Advertisement

Hamlet’s Tears

  • Dympna CallaghanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Shakespeare Studies book series (PASHST)

Abstract

This essay begins by asking whether the grieving Hamlet weeps when he makes his wish ‘that this too, too sullied flesh would melt / Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew’ (1.2.133–134). Cognizant of the fact that critics are more often concerned with whether Hamlet actually says ‘sullied’, ‘sallied’, ‘solid’, or ‘grieved and sallied’ than whether or not he sheds tears as he says it, this essay argues nonetheless that Hamlet expresses not just a death wish in the first soliloquy—a temptation to suicide—, but also that he actively seeks Ovidian transformation in the form of a watery metamorphosis. Indeed, the desire to weep becomes a powerful engine of tragic catharsis despite the period’s profound reservations about mourning.

Bibliography

  1. Bate, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Callaghan, Dympna. ‘Marlowe’s Last Poem: Elegiac Aesthetics and the Epitaph on Sir Roger Manwood’. In Marlowe the Craftsman: Lives, Stage and Page. Edited by Sarah K. Scott and M. L. Stapleton. New York: Routledge, 2010, 159–177.Google Scholar
  3. Callaghan, Dympna. Hamlet: Language and Writing. The Arden Shakespeare. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clapp, Susannah. ‘The Ten Best Hamlets’. The Guardian. Saturday 21 August 2010. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2010/aug/22/10-best-hamlets-david-tennant.
  5. Donne, John. John Donne: The Major Works. Edited by John Carey. Oxford World’s Classics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. Döring, Tobias. Performances of Mourning in Shakespearean Theatre and Early Modern Culture. New York: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enterline, Lynn. The Tears of Narcissus: Melancholia and Masculinity in Early Modern Writing. Stanford, CA: University of Stanford Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Goodland, Katharine. Female Mourning and Tragedy in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama: From the Raising of Lazarus to King Lear. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grazia, Margreta de. Hamlet Without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Greenblatt, Stephen. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Hillman, David. Shakespeare’s Entrails: Belief, Scepticism and the Interior of the Body. New York: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Houlbrooke, Ralph. Death, Religion and the Family in England, 1480–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Howard, Jean E. ‘Monarchs Who Cry: The Gendered Politics of Weeping in the English History Play’. In A Feminist Companion to Shakespeare. 2nd ed. Edited by Dympna Callaghan. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016, 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, Ernest. ‘The Oedipus Complex as Explanation of Hamlet’s Mystery: A Study in Motive’. The American Journal of Psychology 21 (1910): 72–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kern Paster, Gail. The Body Embarrassed: Drama and the Disciplines of Shame in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Lutz, Tom. Crying: The Natural and Cultural History of Tears. New York: W. W. Norton, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Miola, Robert S. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Montaigne, Michel de. ‘Of the Resemblance Between Children and Fathers’. In The Essayes or Morall, Politike and Millitarie Discourses: Of Lo: Michaell de Montaigne. Translated by John Florio. London, 1603.Google Scholar
  19. Morse, Ruth. ‘Shakespeare’s Depriving Particles’. Shakespeare Survey 70 (2017): 207–212.Google Scholar
  20. Neill, Michael. Issues of Death. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  21. Neill, Michael. ‘English Revenge Tragedy’. In A Companion to Tragedy. Edited by Rebecca Bushnell. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, 328–350.Google Scholar
  22. Nussbaum, Martha C. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Ovid. Metamorphoses. Translated by Frank Justus Miller. Revised G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library. 3rd ed. Books 1–8. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. Ovid. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: The Arthur Golding Translation of 1567. Edited by John Frederick Nims. Philadelphia, PA: Paul Dry Books, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Ovid. Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Translated by Charles Martin. New York: W. W. Norton, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Oxford English Dictionary Online. June 2017. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com.
  27. Phillippy, Patricia. Women, Death and Literature in Post-Reformation England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  28. Pollard, Tanya. ‘What’s Hecuba to Shakespeare?’. Renaissance Quarterly 65, no. 4 (2012): 1060–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roche, Mark W. ‘The Greatness and Limits of Hegel’s Theory of Tragedy’. In A Companion to Tragedy. Edited by Rebecca Bushnell. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, 51–67.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, John. Hamlet and Narcissus. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  31. Sacks, Peter. The English Elegy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  32. Schiesari, Juliana. The Gendering of Melancholia: Feminism, Psychoanalysis, and the Symbolics of Loss in Renaissance Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  33. Scribonis, Wilhelm. Naturall Philosophy, or, A Description of the World, Namely, of Angels, of Man, of the Heavens, of the Ayre, of the Earth, of the Water and of the Creatures in the Whole World. Translated by Daniel Widdowes. London, 1621.Google Scholar
  34. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: The Arden Shakespeare. Edited by Harold Jenkins. London: Methuen, 1982.Google Scholar
  35. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: Prince of Denmark. Edited by Philip Edwards. Updated ed., The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  36. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623. Arden Shakespeare Third Series. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Methuen, 2007.Google Scholar
  37. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: A Norton Critical Edition. Edited by Robert Miola. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
  38. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Arden Shakespeare Third Series. 2nd ed. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar
  39. Shakespeare, William. The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works. 2 Volumes. General Edited by Gary Taylor, John Jowett, Terri Bourus, and Gabriel Egan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  40. Shirilan, Stephanie. Robert Burton and the Transformative Powers of Melancholy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
  41. Spargo, R. Clifton. The Ethics of Mourning: Grief and Responsibility in Elegiac Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  42. Thorne, Alison. ‘“O, Lawful Let It Be/That I Have Room … To Curse Awhile”: Voicing the Nation’s Conscience in Female Complaint in Richard III, King John, and Henry VIII’. In This England, That Shakespeare. Edited by Willy Maley and Margaret Tudeau-Clayton. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
  43. Urkowitz, Steven. ‘Back to Basics: Thinking About the Hamlet First Published’. In The Hamlet First Published (Q1, 1603). Edited by Thomas Clayton. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992, 257–291.Google Scholar
  44. Vaught, Jennifer C. Masculinity and Emotion in Early Modern English Literature. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
  45. White, R. S. ‘Ophelia’s Sisters’. In The Impact of Feminism in English Renaissance Studies. Edited by Dympna Callaghan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, 93–113.Google Scholar
  46. White, R. S. Avant-Garde Hamlet: Text, Stage, Screen. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations