Advertisement

Hamlet and Tragic Emotion

  • Indira GhoseEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Shakespeare Studies book series (PASHST)

Abstract

This essay looks at how Hamlet investigates the role of the theatre, and specifically tragedy, in eliciting emotional response. I will focus on two instances in which the play engages with theatrical art—Hamlet’s response to the First Player’s speech, and the court reaction to The Mousetrap. One of the issues that Shakespeare explores in a play riddled with questions is: does tragedy make anything happen? Both defenders and detractors of the theatre postulate that tragedy has a univocal effect on its spectators. Shakespeare, I argue, is more sceptical, and points to the indeterminacy of art and the contingency of audience response.

Bibliography

  1. Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Stephen Halliwell. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by George A. Kennedy. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. On the Soul. Translated by W. S. Hett. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  5. A Warning for Faire Women. London, 1599.Google Scholar
  6. Burrow, Colin. Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Callaghan, Dympna. Hamlet: Language and Writing. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicero. On the Ideal Orator. Translated by James M. May and Jacob Wisse. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Curran, Kevin. ‘Hamlet’s Unreasonable Judgements’. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  10. Enterline, Lynn. Shakespeare’s Schoolroom: Rhetoric, Discipline, Emotion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  11. Fortenbaugh, W. W. Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology, Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics and Ethics. London: Duckworth, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. Geertz, Clifford. ‘Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight’. In The Interpretation of Cultures, 435–473. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Ghose, Indira. ‘Shakespeare’s Legacy of Storytelling’. In Shakespeare’s Creative Legacies: Artists, Writers, Performers and Critics, edited by Paul Edmondson and Peter Holbrook, 165–177. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Heywood, Thomas. Apology for Actors. London, 1612.Google Scholar
  15. Hoeniger, F. David. Medicine and Shakespeare in the English Renaissance. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Horace. Ars Poetica. Translated by H. R. Fairclough. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, Emrys. The Origins of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  18. Kastan, David Scott. ‘“His Semblable is His Mirror”: Hamlet and the Imitation of Revenge’, Shakespeare Studies 19 (1988): 111–124.Google Scholar
  19. Konstan, David. ‘Rhetoric and Emotion’. In A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Ian Worthington. Oxford: Blackwell, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, Rhodri. Hamlet and the Vision of Darkness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  21. Marlowe, Christopher, and Thomas Nashe. ‘Dido, Queen of Carthage’. In The Complete Plays, edited by Frank Romany and Robert Lindsey. London: Penguin Books, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. Nietzsche, Friedrich. ‘Morgenröte’ [The Dawn of Day]’. In Werke in drei Bände, edited by Karl Schlechta, Vol. 1. München: Hanser, 1954.Google Scholar
  23. Nussbaum, Martha C. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Nuttall, A. D. Why Does Tragedy Give Pleasure? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  25. Plato. The Republic. Translated by Desmond Lee. London: Penguin Books, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. Plutarch. The lives of the noble Grecians and Romanes. Translated by Thomas North. London, 1579.Google Scholar
  27. Plutarch. The Philosophie, commonlie called, the Morals, written by the learned Philosopher Plutarch of Chaeronea. Translated by Philemon Holland. London, 1603.Google Scholar
  28. Quintilian. The Orator’s Education. Translated by Donald A. Russell. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. Roach, Joseph R. The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  30. Seneca. The Seconde Tragedie of Seneca entituled Thyestes. Translated by Jasper Heywood. London, 1560.Google Scholar
  31. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. The Arden Shakespeare. London: Thomson Learning, 2006.Google Scholar
  32. Sidney, Sir Philip. A Defence of Poesy. Edited by J. A. Van Dorsten. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, Quentin. Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  34. van Es, Bart. Shakespeare in Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  35. Vickers, Brian. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  36. Vickers, Brian. ‘Rhetoric and Poetics’. In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Edited by Charles B. Schmitt and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 715–745.Google Scholar
  37. Virgil. Aeneid. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough, rev. G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of FribourgSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations