Advertisement

What is Affecting Customers’ Intention to Perform Social Media Marketing Activities in the Hotel Industry?

  • Anastasios-Ioannis Theocharidis
  • George Karavasilis
  • Vasiliki VranaEmail author
  • Evangelos Kehris
  • Konstantinos Antoniadis
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Social media marketing is a connection between brands and consumers, offering a personal channel for user centered networking and social interaction. The research employs constructs adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model, integrates them with other constructs and investigates factors affecting Greek consumers’ acceptance of social media marketing in the hotel industry. The conceptual model is tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis. The study identifies six factors that directly or indirectly influence intention to perform Social Media Marketing Activities. These factors are: Perceived ease of use, Perceived usefulness, Permission Based Acceptance, Fear about social media marketing, Social media Use, and Attitudes towards marketing with social media. The model raises fundamental issues that hotel managers, decision-makers and social media specialists should take into account to increase customers’ intention to perform social media marketing activities, like booking, using social media applications.

Keywords

Digital marketing Social media marketing Consumer’s acceptance Structural equation modeling 

JEL Classification

M31 Z32 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the M.B.A. in Hospitality and Tourism for financial support.

References

  1. Abbott, E. (2017). The future of social media: 32 experts share their 2018 predictions. Retrieved March 6, 2018 from https://www.business2community.com/social-media/future-social-media-32-experts-share-2018-predictions-01973207.
  2. Akar, E., & Topçu, B. (2011). An examination of the factors influencing consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
  3. Alsaghier, H., Ford, M., Nguyen, A., & Hexel, R. (2009). Conceptualizing Citizen’s Trust in e-Government: Application of Q methodology. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7, 295–310.Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1990). Trying to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 127–140.Google Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.Google Scholar
  6. Bigcommerce. (2017). What is ‘following’ and what does it mean on social media? Retrieved March 6, 2018 from https://www.bigcommerce.com/ecommerce-answers/what-is-following/.
  7. Blomfield-Neira, C., & Barber, B. (2014). Social networking site use: Linked to adolescents’ social self-concept, self-esteem, and depressed mood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66, 56–64.Google Scholar
  8. Bwala, K. J., & Mutula, S. (2014). E-Government: Implementation, Adoption and Synthesis in Developing Countries. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.Google Scholar
  9. Cha, J. (2009). Shopping on social networking websites: Attitudes towards real versus virtual items. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10, 77–93.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, X., Fu, S., & de Vreede, G.-J. (2017). Understanding trust influencing factors in social media communication: A qualitative study. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 25–35.Google Scholar
  11. Chiou, Y.H., Chen, M.H.. Huang, L.H., Huang, L.R., & Hu. S.R. (2008). The effects of blog product placement type and source credibility on the attitudes toward product placement in Taiwan. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business and Information (BAI2008).Google Scholar
  12. Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., et al. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674–1684.Google Scholar
  13. Colesca, S. E. (2009). Increasing e-trust: A solution to minimize risk in the e-government adoption. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 4(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, F. (1980). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13, 318–341.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.Google Scholar
  16. DMR. (2017a). 400 Interesting Twitter facts. Demographics and statistics (November 2017). Retrieved December 29, 2017 from: https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/march-2013-by-the-numbers-a-few-amazing-twitter-stats/.
  17. DMR. (2017b). Instagram user statistics. Retrieved December 29, 2017 from https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/important-instagram-stats/.
  18. Do-Hyung, E., Jumin, L., & Ingoo, H. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148.Google Scholar
  19. Finch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Latent Variable Modeling with R. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unbearable and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  21. Gao, T., Rohm, A., Sultan, F., & Pagani, M. (2013). Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers’ mobile marketing acceptance. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2536–2544.Google Scholar
  22. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.Google Scholar
  23. Gillin, P. (2007). The new influencers: A marketer’s guide to the new social media. Sanger, CA: Quill Driver Books.Google Scholar
  24. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2012). Structural equation modeling: A second course (Vol. 2). Charlotte: IAP.Google Scholar
  26. Heinonen, K. (2011). Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers’ social media behavior. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10, 356–364.Google Scholar
  27. Hootsuite. (2017). A Long List of Facebook Statistics—And What They Mean For Your Business. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from https://blog.hootsuite.com/facebook-statistics/.
  28. Jayawardhena, C., Kuckertz, A., Karjaluoto, H., & Kautonen, T. (2009). Antecedents to permission based mobile marketing: an initial examination. European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 473–499.Google Scholar
  29. Karavasilis, I., Vrana, V., & Zafiropoulos, K. (2016). An extended model of e-government adoption by civil servants in Greece. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 12(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  30. Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2010). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1480–1486.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, U. A., & Ahmad, M. (2013). Trust, distrust and lack of confidence of users in online social media-sharing communities. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, 438–450.Google Scholar
  32. Kobsa, A. (2007). Privacy-enhanced personalization. Communication of the ACM, 30(8), 24–33.Google Scholar
  33. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Lampe, C., Ellison, N.B., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. In: CSCW’08 (pp. 721–730), November 8–12, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Liang, T. P., Chen, C. Y., Du, T., Turban, E., & Li, Y. (2012). Effect of personalization on the perceived usefulness of online customer services: a dual-core theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4), 275–288.Google Scholar
  36. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355.Google Scholar
  37. Mangold, G., & Faulds, D. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52, 357–365.Google Scholar
  38. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.Google Scholar
  39. O’Cass, Α., & Carlson, J. (2012). An e-retailing assessment of perceived website-service innovativeness: Implications for website quality evaluations, trust. Australasian Marketing Journal, 20, 28–36.Google Scholar
  40. Paquette, H. (2013). Social media as a marketing tool: a literature review. Major Papers by Master of Science Students, Paper 2. Retrieved October 31, 2017 from http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/tmd_major_papers/2.
  41. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 69–103.Google Scholar
  42. Pawar, A.V. (2014). Study of the effectiveness of online marketing on integrated marketing communication (Master Thesis, D.Y. Patil University).Google Scholar
  43. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.Google Scholar
  44. Rowe, W.D. (1977). An anatomy of risk. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Safko, L., & Brake, D. K. (2009). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Management Decision, 50(2), 253–272.Google Scholar
  47. Statista. (2017a). Mobile Internet & Apps. Statistics and Market Data on Mobile Internet & Apps. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from https://www.statista.com/markets/424/topic/538/mobile-internet-apps/.
  48. Statista. (2017b). Social Media & User-Generated Content. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from: https://www.statista.com/markets/424/topic/540/social-media-user-generated-content/.
  49. Stephen, A. (2015). The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behavior (Master Thesis, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
  50. Suksa-ngiam, W., & Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2015). The adoption of social media by Thai university students: Multiple group moderating effects’. Information Development, 31(1), 69–82.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, D., Strutton, D., & Thompson, K. (2012). Self-enhancement as a motivation for sharing online advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12, 13–28.Google Scholar
  52. Teo, T., Srivastava, S., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–131.Google Scholar
  53. VanMeter, R., Grisaffe, D., & Chonko, L. (2015). Of “likes” and “pins”: The effects of consumers’ attachment to social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 32, 70–88.Google Scholar
  54. Visser, P. S., & Krosnick, J. A. (1998). Development of attitude strength over the lifecycle: Surge and decline. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1389–1410.Google Scholar
  55. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of eGovernment by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162.Google Scholar
  56. Wired. (2009). Fighting the fear of social media. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.wired.com/2009/09/social-media-fighting-the-fear/.
  57. YouTube. (2017). YouTube statistics – 2017. facts and numbers. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from https://fortunelords.com/youtube-statistics/.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasios-Ioannis Theocharidis
    • 1
  • George Karavasilis
    • 1
  • Vasiliki Vrana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Evangelos Kehris
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Antoniadis
    • 2
  1. 1.Technological Education Institute of Central MacedoniaSerresGreece
  2. 2.University of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations