Conclusions for Container Port Security

  • Xufan ZhangEmail author
  • Michael Roe


The aim of this book was to analyse the impacts of the CSI programme on EU container seaport competition. In order to achieve this aim, five objectives were developed in Chapter  1. Research Objectives 1 and 2 and partial Objectives 3 and 4 were addressed in the literature reviews (Chapters  2 and  3) and conceptual model development process (Chapter  4). In order to fully achieve Objectives 3, 4, and 5, a Delphi survey was conducted to collect primary data to test the conceptual model and a further model was developed based on the Delphi findings and secondary data. This chapter will explain each objective in detail.


  1. Banomyong, R. (2005). The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply-chain management. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research A, 39, 75–92.Google Scholar
  3. Congressional Budget Office. (2016). Scanning and Imaging Shipping Containers Overseas: Costs and Alternatives. Available at Accessed 10 March 2017.
  4. Dallimore, C. (2008). Securing the Supply Chain: Does the Container Security Initiative Comply with WTO Law? (Dissertation). University of Muenster. Available at Accessed 30 January 2016.
  5. Dekker, S., & Stevens, H. (2007). Maritime security in the European Union-empirical findings on financial implications for port facilities. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(5), 458–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donner, M., & Kruk, C. (2009). Supply Chain Security Guide. (The World Bank and DFID, 1), pp. 1–107. Available at Accessed 20 April 2016.
  7. Grillot, S. R., & Cruise, R. J. (2016). Protecting Our Ports: Domestic and International Politics of Containerized Freight Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Len, C. (2015). China’s 21st century maritime silk road initiative, energy security and SLOC access. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 11, 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. McCalla, R. (1999). Global change, local pain: Intermodal seaport terminals and their service areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Metaparti, P. (2010). Rhetoric, rationality and reality in post-9/11 maritime security. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(7), 723–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang, J., Ng, A. K. Y., & Olivier, D. (2004). Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalising port management practices. Transport Policy, 11(3), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (1995). Planning and Conducting Needs Assessment: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Yeo, G. T. (2007). Port Competitiveness in North East Asia: An Integrated Fuzzy Approach to Expert Evaluations (PhD thesis). Plymouth University, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Yu, H. (2017). Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiatives and establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(105), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LogisticsBeijing WuZi UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of ManagementPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations