Skip to main content

Shaping Health and Safety, 1800–2015

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the historical development of health and safety since the nineteenth century, including substantial analysis of the otherwise much-neglected post-1960 period. This includes identifying a movement from detailed specifications about standards to more open-ended duties to be performed to safeguard people’s safety and health. In addition, analysis suggests that the location of debate about health and safety shifts from the workplace to a more diffuse and public arena, entering high politics and ‘public opinion’ as a concern. It also identifies gaps in historical study, notably around gender and newer forms of employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    RoSPA , ‘Sixth Annual Report of Head of Agricultural Safety Division’, 12 June 1964, p. 2 (National Archives Scotland, Edinburgh (NAS), AF59.152); RoSPA, Minutes of the National Agricultural Safety Committee, 24 September 1965, p. 2 (RoSPA Archives, Birmingham, D/266/2/25).

  2. 2.

    Untitled Memorandum, Chief Inspector of Factories to Managing Directors and Managers of Firms Employing More Than 50 (n.d., c. 1969), p. 1. Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick (MRC), MSS.292D/146/18/1.

  3. 3.

    ‘TUC Representatives’ Comments, Industrial Safety Advisory Council, Joint Safety Organisation’, 10 July 1968, p. 1. MRC, MSS.292B/146/17/2.

  4. 4.

    TUC, ‘National Joint Advisory Council, Industrial Safety Sub-Committee, Notes for Meeting 17 November 1964’, p. 1. MRC, MSS.292B/146.17.1.

  5. 5.

    R. Williams, ‘A Key Issue’, Work Hazards 21 (c. 1979), p. 5. Samuel Barr Collection, Glasgow Caledonian University, GCU DC 140/2/1/2.

  6. 6.

    Written Evidence of the Dock and Harbour Authorities’ Association to the Robens Committee , (n.d., c. 1971), p. 3. TNA, LAB 96/57.

  7. 7.

    Written Evidence of RoSPA to the Robens Committee , (n.d., c. 1971), p. 7. TNA, LAB 96/75.

  8. 8.

    Verbatim Report of TUC Conference on the Robens Committee Report, 12 October 1972, p. 36. TUC Library, HD 7273.

  9. 9.

    J. Tubby, ‘Safety Act Not Good Enough’, The Land Worker, April 1979, p. 6. Museum of English Rural Life (MERL), University of Reading .

  10. 10.

    Brian Watson, Interviewed by David Walker (2005), Scottish Oral History Centre. University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC7 (2004–2005).

  11. 11.

    ‘Fit for Work, Fit for Life, Fit for tomorrow’. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/publications/fit3.htm.

  12. 12.

    Speech to the Conservative Party Conference, 1 October 2008; Reported by The Guardian, at http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/oct/01/davidcameron.toryconference1.

  13. 13.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/health-and-safety-reform.

  14. 14.

    http://www.hse.gov.uk/contact/myth-busting.htm.

References

Primary Sources

  • Allen, B. D. (1966, March 4). Almost Full Inspection Within 17 Months. Municipal and Public Services Journal, 78, 691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Building Businesses…Not Barriers. (1986). Cmnd.9794. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2014). Trade Union Membership 2013 Statistical Bulletin. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chief Inspector of Factories. (n.d., c. 1969). Untitled Memorandum, to Managing Directors and Managers of Firms Employing More Than 50. Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick (MRC), MSS.292D/146/18/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment and Productivity. (1970). Annual Report of H.M. Chief Inspector of Factories, 1969. Cmnd. 4461. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment. (1973). Annual Report, H.M. Chief Inspector of Factories, 1972. Cmnd. 5398. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). (2000). Revitalising Health and Safety: Strategy Statement. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dock and Harbour Authorities’ Association. (n.d., c. 1971). Written Evidence to the Robens Committee. The National Archives of the UK, London [TNA], LAB 96/57.

    Google Scholar 

  • DWP. (2013, February). Common Sense Restored to Health and Safety. DWP Press Release. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/common-sense-restored-to-health-and-safety. Accessed 30 April 2015.

  • Employment Committee. (1982, June 16). The Working of the HSC and E, Minutes of Evidence (HC 400-ii). London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, J. (2014). How the HSW Act Came About (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, P. (2005). Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement (The Hampton Review). London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSC. (1994). Review of Health and Safety Regulation: Main Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (1980). Health and Safety, Manufacturing and Service Industries, Report for 1978. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (1988). The Tolerability of Risks from Nuclear Power Stations. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2005). Fit for Work, Fit for Life, Fit for Tomorrow. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/publications/fit3.htm.

  • HSE. (2006, April 13). Sensible Risk Management (HSE Board Paper HSE/06/46).

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. (2012). Myth Busters Challenge Panel. http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/myth-busting/index.htm.

  • Industrial Health and Safety Bulletin. (1971). Total Loss Control (Spring), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, P. (2000, November 10). Join My Opera Chorus: Open Roads for All. Times (Suppl.), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnersly, P. (1976). The Right to Work and Live in a Safe, Healthy Environment. In J. Dale & T. Emerson (Eds.), Jobs and the Environment (pp. 3–7). West Kingsdown: SERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkup, J. (2012, January 5). Coalition Plans to Kill Off ‘Health and Safety Monster’ with Limits on Lawyers’ Fees’. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8995276/Coalition-plans-to-kill-off-health-and-safety-monster-with-limits-on-lawyers-fees.html. Accessed 30 April 2015.

  • Laurance, J. (1988, March 9). Paying the Wages of Peril. The Guardian, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifting the Burden. (1985). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R. (2011). Reclaiming Health and Safety for All: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation (The Löfstedt Review). London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Robens. (1972). Safety and Health at Work: Report of the Committee 1970–72 (The Robens Report). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Young. (2010). Common Sense, Common Safety (The Young Review). London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrory, R. (2006). Regulatory Justice: Sanctioning in a Post-Hampton World (The Macrory Review). London: Better Regulation Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour. (1962). Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories, 1961. Cmnd. 1816. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour. (1964). Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories, 1963. Cmnd. 2450. London: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, A. (1975, February 7). Faults in Safety Laws. Morning Star, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA). (1964, June 12). Sixth Annual Report of Head of Agricultural Safety Division. National Archives Scotland, Edinburgh, AF59.152.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoSPA. (1965, September 24). Minutes of the National Agricultural Safety Committee. RoSPA Archives, Birmingham, D/266/2/25.

    Google Scholar 

  • RoSPA. (n.d., c. 1971). Written Evidence to the Robens Committee. TNA, LAB 96/75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelberg, R. (1971, May). Chaos in British Industry. Times, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, A. (2010, June 13). Tories Start Drive to Cut Health and Safety Rules. The Observer. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/jun/13/tories-start-health-safety-rules-cuts. Accessed 30 April 2015.

  • Temple, M. (2014). Triennial Review Report: Health and Safety Executive [The Temple Review]. London: HMSO. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/triennial-review-report-health-and-safety-executive-2014.

  • Times. (1973, January 31). Accidents Caused by Unguarded Minds, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times. (1980, July 26). Concern Over Staff Cuts at Health and Safety Body, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubby, J. (1979, April). Safety Act Not Good Enough. The Land Worker (p. 6). Museum of English Rural Life, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUC. (1964, November 17). National Joint Advisory Council, Industrial Safety Sub-Committee, Notes for Meeting. MRC, MSS.292B/146.17.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUC. (1968, July 10). Representatives’ Comments, Industrial Safety Advisory Council, Joint Safety Organisation. MRC, MSS.292B/146/17/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUC. (1972, October 12). Verbatim Report of TUC Conference on the Robens Committee Report. TUC Library, HD 7273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B. (2005). Interviewed by David Walker, Chemical Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre. University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC7 (2004–2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (c. 1979). ‘A Key Issue’, Work Hazards 21 (c. 1979). Samuel Barr Collection, Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU) DC 140/2/1/2.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Ackers, P. (2014). Game Changer: Hugh Clegg’s Role in Drafting the 1968 Donovan Report and Redefining the British Industrial Relations Policy-Problem. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 35(3), 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, M. (1997). Safety First. Technology, Labor and Business in the Building of American Work Safety, 1870–1939. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, P. (2009). The Dangers of Hanging Baskets: Regulatory Myths’ and Media Representations of Health and Safety Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(3), 352–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, P. (2013). Corporate Manslaughter and Regulatory Reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, P. (2015). Revolution Blues: The Reconstruction of Health and Safety Law as ‘Common-Sense Regulation’. Journal of Law and Society, 42(2), 202–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, P., & Esbester, M. (2016). Il/Legit.imate Risks? Public Opinion and Health and Safety Regulation in Post-1960 Britain. In T. Crook & M. Esbester (Eds.), Governing Risks: Danger, Safety and Accidents in Modern Britain, c. 1800–2000 (pp. 295–314). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. (1987). Health and Safety at Work: Consensus and Self-Regulation. In R. Baldwin & C. McCrudden (Eds.), Regulation and Public Law. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. (1996). Regulatory Legitimacy in the European Context: The British Health and Safety Executive. In G. Majone (Ed.), Regulating Europe (pp. 83–105). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D., & Ball-King, L. (2013). Safety Management and Public Spaces: Restoring Balance. Risk Analysis, 33(5), 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balleisen, E. J., & Brake, E. K. (2014). Historical Perspective and Better Regulatory Governance: An Agenda for Institutional Reform. Regulation & Governance, 8(2), 222–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandle, T. (2007). Tolerability of Risk: The Regulator’s Story’. In F. Bouder, D. Slavin & R. Löfstedt (Eds.), The Tolerability of Risk: A New Framework for Risk Management (pp. 93–103). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (1982). British Government Inspection, 1832–75: Some Observations. Historical Journal, 25(3), 605–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (1983). State Intervention in Mid-Nineteenth Century Britain: Fact or Fiction? Journal of British Studies, 23, 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (1996). “Petticoat Pestering”: The Women’s Trade Union League and Lead Poisoning in the Staffordshire Potteries, 1890–1914. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 2(2), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (1998). Too Little, Too Late? The Home Office and the Asbestos Industry Regulations, 1931. Medical History, 42(4), 421–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (2001). The Way from Dusty Death: Turner & Newall and the Regulation of Occupational Health in the British Asbestos Industry 1890s–1970s. London: Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (2002). The Home Office and the Dangerous Trades: Regulating Occupational Disease in Victorian and Edwardian Britain. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P. (2014). “Enveloped in Fog”: The Asbestos Problem in Britain’s Royal Naval Dockyards, 1949–1999. International Journal of Maritime History, 26(4), 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartrip, P., & Fenn, P. T. (1983). The Evolution of Regulatory Style in the Nineteenth Century British Factory Inspectorate. Journal of Law and Society, 10(2), 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., & C. Woolfson, C. (2000). The Regulation of Health and Safety in Britain: From Old Labour to New Labour. Industrial Relations Journal, 31(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (2008). Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2000). Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, S., & Tweedale, G. (2003). Mondays Without Dread: The Trade Union Response to Byssinosis in the Lancashire Cotton Industry in the Twentieth Century. Social History of Medicine, 16(1), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. (2011). Oral History, Occupational Health and Safety and Scottish Steel, c. 1930–1988. Scottish Labour History, 46, 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1985). To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotherstone, T., & Manson, H. (2007). North Sea Oil, Its Narratives and Its History: An Archive of Oral Documentation and the Making of Contemporary Britain. Northern Scotland, 27, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotherstone, T., & Manson, H. (2011). Voices of Piper Alpha: Enduring Injury in Private Memory, Oral Representation and Labour History. Scottish Labour History, 46, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. (2011). The Changing Character of Public Inquiries in the (Risk) Regulatory State. British Politics, 6(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, W. G. (1979). The Conventionalisation of Early Factory Crime. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7(1), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, W. G. (1982). The Other Price of Britain’s Oil. Oxford: L.M. Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, H. A. (1985). A History of British Trade Unions Since 1889 (Vol. 2). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, H. A., Fox, A., & Thompson, A. (1964). A History of British Trade Unions since 1889 (Vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R., & Luckin, B. (1997). ‘Accidents in History: An Introduction’. In R. Cooter & B. Luckin (Eds.), Accidents in History: Injuries, Fatalities and Social Relations (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P. (2007). Compulsion, Voluntarism, and Venereal Disease: Governing Sexual Health in England After the Contagious Diseases Acts. Journal of British Studies, 46, 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, T., & Esbester, M. (2016). Risk and the History of Governing Modern Britain, c. 1800–2000. In T. Crook and M. Esbester (Eds.), Governing Risks in Modern Britain: Danger, Safety and Accidents, c. 1800–2000 (pp. 1–26). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S., Willman, P., Clinton, A., & Bamford, M. (1988). Safety at Work: The Limits of Self-Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, A. (2006). The Core Executive’s Approach to Regulation: From ‘Better Regulation’ to ‘Risk-Tolerant Deregulation’. Social Policy & Administration, 40(5), 526–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichener, V. (1997). Effective European Problem-Solving: Lessons from the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Environmental Protection. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 591–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esbester, M. (forthcoming). The Birth of Modern Safety: Preventing Worker Accidents on Britain’s Railways, 1871–1948. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. J. (1978). Social Policy 1830–1914: Individualism, Collectivism and the Origins of the Welfare State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J. (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, W. M. (1950). History of English Public Health, 1834–1939. London: Balilliere, Tindall, and Cox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (1994). The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilad, S. (2011). It Runs in the Family: Meta-Regulation and Its Siblings. Regulation & Governance, 4(3), 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M., & Wikeley, N. (1999). Too Little, Too Late? The Home Office and the Asbestos Industry Regulations, 1931: A Reply. Medical History, 43(4), 508–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, W. H. (1983). The British Political Tradition. Vol. 1, The Rise of Collectivism. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (1989). “Some of Them Gets Lead Poisoned”: Occupational Lead Exposure in Women, 1880–1914. Social History of Medicine, 2(2), 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (1990). Suffer the Working Day: Women in the “Dangerous Trades”, 1880–1914. Women’s Studies International Forum, 13(1–2), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B., & Nolan, M. (2004). Reflections in Colonial Glass? Women Factory Inspectors in Britain and New Zealand 1893-1921. Women’s History Review, 13(2), 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. (2002). Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D., & Tweedale, G. (2010). Oil on the Water: Government Regulation of a Carcinogen in the Twentieth-Century Lancashire Cotton Spinning Industry. Business History, 52(5), 695–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgison, A. (2005). Asbestos and British Trade Unions, 1960s and 1970s. Scottish Labour History, 40, 70–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. (1988). Protective Legislation, the Capitalist State and Working-Class Men: The Case of the 1842 Mines Regulation Act. In R. E. Pahl (Ed.), On Work: Historical, Comparative and Theoretical Approaches (pp. 95–124). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, B. L., & Harrison, A. (1911). A History of Factory Legislation (2nd ed.). London: P. S. King & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, B. (1997). Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, B., & Manning, P. (1990). The Contexts of Regulation: The Impacts Upon Health and Safety Inspectorates in Britain. Law and Policy, 12(2), 103–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (Ed.). (2015). Stress in Post-War Britain, 1945–85. London: Pickering and Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2000a). Lethal Work: A History of the Asbestos Tragedy in Scotland. East Linton: Tuckwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2000b). Whatever Happened to the Occupational Health Service? The NHS, the OHS and the Asbestos Tragedy on Clydeside. In C. Nottingham (Ed.), The NHS in Scotland: The Legacy of the Past and the Prospect of the Future (pp. 79–105): Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2004a). Dangerous Work, Hard Men and Broken Bodies: Masculinity in the Clydeside Heavy Industries, c. 1930s–1970s. Labour History Review, 69(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2004b). Oral History, Subjectivity and Environmental Reality: Occupational Health Histories in Twentieth-Century Scotland. Osiris, 19, 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2007). Miners’ Lung. A History of Dust Disease in British Coal Mining. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (1983a). The Home Office and Working Conditions 1914 to 1940 (Unpublished PhD thesis). London University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (1983b). ‘Employers’ Welfare Schemes and Industrial Relations in Inter-War Britain, Business History, 25(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (1985). An Inspector Calls: Health and Safety at Work in Inter-War Britain. In P. Weindling (Ed.), The Social History of Occupational Health (pp. 223–239). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (1994). Health and Society in Twentieth-Century Britain. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, P. (2013). Victorian Social Investigation and the Children’s Employment Commission, 1840–42. In N. Goose & K. Honeyman (Eds), Children and Childhood in Industrial England: Diversity and Agency, 1650–1900. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostal, R. W. (1994). Law and English Railway Capitalism 1825–1875. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leka, S., Jain, A., Hollis, D., Andreou, N., & Zwetsloot, G. (2012). The Changing Landscape of OSH Regulation in the UK: A Review. Leicester: IOSH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, R. (2004). The Politics of Work: Feminism, Professionalisation and Women Inspectors of Factories and Workshops. Women’s History Review, 13(2), 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R. (2005). Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. London: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonagh, O. (1958). The Nineteenth Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal. Historical Journal, 1(1), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, R. M. (1967). Law, Medicine and Public Opinion: The Resistance to Compulsory Health Legislation, 1870–1907. Public Law, 107–128, 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, A. (1997). State Intervention and Work Intensification. The Politics of Occupational Health and Safety in the British Cotton Industry, c. 1880–1914. In A. Knotter, B. Altena & D. Damsma (Eds.), Labour, Social Policy and the Welfare State (pp. 125–139). Amsterdam: Aksant Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, A. (2001). A History of Work in Britain, 1880–1950. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, A. (2013). Working Lives: Work in Britain Since 1945. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I., & Johnes, M. (2000). Aberfan: Government and Disasters. Cardiff: Welsh Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuaid, J. (2007). A Historical Perspective on Tolerability of Risk. In F. Bouder, D. Slavin, & R. Löfstedt (Eds.),The Tolerability of Risk: A New Framework for Risk Management (pp. 87–92). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melling, J. (2003). The Risks of Working and the Risks of Not Working: Trade Unions, Employers and Responses to the Risk of Occupational Illness in British industry, c. 1890–1940s (LSE Discussion Paper 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melling, J. (2014). Making Sense of Workplace Fear: The Role of Physicians, Psychiatrists, and Labor in Reframing Occupational Strain in Industrial Britain, c. 1850–1970. In D. Cantor & E. Ramsden (Eds.), Stress, Shock and Adaptation in the Twentieth Century (pp. 189–221). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mess, H. A. (1926). Factory Legislation and Its Administration 1891–1924. London: P. S. King & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (2010). Regulating Health and Safety in the British Mining Industries, 1800-1914. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (1988). British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardinelli, C. (1980). Child Labor and the Factory Acts. The Journal of Economic History, 40(4), 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. (1997). The Sociology of Industrial Injury. London: Mansell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantti, M. K., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2011). “Not an act of God”: Anger and Citizenship in Press Coverage of British Man-made Disasters. Media, Culture and Society, 33, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, J. (2007). The Evolution of Occupational Health and Safety Law on the UK Continental Shelf, 1964–2006. Northern Scotland, 27, 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (1990). Ideology, Hegemony, and Empiricism. British Journal of Criminology, 30(4), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D., & Porter, R. (1988). The Politics of Prevention: Anti-Vaccinationism and Public Health in Nineteenth-Century England. Medical History, 32, 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, K. (1993). Women of Steel: Health and Safety Issues During World War Two. North East Labour History Bulletin, 27, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimington, J. (2008, October 9). Health and Safety—Past, Present and Future. Alan St. John Holt Memorial Lecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (1960). Victorian Origins of the British Welfare State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (2007). Women’s War Work in the North East Shipbuilding Industry. North East History, 38, 67–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H., Beaussier, A., Borraz, O., Bouder, F., Demeritt, D., de Haan, M., et al. (2015). When ‘Must’ Means ‘Maybe’: Varieties of Risk Regulation and the Problem of Trade-offs in Europe. HowSAFE WP, 15(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (1981). Inspectorates in British Government: Law Enforcement and Standards of Efficiency. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirrs, C. (2016a). Risk, Responsibility and Robens: The Transformation of the British System of Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, 1961–1974. In T. Crook & M. Esbester (Eds.), Governing Risks in Modern Britain: Danger, Safety and Accidents, c. 1800–2000 (pp. 249–276). Palgrave: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirrs, C. (2016b). Health and Safety in the British Regulatory State, 1961–2001: The HSC, HSE and the Management of Occupational Risk (Unpublished PhD thesis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangleman, T. (2011). Writing Workers: Re-Reading Workplace Autobiography. Scottish Labour History, 46, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swuste, P., Gulijk, C., & Zwaard, W. (2010). Safety Metaphors and Theories: A Review of the Occupational Safety Literature of the US, UK, and the Netherlands, Till the First Part of the 20th Century. Safety Science, 48(8), 1000–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2010). A Deadly Consensus: Worker Safety and Regulatory Degradation under New Labour. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, E. (1995). And Defeat Goes On: An Assessment of Third-Wave Health and Safety Regulation. In F. Pearce & L. Snider (Eds.), Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates (pp. 245–267). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedale, G. (2000). Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner & Newall and the Asbestos Hazard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedale, G., & Hansen, P. (1998) ‘Protecting the Workers: The Medical Board and the Asbestos Industry, 1930s–1960s’. Medical History, 42(4), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2012). The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. (2011). “Danger Was Something You Were Brought Up Wi’”: Workers’ Narratives on Occupational Health and Safety in the Workplace. Scottish Labour History, 46, 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowitz, J. (1980). Prostitution and Victorian Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D. (1996). Health and Safety Strategies in Europe. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 9(5), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. T. (1962). The Factory Movement 1830–1855. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. (2001). Corporations and Criminal Responsibility (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. L. (1960). Accidents and Ill-Health at Work. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. K. (1983). The Politics of Safety and Health: Occupational Safety and Health in the United States and Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, C. (Ed.). (1996). A History of British Industrial Relations. Vol. III 1939–1979. Brighton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarmie, A. H. (1984). British Employers’ Resistance to “Grandmotherly” Government, 1850–80. Social History, 9(2), 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Almond .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Almond, P., Esbester, M. (2019). Shaping Health and Safety, 1800–2015. In: Health and Safety in Contemporary Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03970-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03970-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03969-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03970-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics