Advertisement

Diversity in Families

  • Oluwafemi Adeagbo
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Sociology book series (BRIEFSSOCY)

Abstract

This chapter engages with the traditional and modern concept of ‘family’ and ‘masculinity’. It explores gender roles and gender relations in both same-sex and heterosexual intimate relationships. It also gives a brief description about the interracial gay partners that participated in the research and add nuance to the understanding of readers about the background, demographics information, relationship formation and general experience of the participants.

Keywords

Families Masculinity Interracial relationships Gay family Gender 

References

  1. Acock, A. C., & Demo, D. H. (1994). Family diversity and well-being. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Adeagbo, O. (2016). ‘Love beyond colour’: The formation of interracial gay men’s intimate relationships in post-apartheid South Africa. National Identities, 18, 241–264.Google Scholar
  3. Adeagbo, O. A. (2015). Gay men, intimacy and family life: Exploring interracial same-sex unions in Johannesburg. University of Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  4. Adeagbo, O. A. (2018). Are same-sex relationships anti-family? Investigating relationship stability among interracial gay partners in South Africa. Journal of Gender Studies, 27, 165–176.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, K. R., & Demo, D. H. (1995). The families of lesbians and gay men: A new frontier in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 111–127.Google Scholar
  6. Amoateng, A. Y., & Heaton, T. B. (2012). Racial differences in attitudes towards selected aspects of family life in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Demography, 13, 37–58.Google Scholar
  7. Baxter, J. (1992). Power attitudes and time: The domestic division of labour. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 165–182.Google Scholar
  8. Baxter, J. (2002). Patterns of change and stability in the gender division of household labour in Australia, 1986–1997. Journal of Sociology, 38, 399–424.Google Scholar
  9. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Western, M. (2005). Post-familial families and the domestic division of labour. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 583–600.Google Scholar
  10. Beck-Gernsheim, E., & Beck, U. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Berkowitz, D. (2008). A sociohistorical analysis of gay men’s procreative consciousness. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 3, 157–190.Google Scholar
  13. Biblarz, T. J., & Savci, E. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 480–497.Google Scholar
  14. Braun, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., & Baumgärtner, M. K. (2008). Perceived equity in the gendered division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1145–1156.Google Scholar
  15. Bristow, J. (1996). Homophobia. In M. Payne (Ed.), A dictionary of cultural and critical theory (p. 335). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Budgeon, S., & Roseneil, S. (2004). Editors’ introduction: Beyond the conventional family. Current Sociology, 52, 127–134.Google Scholar
  17. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  18. Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Change and continuity in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Cheal, D. J. (1991). Family and the state of theory. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Chesters, J. (2012). Gender attitudes and housework: Trends over time in Australia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 511–526.Google Scholar
  22. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1208–1233.Google Scholar
  23. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Connell, R. W. (2000). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities. Clark Lecture, University of Kansas Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  25. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis in two waves. Work, Employment and Society, 19, 213–233.Google Scholar
  27. Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037–1061.Google Scholar
  28. Da, W.-W. (2004). A regional tradition of gender equity: Shanghai men in Sydney, Australia. Journal of Men’s Studies, 12, 133–149.Google Scholar
  29. Edwards, R., McCarthy, J. R., & Gillies, V. (2012). The politics of concepts: Family and its (putative) replacements. British Journal of Sociology, 63, 730–746.Google Scholar
  30. Forste, R., & Kiira, F. (2012). Household labor, gender roles, and family satisfaction: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 613–631.Google Scholar
  31. Fox, B. (2009). When couples become parents: The creation of gender in the transition to parenthood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.Google Scholar
  33. Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and intimacy in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world-how globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  36. Goldberg, A. E. (2013). “Doing” and “Undoing” gender: The meaning and division of housework in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 5, 85–104.Google Scholar
  37. Goldberg, A. E., Smith, J. Z., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2012). The division of labor in lesbian, gay, and heterosexual new adoptive parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 812–828.Google Scholar
  38. Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5, 49–72.Google Scholar
  40. Henderson, N., & Shefer, T. (2008). Practices of power and abuse in gay male relationships: An exploratory case study of a young, Isixhosa-speaking man in the Western Cape. South African Journal of Psychology, 38, 1–20.Google Scholar
  41. Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, P. (2004). Haunting heterosexuality: The homo/het binary and intimate love. Sexualities, 7, 183–200.Google Scholar
  43. Kurdek, L. A. (1993). The allocation of household labor in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual married couples. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 127–139.Google Scholar
  44. Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 132–148.Google Scholar
  45. Lau, C. Q. (2012). The stability of same-sex cohabitation, different-sex cohabitation, and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 973–988.Google Scholar
  46. Lubbe, C. (2007). Mothers, fathers or parents: Same-gendered families in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 260–283.Google Scholar
  47. Mintz, S. (1998). From patriarchy to androgyny and other myths: Placing men’s family roles in historical perspective. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum.Google Scholar
  48. Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Naidoo, K., Smit, R., & Seedat-Khan, M. (2012). Gender politics and work-family integration: Persisting exclusions at two South African universities. In T. Uys, S. Patel (Eds.), Exclusion, social capital and citizenship: Contested transitions in South Africa and India. New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.Google Scholar
  50. Öun, I. (2013). Is it fair to share? Perceptions of fairness in the division of housework among couples in 22 countries. Social Justice Research, 26, 400–421.Google Scholar
  51. Perlesz, A., Power, J., Brown, R., McNair, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., et al. (2010). Organising work and home in same-sex parented families: Findings from the work love play study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 374–391.Google Scholar
  52. Pitt, R. N., & Borland, E. (2009). Bachelorhood and men’s attitudes about gender roles. Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 140–158.Google Scholar
  53. Press, J. E., & Townsley, E. (1998). Wives’ and husbands’ housework reporting: Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender and Society, 12, 188–218.Google Scholar
  54. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society, 18, 429–450.Google Scholar
  55. Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523–547.Google Scholar
  56. Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65, 816–833.Google Scholar
  57. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.Google Scholar
  58. Shieh, W.-Y. (2010). Gay and lesbian couple relationship commitment in Taiwan: A preliminary study. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 1334–1354.Google Scholar
  59. Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  60. Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: Same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52, 561–575.Google Scholar
  61. Stacey, J. (1998). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late-twentieth-century America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sullivan, O. (2011). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 3, 1–13.Google Scholar
  63. Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.Google Scholar
  64. Weeks, J. (2007). The world we have won: The remaking of erotic and intimate life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.Google Scholar
  66. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender and Society, 23, 112–122.Google Scholar
  67. Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gay men and kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wong, D. (2012). Doing gender, doing culture: Division of domestic labour among lesbians in Hong Kong. In Women’s studies international forum (pp. 266–75). Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Faculty of HumanitiesUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations