Introduction and Organising Ideas
This introductory chapter sets out the core aims and research questions that have motivated the investigation that forms the basis of this book. The contemporary social context and climate that surrounds health and safety, as a social institution, is introduced and analysed, and attention is focused in particular onto the question of how far the broader public and social acceptance of health and safety has changed in the period since 1960, and what might have motivated or driven this change. The chapter seeks to provide a core definition of the concepts of legitimacy, health and safety, and the state, which underpin this research question, and explains the research methodology and the historical focus that are adopted throughout the rest of the book.
- Business Taskforce. (2013). Cut EU Red Tape: Report from the Business Taskforce. London: HM Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249969/TaskForce-report-15-October.pdf.
- Cabinet Office. (2011). Red-Tape Challenge. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150522175321/http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/home/index/.
- HSE. (2006, April 13). Sensible Risk Management (HSE Board Paper HSE/06/46).Google Scholar
- HSE. (2012a). Health and Safety Executive Annual Statistics Report. London: HSE. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/overall/hssh1112.pdf).
- HSE. (2012b). Myth Busters Challenge Panel. http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/myth-busting/index.htm.
- HSE. (2013). Historical Picture: Trends in Work-Related Injuries and Ill Health Since the Introduction of the Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA) 1974. London: HSE. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/history/historical-picture.pdf).
- Grayling, C. (2011, December 18). ‘Elf and Safety Myths’ Targeted. Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/feedarticle/10000844.
- Löfstedt, R. (2011). Reclaiming Health and Safety for All: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation [The Löfstedt Review]. London: Crown.Google Scholar
- Young, L. (2010). Common Sense, Common Safety [The Young Review]. London: Crown.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. (1987). Health and Safety at Work: Consensus and Self-Regulation. In R. Baldwin & C. McCrudden (Eds.), Regulation and Public Law (pp. 132–158). London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. (1995). Rules and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Black, J. (2007). Tensions in the Regulatory State, Public Law. 58–73.Google Scholar
- Bronstein, J. (2008). Caught in the Machinery: Workplace Accidents and Injured Workers in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carson, W. G. (1979). The Conventionalisation of Early Factory Crime. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
- Dawson, S., Willman, P., Clinton, A., & Bamford, M. (1988). Safety at Work: The Limits of Self-Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Divall, C., Hines, J., & Pooley, C. G. (Eds.). (2015). Transport Policy: Learning Lessons from History. Farnham: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Green, J. (1997). Risk and Misfortune: The Social Construction of Accidents. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
- Gunningham, N., & Johnstone, R. (1999). Regulating Workplace Safety: Systems and Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizitat und Geltung (Between Facts and Norms) (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, K. (2002). Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- History & Policy. (2018). http://www.historyandpolicy.org.
- Hutter, B. (1997). Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Jain, A., & Leka, S. (2016). Occupational Health and Safety Legitimacy in the UK: A Review of Quantitative Data. Leicester: IOSH.Google Scholar
- Kica, E., & Bowman, D. (2012). Regulation by Means of Standardization: Key Legitimacy Issues of Health and Safety Nanotechnology Standards. Jurimetrics, 53(1), 11–56.Google Scholar
- Kidd, A. (1999). State, Society and the Poor in Nineteenth-Century England. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2009). Focus Groups (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lord Robens. (1972). Safety and Health at Work: Report of the Committee 1970–1972 (The Robens Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Mess, H. A. (1926). Factory Legislation and Its Administration 1891–1924. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure and Myth and Ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mills, C. (2010). Regulating Health and Safety in the British Mining Industries, 1800–1914. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Norrie, A. (2001). Crime, Reason, and History (2nd ed.). Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
- Powell, M. A. (Ed.). (2007). Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare. Bristol: University of Bristol Press.Google Scholar
- Selznick, P. (1985). Focusing Organisational Research on Regulation. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences (pp. 363–367). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Sirrs, C. (2016). Risk, Responsibility and Robens: The Transformation of the British System of Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, 1961–1974. In T. Crook & M. Esbester (Eds.), Governing Risks in Modern Britain: Danger, Safety and Accidents, c. 1800–2000 (pp. 249–276). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Thomas, M. W. (1948). The Early Factory Legislation: A Study in Legislative and Administrative Evolution. Leigh-on-Sea: Thames Bank.Google Scholar
- Tucker, E. (1995). And Defeat Goes On: An Assessment of Third-Wave Health and Safety Regulation. In F. Pearce & L. Snider (Eds.), Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates (pp. 245–267). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (2011). The Psychology of Self-Regulation: Normative Motivations for Compliance. In C. Parker & V. L. Nielsen (Eds.), Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation (pp. 78–102). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1914). Economy and Society (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar