Advertisement

The Paradox of Risk Management: A Supply Management Practice Perspective

  • Sudipa SarkerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Supply Chain Management book series (SSSCM, volume 7)

Abstract

How are risks managed in organizations? A conformist answer to this question is that all the plausible risks are first identified, then assessed and finally mitigated or treated. Grounded on a single in-depth case study of a leading global manufacturing organization and anchored in David Whetten’s framework for theoretical contributions, this chapter reveals that risk management in practice is not as holistic, single-level and time-independent activity as it is presumed to be in the theory and widely referred to standards. The findings suggest that different risks are managed using a multitude of methods during diverse activities within the supply management process by different personnel positioned at various hierarchical levels of the organization. Consequently, this paper contributes to an alternative understanding of risk management, referred to as the paradox of risk management which is a fragmented, multilevel and time-dependent process. Though this chapter draws on a single case of a large global organization and reveals risk management from the supply management practice perspective, the results may plausibly be valid for other large organizations operating in the supply chain context. As a result, this paper is expected to support the research community in developing practically rational models as well as provide assistance to managers of large complex organizations in forming a holistic understanding of supply chain risk management.

Keywords

Supply risk management Supply chain risk management Supplier risk Empirical study 

References

  1. Asbjørnslett, B. E. (2008). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk (pp. 15–33). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Benbasat, I. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems case research. MIS Quarterly, 3(3), 369–386.Google Scholar
  3. Cagliano, A. C., De Marco, A., Grimaldi, S., & Rafele, C. (2012). An integrated approach to supply chain risk analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 15(7), 817–840.Google Scholar
  4. Canbolat, Y. B., Gupta, G., Matera, S., & Chelst, K. (2007). Analysing risk in sourcing design and manufacture of components and sub-systems to emerging markets. International Journal of Production Research, 46(18), 5145–5164.Google Scholar
  5. Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.Google Scholar
  6. Christopher, M., Peck, H., Rutherford, C., & Jüttner, U. (2003). Understanding supply chain risk: A self-assessment workbook. Cranfield University: Department for Transport.Google Scholar
  7. Dani, S., & Ranganathan, R. (2008). Agility and supply chain uncertainty: A scenario planning perspective. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 3(3/4), 178–191.Google Scholar
  8. Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational complexity. In International encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 5013–5022).Google Scholar
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
  10. Ellegaard, C. (2008). Supply risk management in a small company perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 425–434.Google Scholar
  11. Fraser, J. P., Leenders, M. R., & Flynn, E. A. (2011). Purchasing and supply management. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Ganguly, K. K., & Guin, K. K. (2011). understanding supply risk in supply chain: A fuzzy framework. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 8(3), 267–283.Google Scholar
  13. Ghadge, A., Dani, S., & Kalawsky, R. (2012). Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 313–339.Google Scholar
  14. Griffis, S. E., & Whipple, J. M. (2012). A comprehensive risk assessment and evaluation model: proposing a risk priority continuum. Transportation Journal, 51(4), 428–451.Google Scholar
  15. Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2014). A model to evaluate upstream vulnerability. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 17(3), 249–268.Google Scholar
  16. Hallikas, J., Puumalainen, K., Vesterinen, T., & Virolainen, V.-M. (2005). Risk-based classification of supplier relationships. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 11(2–3), 72–82.Google Scholar
  17. Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 7543(September), 1–39.Google Scholar
  18. ISO. (2009). ISO 31000:2009—Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines, 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Kayis, B., & Karningsih, P. D. (2012). SCRIS: A knowledge-based system tool for assisting manufacturing organizations in identifying supply chain risks. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(7), 834–852.Google Scholar
  20. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109–117.Google Scholar
  21. Kumar, S., Boice, B. C., & Shepherd, M. J. (2013). Risk assessment and operational approaches to manage risk in global supply chains. Transportation Journal, 52(3), 391–411.Google Scholar
  22. Li, J., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2010). Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 137–150.Google Scholar
  23. Lockamy, A. I., & McCormack, K. (2012). Modeling supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 313–333.Google Scholar
  24. Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223.Google Scholar
  25. Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 434–456.Google Scholar
  26. Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000:2009—Setting a new standard for risk management. Risk Analysis, 30(6), 881–886.Google Scholar
  27. Radivojević, G., & Gajović, V. (2014). Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and fuzzy AHP methods. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 337–352.Google Scholar
  28. Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45–63.Google Scholar
  29. Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). an emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. The Journal of Operational Reseach Society, 58(11), 1398–1411.Google Scholar
  30. Ruiz-Torres, A. J., & Mahmoodi, F. (2007). The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures. Omega, 35(1), 104–115.Google Scholar
  31. Singhal, P., Agarwal, G., & Lal Mittal, M. (2011). Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 6(3), 15–42.Google Scholar
  32. Sodhi, M. S., Son, B.-G., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  33. Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.Google Scholar
  34. Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474–483.Google Scholar
  35. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490.Google Scholar
  36. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). California: Sage Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). A grounded definition of supply Risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5–6), 217–224.Google Scholar
  38. Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(2), 15–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Production EngineeringBangladesh University of Engineering and TechnologyDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations