Advertisement

Conclusion: Contributions, Recommendations and Future Research Areas

  • Oluwafemi AdeagboEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Sociology book series (BRIEFSSOCY)

Abstract

The research that led to the birth of this book was motivated by the need to explore and build insights into an under-researched area in family studies (particularly in Africa), viz. gay intimate unions and the construction and dynamics of gay households and familial relations. Given South Africa’s racist past and the challenges of its democratic, non-racial, non-sexist democratic present, this book established how interracial gay partners engage in decision-making, negotiations, and work through the division of labour in their current partnerships. A study of this nature has not been conducted before in South Africa, and as such the research fills a gap and invites new research in this field. Through the review of the literature, current discourses on gay partnerships in post-apartheid South Africa and elsewhere have been identified. The inconsistencies in these discussions reveal the complexities shaping discourses on race, sexuality and class in same-sex intimate relationships. The question of racial identity and ‘personal resources’ and how they influence the relationship is addressed in this book, as well as the way resilience strategies are drawn upon to sustain and keep intact the partnership. This chapter gives an overview of the book, a summary of the findings on gay partnerships, the theoretical contributions as well as recommendations and future research areas.

Keywords

Theorising gender Gay research Race Sexuality Class 

References

  1. Badgett, M. V. (2011). Social inclusion and the value of marriage equality in Massachusetts and the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baiocco, R., Argalia, M., & Laghi, F. (2014). The desire to marry and attitudes toward same-sex family legalization in a sample of Italian lesbians and gay men. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balsam, K. F., Beauchaine, T. P., Rothblum, E. D., & Solomon, S. E. (2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chesters, J. (2012). Gender attitudes and housework: Trends over time in Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 511–526.Google Scholar
  5. Eskridge, W. N. (2011). Six myths that confuse the marriage equality debate. Valparaiso University Law Review, 46, 103.Google Scholar
  6. Makofane, K. (2013). Unspoken facts: A history of homosexualities in Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 15, 114–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mays, V. M., Cochran, S. D., & Rhue, S. (1993). The impact of perceived discriminitation on the intimate relationships of black lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 25, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McAllister, J. (2013). Tswanarising global gayness: The ‘unAfrican’argument, Western gay media imagery, local responses and gay culture in Botswana. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 15, 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McHugh, M. C. (2005). Understanding gender and intimate partner abuse. Sex Roles, 52, 717–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Naidoo, K., Smit, R., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2012). Gender politics and work-family integration: Persisting exclusions at two South African universities. In T. Uys & S. Patel (Eds.), Exclusion, social capital and citizenship: Contested transitions in South Africa and India. New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.Google Scholar
  11. Otis, M. D., Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D., & Hamrin, R. (2006). Stress and relationship quality in same-sex couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Öun, I. (2013). Is it fair to share? Perceptions of fairness in the division of housework among couples in 22 countries. Social Justice Research, 26, 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramais, C. M. (2010). Til death do you part… and this time we mean it: Denial of access to divorce for same-sex couples. University of Illinois Law Review, p. 1013.Google Scholar
  14. Sonnekus, T. (2013). ‘We’re not Faggots!’: Masculinity, homosexuality and the representation of Afrikaner men who have sex with men in the film Skoonheid and online. South African Review of Sociology, 44, 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. StatsSA, Statistics South Africa. (2010). Marriages and divorces report. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa. Google Scholar
  16. Van Zyl, M. (2011). Are same-sex marriages UnAfrican? Same-sex relationships and belonging in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Faculty of HumanitiesUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations