Advertisement

Rational Elements (BEZIER, NURBS)

  • Christopher G. ProvatidisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 256)

Abstract

This chapter deals with single macroelements in which the approximation of the variable U is based mostly on rational Bézier and less on nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS). Since univariate rational Bernstein–Bézier polynomials is a special case of univariate NURBS, it becomes obvious that tensor-product rational Bézier is also a specific case of tensor-product NURBS. The major significance of rational elements is that they accurately represent the geometry of conics (circles, ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas). In an instructive way, we focus on the analysis of a circular cavity using a single tensor-product macroelement. It is shown that a single quadratic Bézier macroelement, although is capable of accurately representing the entire circle, it leads to a numerical solution of low quality (slightly worse than the classical nine-node finite element of Lagrangian type). In both cases, this is due to its insufficiency to approximate the eigensolutions (e.g., the eigenvectors in dynamics). Nevertheless, after a sufficient degree elevation which maintains the shape of the circle, it is shown that the higher-order Bézier converges to the exact solution. The presentation continues with a very short summary on the NURBS-based dominating IGA, and the reader is advised for further study.

Keywords

Rational Bézier Circular macroelement MATLAB Freeware software Degree elevation Circular acoustic cavity NURBS issues 

References

  1. 1.
    Auricchio F, Calabrò F, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Sangalli G (2012) A simple algorithm for obtaining nearly optimal quadrature rules for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:15–27MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buffa A, Sangalli G (eds) (2016) Isogeometric analysis: a new paradigm in the numerical approximation of PDEs. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chou JJ (1995) Higher order Bézier circles. Comput Aided Des 27(4):303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen E, Martin T, Kirby RM, Lyche T, Riesenfeld RF (2010) Analysis-aware modeling: understanding quality considerations in modeling for isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:334–356MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cottrell J, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cottrell JA, Reali A, Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric analysis of structural vibrations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5257–5296MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curry HB, Schoenberg IJ (1966) On Pólya frequency functions IV: the fundamental spline functions and their limits. J Anal Math 17(1):71–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Boor C (1972) On calculating with B-splines. J Approximation Theor 6:50–62Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Falco C, Reali A, Vázque R (2011) GeoPDEs: a research tool for isogeometric analysis of PDEs. Adv Eng Softw 42:1020–1034Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Boor C (2001) A practical guide to splines, revised edition. Springer, New York, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Boor C (2000) Spline toolbox for use in MATLAB, user’s guide, version 3. The MathWorks IncGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(39–41):4135–4195MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hughes TJR, Reali A, Sangalli G (2010) Efficient quadrature for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:301–313MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Höllig K (2003) Finite element methods with B-splines. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Höllig K (2002) Finite element approximation with splines. In: Farin G, Hoschek J, Kim MS (eds) Handbook of computer aided geometric design. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Chapter 11, pp 283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanarachos A, Röper O (1979) Rechnerunterstützte netzgenerierung mit hilfe der Coonsschen abbildung. VDI-Z 121:297–303Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karatarakis A, Karakitsios P, Papadrakakis M (2014) GPU accelerated computation of the isogeometric analysis stiffness matrix. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 269:334–355MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nguyen VP, Anitescu C, Bordas SPA, Rabczuk T (2015) Isogeometric analysis: an overview and computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simul 117:89–116MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piegl L, Tiller W (1989) Circles: a menagerie of rational B-splines circles. IEEE Comput Appl 9(5):48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prautzsch H (1984) Degree elevation of B-spline curves. Comput Aided Geom Des 1(1):193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Provatidis CG (2004) On DR/BEM for eigenvalue analysis of 2-D acoustics. Comput Mech 35:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Provatidis CG (2004) Coons-patch macroelements in two-dimensional eigenvalue and scalar wave propagation problems. Comput Struct 82(4–5):383–395MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Provatidis CG (2004) Solution of two-dimensional Poisson problems in quadrilateral domains using transfinite Coons interpolation. Commun Numer Methods Eng 20(7):521–533MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Provatidis CG (2009) Eigenanalysis of two-dimensional acoustic cavities using transfinite interpolation. J Algorithms Comput Technol 3(4):477–502MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Provatidis CG (2006) Coons-patch macroelements in two-dimensional parabolic problems. Appl Math Model 30(4):319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rypl D, Patzák B (2012) Study of computational efficiency of numerical quadrature schemes in the isogeometric analysis. In: Proceedings 18th international conference engineering mechanics 2012, Svratka, Czech Republic, 14–17 May 2012, Paper #304, pp 1135–1143Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schillinger D, Hossain SJ, Hughes TJR (2014) Reduced Bézier element quadrature rules for quadratic and cubic splines in isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 277:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schmidt R, Kiendl J, Bletzinger K-U, Wüchner R (2010) Realization of an integrated structural design process: analysis-suitable geometric modeling and isogeometric analysis. Comput Vis Sci 13:315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vuong A-V, Heinrich Ch, Simeon B (2010) ISOGAT: a 2D tutorial MATLAB code for isogeometric analysis. Comput Aided Geom Des 27:644–655MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Galligo A (2011) Parameterization of computational domain in isogeometric analysis: methods and comparison. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:2021–2031MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Galligo A (2013) Analysis-suitable volume parameterization of multi-block computational domain in isogeometric applications. Comput Aided Des 45:395–404MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Galligo A (2013) Optimal analysis-aware parameterization of computational domain in 3D isogeometric analysis. Comput Aided Des 45:812–821MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu G, Mourrain B, Galligo A, Rabczuk T (2014) High-quality construction of analysis-suitable trivariate NURBS solids by reparameterization methods. Comput Mech 54:1303–1313MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The finite element method, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations