korean private cram schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cummings, W. K. (1997). Private education in Eastern Asia. In W. K. Cummings & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), The challenge of Eastern Asian education: Implications for America (pp. 135–152). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (2010). The schooled society: An introduction to the sociology of education (2nd ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Silva, W. A., Gunawardena, C., Jayaweera, S., Perera, L., Rupasinghe, S., & Wijetunge, S. (1991). Extra-school instruction, social equity and educational quality (Sri Lanka). Report prepared for the International Development Research Centre, Singapore.Google Scholar
  30. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Doll, W. E. Jr. (2012). Pragmatism, post-modernism, and complexity theory: The ‘fascinating imaginative realm’ of William E. Doll, Jr. (D. Trueit, Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Entrich, S. R. (2017). Shadow education and social inequalities in Japan: Evolving patterns and conceptual implications. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Falzon, P. A., & Busuttil, J. (1988). Private tuition in Malta: A hidden educational phenomenon revealed (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Malta, Masida, Malta.Google Scholar
  34. Foondun, A. R. (2002). The issues of private tuition: An analysis of the practice in Mauritius and selected South-East Asian countries. International Review of Education, 48(6), 485–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  36. Fung, A. (2012). Cram schooling in Hong Kong: The privatization of public education. Asian Anthropology, 2(1), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gillen-O’Neel, C., Huynh, V. W., & Fuligni, A. J. (2013). To study or to sleep? The academic costs of extra studying at the expense of sleep. Child Development, 84(1), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gök, F. (2010). Marketing hope: Private institutions preparing students for the university entrance examination in Turkey. In K. Amos (Ed.), International Educational Governance (pp. 123–134). London: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school. Highstown, NJ: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Goodson, I. F. (1984). Subjects of study: Toward a social history of curriculum. In I. Goodson & S. Ball (Eds.), Defining the curriculum: Histories and ethnographies (pp. 25–44). London, UK: Falmer.Google Scholar
  41. Gough, N. (2003). Thinking globally in environmental education: Implications for internationalizing curriculum inquiry. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 53–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Grumet, M. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  43. Halliday. (2016). Private education, positional goods, and the arms race problem. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 15(2), 150–169.Google Scholar
  44. Ham, S. D. (2007). After-school as a type of after-school program. In Korea Education Research Institute [KEDI] (Ed.), The international seminar on supporting after school programs (pp. 49–70). Seoul, Korea: KEDI.Google Scholar
  45. Hartmann, S. (2013). Education “home delivery” in Egypt: Private tutoring and social stratification. In M. Bray, A. E. Mazawi, & R. G. Sultana (Eds.), Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity (pp. 57–75). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hof, S. (2014). Does private tutoring work? The effectiveness of private tutoring: A nonparametric bounds analysis. Education Economics, 22(4), 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ireson, J. (2004). Private tutoring: How prevalent and effective is it? London Review of Education, 2(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kanu, Y. (2006). Curriculum as cultural practices: Postcolonial imaginations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kassotakis, M., & Verdis, A. (2013). Shadow education in Greece: Characteristics, consequences and eradication efforts. In M. Bray, A. E. Mazawi, & R. G. Sultana (Eds.), Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity (pp. 93–113). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim, Y. C. (2016). Shadow education, curriculum, and culture of schooling in South Korea. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kim, Y. C., Jung, J. H., & Lee, Y. M. (2003). Ugly duckling: First year elementary school teachers’ lives. Seoul: Mooneumsa.Google Scholar
  53. Kim, Y. C., Jung, J. H., & Lee, Y. M. (2006). Ugly duckling: First year elementary schoolteachers’ lives. Seoul: Mooneumsa.Google Scholar
  54. Kincheloe, J. L. (1991). Willis Morris and the Southern curriculum: Emancipating the Southern ghosts. In J. L. Kincheloe & W. F. Pinar (Eds.), Curriculum as social psychoanalysis: The significance of place (pp. 123–154). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  55. Korean Educational Statistics Service. (2017). The statistical features of Korean education. Seoul: Korean Educational Statistics Service.Google Scholar
  56. Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee, C. J. (2005). Korean education fever and private tutoring. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 2(1), 99–107.Google Scholar
  59. Lee, C. J., Lee, H., & Jang, H.-M. (2010). The history of policy responses to shadow education in South Korea: Implications for the next cycle of policy responses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee, C. Y. (2010). Case study about hakwon teachers’ educational culture (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Korea University.Google Scholar
  61. Lee, J. (2007). Two worlds of private tutoring: The prevalence and causes of after-school mathematics tutoring in Korea and the United States. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1207–1234.Google Scholar
  62. Lee, J., & Zhou, M. (2015). The Asian American achievement paradox. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Lee, J. Y. (2013). Private tutoring and its impact on students’ academic achievement, formal schooling and educational inequality in Korea (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  65. Majumdar, M. (2014). The shadow school system and new class divisions in India. London: Max Weber Stiftung.Google Scholar
  66. Marimuthu, T., Singh, J. S., Ahmad, K., Lim, H. K., Mukherjee, H., Oman, S., … & Leong, L. T. (1991). Extra-school instruction, social equity and educational quality. Singapore: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, J. L. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mori, I. (2013). Supplementary education in the United States: Policy, context, characteristics, and challenges. In J. Aurini, S. Davies, & J. Dierkes (Eds.), Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education (pp. 191–207). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mori, I., & Baker, D. (2010). The origin of universal shadow education: What the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the postmodern institution of education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nath, S. R. (2008). Private supplementary tutoring among primary students in Bangladesh. Educational Studies, 34(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oh My News. (2012, May 9). Influence of excessive hakwon education on children’s development. Retrieved from http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/view/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD = A0001730187.
  72. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Retrieved September 2, 2017 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/50036771.pdf.
  73. Ozaki, M. (2015). A juku childhood: Children’s experiences in juku attendance and its relation to their well-being in Japan (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bath, Claverton Down, UK.Google Scholar
  74. Pallegedara, A. (2011). Demand for private tuition classes under the free education policy: Evidence based on Sri Lanka. Munich: Munich personal RePEc archive. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchende/31969/1/MPRA_paper_31969.pdf.
  75. Paramita, S. (2015). “We follow the private tutors not the teachers”: An ethnographic insight into educational practices among the students of an Indian city. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 4(4), 819–840.Google Scholar
  76. Park, H. (2008). An analysis of the relationship between the quality of the school education and the participation in the private tutoring. Asian Educational Research, 9(4), 61–77.Google Scholar
  77. Park, H., Buchmann, C., Choi, J., & Merry, J. J. (2016). Learning beyond the school walls: Trends and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Park, S., Lim, H., & Choi, H. (2015). “Gangnam Mom”: A qualitative study on the information behaviors of Korean helicopter mothers. In iConference 2015 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/73636/124_ready.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
  79. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Paviot, L., Heinsohn, N., & Korkman, J. (2008). Extra tuition in southern and eastern Africa: Coverage, growth, and linkages with pupil achievement. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pinar, W. (2007). Intellectual advancement through disciplinarity: Verticality and horizontality in curriculum studies. Rotterdam, The Netherland: Sense.Google Scholar
  82. Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography, politics, and sexuality: Essays in curriculum theory 1972–1992. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  83. Pinar, W. F. (2014). International handbook of curriculum research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Pinar, W. F. (2015). Educational experience as lived: Knowledge, history, alterity. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pinar, W. F., & Grumet, M. R. (2015). Toward a poor curriculum. Kingston, NY: Educator’s International Press.Google Scholar
  86. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  87. Rizvi, F. (2016). Privatization in education: Trends and consequences. UNESCO. Retrieved March 23, 2017 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002464/246485E.pdf.
  88. Said, E. (1993). The politics of knowledge. In C. McCarthy & W. Crichlow (Eds.), Race, identity and representation in education (pp. 306–314). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Schneider, B., & Lee, Y. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(4), 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schubert, W., & Ayers, W. (1992). Do the right thing: Ethical issues and problems in the conduct of qualitative research in the classroom. Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 19–24.Google Scholar
  91. Seth, M. J. (2002). Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  92. Smith, L. T. (2013). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  93. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sun, M., & Braeye, S. (2012). Comparing supplementary ethnic schools and the academic achievement of Chinese immigrant students in Quebec and Flanders. Diversité urbaine, 121, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tokyo Metropolitan Government. (2008). Charenji shien tokubetsu kashituke jigyou nit suite [Regarding the “challenge support” special loan policy].Google Scholar
  96. Trent, J. (2016). Constructing professional identities in shadow education: Perspectives of private supplementary educators in Hong Kong. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 15(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tsang, M. C., Ding, X., & Shen, H. (2010). Urban-rural disparities in private tutoring of lower secondary students. Economics of Education Review, 2, 7–11. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  98. Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 178–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yamamoto, Y., & Brinton, M. C. (2010). Cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of Japan. Sociology of Education, 83(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Yang, I., & Kim, B. C. (2010). A qualitative case study on the school life of middle school students who go to private educational institute. The Korea Educational Review, 16(3), 117–153.Google Scholar
  101. Zhan, S. (2014). The private tutoring industry in Taiwan: Government policies and their implementation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhou, M. (2008). The ethnic system of supplementary education: Non-profit and for profit institutions in Los Angeles’ Chinese immigrant community. In M. Shinn & H. Yoshikawa (Eds.), Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs (pp. 229–251). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhou, M., & Kim, S. (2006). Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhou, Y., & Wang, D. (2015). The family socioeconomic effect on extra lessons in Greater China: A comparison between Shanghai, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinju National University of EducationJinjuKorea (Republic of)
  2. 2.Chonnam National UniversityGwangjuKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations