Advertisement

Introduction and Organising Ideas

  • Paul Almond
  • Mike Esbester
Chapter

Abstract

This introductory chapter sets out the core aims and research questions that have motivated the investigation that forms the basis of this book. The contemporary social context and climate that surrounds health and safety, as a social institution, is introduced and analysed, and attention is focused in particular onto the question of how far the broader public and social acceptance of health and safety has changed in the period since 1960, and what might have motivated or driven this change. The chapter seeks to provide a core definition of the concepts of legitimacy, health and safety, and the state, which underpin this research question, and explains the research methodology and the historical focus that are adopted throughout the rest of the book.

References

Primary Sources

  1. Business Taskforce. (2013). Cut EU Red Tape: Report from the Business Taskforce. London: HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249969/TaskForce-report-15-October.pdf.
  2. Cabinet Office. (2011). Red-Tape Challenge. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150522175321/http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/home/index/.
  3. HSE. (2006, April 13). Sensible Risk Management (HSE Board Paper HSE/06/46).Google Scholar
  4. HSE. (2012a). Health and Safety Executive Annual Statistics Report. London: HSE. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/overall/hssh1112.pdf).
  5. HSE. (2012b). Myth Busters Challenge Panel. http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/myth-busting/index.htm.
  6. HSE. (2013). Historical Picture: Trends in Work-Related Injuries and Ill Health Since the Introduction of the Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA) 1974. London: HSE. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/history/historical-picture.pdf).
  7. Grayling, C. (2011, December 18). ‘Elf and Safety Myths’ Targeted. Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/10000844.
  8. Löfstedt, R. (2011). Reclaiming Health and Safety for All: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation [The Löfstedt Review]. London: Crown.Google Scholar
  9. Young, L. (2010). Common Sense, Common Safety [The Young Review]. London: Crown.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Almond, P. (2006). An Inspector’s-Eye View: The Prospective Enforcement of Work-Related Fatality Cases. British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 893–916.Google Scholar
  2. Almond, P. (2007). Regulation Crisis: Evaluating the Potential Legitimizing Effects of ‘Corporate Manslaughter’ Cases. Law and Policy, 29(3), 285–310.Google Scholar
  3. Almond, P. (2009). The Dangers of Hanging Baskets: Regulatory Myths’ and Media Representations of Health and Safety Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(3), 352–375.Google Scholar
  4. Almond, P. (2013). Corporate Manslaughter and Regulatory Reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Almond, P. (2015). Revolution Blues: The Reconstruction of Health and Safety Law as ‘Common-Sense’ Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 42(2), 202–229.Google Scholar
  6. Almond, P., & Gray, G. C. (2017). Frontline Safety: Understanding the Workplace as a Site of Regulatory Engagement. Law & Policy, 39(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, R. (1987). Health and Safety at Work: Consensus and Self-Regulation. In R. Baldwin & C. McCrudden (Eds.), Regulation and Public Law (pp. 132–158). London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  8. Baldwin, R. (1995). Rules and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Balleisen, E. J., & Brake, E. K. (2014). Historical Perspective and Better Regulatory Governance: An Agenda for Institutional Reform. Regulation & Governance, 8(2), 222–245.Google Scholar
  11. Bartle, I., & Vass, P. (2007). Self-Regulation Within the Regulatory State: Towards a New Regulatory Paradigm? Public Administration, 85(4), 885–905.Google Scholar
  12. Bartrip, P. (1982). British Government Inspection, 1832–1875: Some Observations. Historical Journal, 25(3), 605–626.Google Scholar
  13. Bartrip, P., & Fenn, P. T. (1983). The Evolution of Regulatory Style in the Nineteenth Century British Factory Inspectorate. Journal of Law and Society, 10(2), 201–222.Google Scholar
  14. Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimacy of Power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power and Prestige Orders. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 379–405.Google Scholar
  16. Berridge, V. (2010). Thinking in Time: Does Health Policy Need History as Evidence? The Lancet, 375(9717), 798–799.Google Scholar
  17. Black, J. (2000). Proceduralizing Regulation: Part I. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20(4), 597–614.Google Scholar
  18. Black, J. (2007). Tensions in the Regulatory State, Public Law. 58–73.Google Scholar
  19. Black, J. (2008). Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.Google Scholar
  20. Bronstein, J. (2008). Caught in the Machinery: Workplace Accidents and Injured Workers in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Carson, W. G. (1979). The Conventionalisation of Early Factory Crime. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
  22. Cox, P. (2013). The Future Uses of History. History Workshop Journal, 75(1), 125–145.Google Scholar
  23. Dawson, S., Willman, P., Clinton, A., & Bamford, M. (1988). Safety at Work: The Limits of Self-Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Divall, C., Hines, J., & Pooley, C. G. (Eds.). (2015). Transport Policy: Learning Lessons from History. Farnham: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. C. (1995). The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 459–489.Google Scholar
  26. Genn, H. (1993). Business Responses to the Regulation of Health and Safety in England. Law and Policy, 15(3), 219–233.Google Scholar
  27. Green, J. (1997). Risk and Misfortune: The Social Construction of Accidents. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  28. Green, D. (2006). Public Opinion Versus Public Judgement About Crime: Correcting the ‘Comedy of Errors’. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 131–155.Google Scholar
  29. Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective. Law & Policy, 19(4), 363–414.Google Scholar
  30. Gunningham, N., & Johnstone, R. (1999). Regulating Workplace Safety: Systems and Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gunningham, N., Kagan, R., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–341.Google Scholar
  32. Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizitat und Geltung (Between Facts and Norms) (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hawkins, K. (2002). Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. History & Policy. (2018). http://www.historyandpolicy.org.
  36. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  37. Huising, R., & Silbey, S. S. (2011). Governing the Gap: Forging Safe Science Through Relational Regulation. Regulation & Governance, 5(1), 14–42.Google Scholar
  38. Hutter, B. (1989). Variations in Regulatory Enforcement Styles. Law & Policy, 11(2), 153–174.Google Scholar
  39. Hutter, B. (1997). Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hutter, B., & Manning, P. (1990). The Contexts of Regulation: The Impacts Upon Health and Safety Inspectorates in Britain. Law and Policy, 12(2), 103–136.Google Scholar
  41. Jain, A., & Leka, S. (2016). Occupational Health and Safety Legitimacy in the UK: A Review of Quantitative Data. Leicester: IOSH.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Legitimacy as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 53–78.Google Scholar
  43. Kica, E., & Bowman, D. (2012). Regulation by Means of Standardization: Key Legitimacy Issues of Health and Safety Nanotechnology Standards. Jurimetrics, 53(1), 11–56.Google Scholar
  44. Kidd, A. (1999). State, Society and the Poor in Nineteenth-Century England. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Kidd, P., & Parshall, M. (2000). Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 293–308.Google Scholar
  46. Kitzinger, J. (1994). The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction Between Research Participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16(1), 103–121.Google Scholar
  47. Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2009). Focus Groups (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Löfstedt, R. (2005). Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  49. Long, V. (2011). The Rise and Fall of the Healthy Factory: The Politics of Industrial Health in Britain, 1914–1960. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Lord Robens. (1972). Safety and Health at Work: Report of the Committee 1970–1972 (The Robens Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  51. MacDonagh, O. (1958). The Nineteenth Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal. Historical Journal, 1(1), 52–67.Google Scholar
  52. Mess, H. A. (1926). Factory Legislation and Its Administration 1891–1924. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure and Myth and Ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mills, C. (2010). Regulating Health and Safety in the British Mining Industries, 1800–1914. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Moran, M. (2003). The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Murphy, K., Tyler, T., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of the Law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  57. Norrie, A. (2001). Crime, Reason, and History (2nd ed.). Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  58. O’Rourke, D. (2003). Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring. Policy Studies Journal, 31(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  59. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.Google Scholar
  60. Powell, M. A. (Ed.). (2007). Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare. Bristol: University of Bristol Press.Google Scholar
  61. Prosser, T. (1999). Theorising Utility Regulation. The Modern Law Review, 62(2), 196–217.Google Scholar
  62. Prosser, T. (2010). The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Selznick, P. (1985). Focusing Organisational Research on Regulation. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences (pp. 363–367). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sirrs, C. (2016). Risk, Responsibility and Robens: The Transformation of the British System of Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, 1961–1974. In T. Crook & M. Esbester (Eds.), Governing Risks in Modern Britain: Danger, Safety and Accidents, c. 1800–2000 (pp. 249–276). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  66. Smismans, S. (2017). Risk Regulation at Risk: Brexit, Trump It, Risk It. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(1), 33–42.Google Scholar
  67. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  68. Thomas, M. W. (1948). The Early Factory Legislation: A Study in Legislative and Administrative Evolution. Leigh-on-Sea: Thames Bank.Google Scholar
  69. Thornton, D., Gunningham, N., & Kagan, R. A. (2005). General Deterrence and Corporate Environmental Behavior. Law and Policy, 27(2), 262–288.Google Scholar
  70. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2010). A Deadly Consensus: Worker Safety and Regulatory Degradation Under New Labour. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 46–65.Google Scholar
  71. Tucker, E. (1995). And Defeat Goes On: An Assessment of Third-Wave Health and Safety Regulation. In F. Pearce & L. Snider (Eds.), Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates (pp. 245–267). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  72. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Tyler, T. R. (2011). The Psychology of Self-Regulation: Normative Motivations for Compliance. In C. Parker & V. L. Nielsen (Eds.), Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation (pp. 78–102). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  74. Walters, D. (1996). Health and Safety Strategies in Europe. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 9(5), 297–308.Google Scholar
  75. Ward, J. T. (1962). The Factory Movement 1830–1855. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Weber, M. (1914). Economy and Society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wenzel, M., & Jobling, P. (2006). Legitimacy of Regulatory Authorities as a Function of Inclusive Identification and Power Over Ingroups and Outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 239–258.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.School of Area Studies, History, Politics and LiteratureUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations