Advertisement

The Management of Disruption Supply Risks at Vestas Wind Systems

  • Chris EllegaardEmail author
  • Anne Høj Schibsbye
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Supply Chain Management book series (SSSCM, volume 7)

Abstract

Supply risk management is a key strategic task for Vestas Wind Systems A/S (Vestas), who designs, produces, installs, and services wind turbines for customers in the global green energy market. One type of supply risk that draws much Vestas’ attention is disruption risk, which covers a range of different disruption events, driven by different sets of risk drivers and requires different combinations of risk management strategies. In this chapter, we analyze the three Vestas purchases of gearboxes, towers, and electronics and show how different sets of strategies are required for the successful mitigation of these risks. Based on this analysis, we propose a simple supply risk management framework, which can help managers mitigate disruption risk. The literature tends to treat disruptions as events that can be dealt with by the same generic set of strategies. In this chapter, we show that effective disruption mitigation may require very different strategies depending on the type of supply and the varied drivers causing the disruption.

References

  1. Blackhurst, J., Craighead, C. W., Elkins, D., & Handfield, R. B. (2005). An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43(19), 4067–4081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bode, C., Wagner, S. M., Petersen, K. J., & Ellram, L. M. (2011). Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 833–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 53–61.Google Scholar
  4. Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2014). Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 72–80.Google Scholar
  5. Craighead, C., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M., & Handfield, R. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellegaard, C. (2008). Supply risk management in a small company perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, S. C., Shockley, J., & Henry, R. M. (2011). Making sense of supply disruption risk research: A conceptual framework grounded in enactment theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, April, 65–96.Google Scholar
  8. Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reichenbachs, M., Schiele, H., & Hoffman, P. (2017). Strategic supply risk: Exploring the risks deriving from a buying firm being of low importance for its suppliers. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 20(4), 350–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(11), 1398–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. A. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Summer, 15–27.Google Scholar
  14. Zsidisin, G. A., & Wagner, S. (2010). Do perceptions become reality? The moderating role of supply chain resiliency on disruption occurrence. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Electrical, Global Procurement, Vestas Wind Systems A/SAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations