Advertisement

Vertical and Horizontal Integration Systems in Industry 4.0

  • Magdiel Pérez-Lara
  • Jania Astrid Saucedo-Martínez
  • Tomás Eloy Salais-Fierro
  • José Antonio Marmolejo-SaucedoEmail author
  • Pandian Vasant
Chapter
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

The industrial and technological growth, sponsored by the new organizational systems generated by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, requires companies to adapt to new ways of managing business. All activities within the organizational and business area can be conceived as a set of operations that are linked to computer systems and information management in the network. As a result of this, a greater efficiency in the flow is accomplished. Moreover, with this new industry and business perception, different analytical tools have to be involved to get the greater efficiency in the consumer service. The objective of this research is to propose a methodological tool and validate it, which assess technological and operational criteria in companies, to place them in a level for the transfer to the new Industrial Revolution, considering the vertical and horizontal integration systems of Industry 4.0.

Keywords

Industry 4.0 Vertical integration Horizontal integration Reliability Validity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for the support provided to the development of this research, as well as the Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León for being the study house to knowledge generation and the Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica (FIME) for the support granted.

References

  1. 1.
    Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., Verl, A.: Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready: holistic approach to the integration of existing production systems in Industry 4.0 environments. Prod. Eng. 9(1), 143–148 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dombrowski, U., Wagner, T.: Mental strain as field of action in the 4th industrial revolution. Proc. CIRP. 17, 100–105 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fielt, E.: Conceptualising business models: definitions, frameworks and classifications. J. Bus. Model. 1(1), 85–105 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, J.: Smart factory systems. Informatik-Spektrum. 38(3), 230–235 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vyas, D., Nijholt, A.: From mundane to smart : exploring interactions with ‘smart’ design objects. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 8(1), 59–82 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-potente, C., Weber, A.R., Prote, J.: Collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the context of Industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP. 19, 51–56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schumacher, A., Erol, S., Sihn, W.: A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP. 52, 161–166 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saucedo-Martínez, J.A., Pérez-Lara, M., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J.A., Salais-Fierro, T.E., Vasant, P.: Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations : a review. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 9(3), 1–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Gilchrist, 13 Introducing Industry 4.0Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toro, C., Barandiaran, I., Posada, J.: A perspective on knowledge based and intelligent systems implementation in industrie 4.0. Procedia Comput. Sci. 60, 362–370 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., Zhang, C.: Towards smart factory for Industry 4.0: a self- organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput. Networks. 0, 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joyce, A., Paquin, R.L.: The triple layered business model canvas: a tool to design more sustainable business models. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 1474–1486 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wainstein, M.E., Bumpus, A.G.: Business models as drivers of the low carbon power system transition: a multi-level perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 572–585 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stock, T., Seliger, G.: Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP. 40, 536–541 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hashemy, S.H., Yousefi, M., Soodi, S., Omidi, B.: Explaining Human resource empowerment pattern and organizational excellence among employees of emergency of Guilan’s University hospitals. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 230, 6–13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smits, C.C.A., Justinussen, J.C.S., Bertelsen, R.G.: Human capital development and a social license to operate: examples from arctic energy development in the Faroe Islands, Iceland and Greenland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 16, 122–131 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pelinescu, E.: The impact of human capital on economic growth. Procedia Econ. Financ. 22, 184–190 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Felicio, J.A., Couto, E., Caiado, J.: Human capital, social capital and organizational performance. Manag. Decis. 52(2), 350–364 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Longo, F., Nicoletti, E., Padovano, A.: Smart operators in industry 4.0 : a human-centered approach to enhance operators ’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput. Ind. Eng. 113, 144–159 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bauer, W., Hämmerle, M., Schlund, S., Vocke, C.: Transforming to a hyper-connected society and economy – towards an “Industry 4.0”. Procedia Manuf. 3, 417–424 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ojha, D., Shockley, J., Acharya, C.: Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 179, 212–227 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Golmoradi, R., Sattari Ardabili, F.: The effects of social capital and leadership styles on organizational learning. Procedia Soc Behav. Sci. 230, 372–378 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferriols, F.J., Mula, J., Díaz-Madroñero, M.: Supply chain management as the company engine in automotive manufacturing. IFAC Proc. Vol. 46(9), 682–687 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bücker, I., Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Towards a methodology for industrie 4.0 transformation, vol. 1, pp. 209–221. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sousa-Zomer, T.T., Cauchick Miguel, P.A.: Sustainable business models as an innovation strategy in the water sector: an empirical investigation of a sustainable product-service system. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dachin, A., Burcea, F.-C.: Evaluations of driving effects of the Automotive Industry in the Romanian Economy – a quantitative analysis. Procedia Econ. Financ. 10(14), 207–216 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderl, R.: Advanced engineering of smart products and smart production abstract. Technol. Innov. Product Development, 19th International Seminar on High Technology, pp. 1–14 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Teixeira, A.A.C., Queirós, A.S.S.: Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Res. Policy. 45(8), 1636–1648 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erbiyik, H., Saru, M.: Six sigma implementations in supply chain: an application for an Automotive Subsidiary Industry in Bursa in Turkey. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 195, 2556–2565 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Toro-Jarrín, M.A., Ponce-Jaramillo, I.E., Güemes-Castorena, D.: Methodology for the of building process integration of Business Model Canvas and Technological Roadmap. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 110, 213–225 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schöggl, J.P., Baumgartner, R.J., Hofer, D.: Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: a checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 1602–1617 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salcito, K., Singer, B.H., Krieger, G.R., Weiss, M.G., Wielga, M., Utzinger, J.: Assessing corporate project impacts in changeable contexts: A human rights perspective. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 47, 36–46 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jung, K., Morris, K.C., Lyons, K.W., Leong, S., Cho, H.: Mapping strategic goals and operational performance metrics for smart manufacturing systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 44, 184–193 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sprock, T., McGinnis, L.F.: A conceptual model for operational control in smart manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 28(3), 1865–1869 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stevens, G.C.: Integrating the supply chain. (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., del Pilar Baptista Lucio, M.: Metodología de la investigación, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, México (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magdiel Pérez-Lara
    • 1
  • Jania Astrid Saucedo-Martínez
    • 1
  • Tomás Eloy Salais-Fierro
    • 1
  • José Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo
    • 2
    Email author
  • Pandian Vasant
    • 3
  1. 1.Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y EléctricaUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ciudad UniversitariaSan Nicolás de los GarzaMexico
  2. 2.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad PanamericanaCiudad de MéxicoMexico
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Teknologi PetronasSeri IskandarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations