Incorporating Youth Voice into Services for Young People Experiencing Homelessness
Homeless youth are typically served through a traditional service system that provides important basic needs but tends to be limited in scope, deficit-based, and adult-led, creating challenges for engaging youth in making real change in their lives. In contrast, a youth voice approach emphasizes building relationships with youth, holistically and as respected partners in services. Several different practice frameworks may help homeless service providers integrate youth voice into their programming. A positive youth development (PYD) approach aims to build assets in young people, often by empowering them through skill building, team-based activities, and projects. Empowerment practice has emerged as a way to promote youth agency and leadership. And, recently, a trauma-informed lens has permeated many homeless youth services. This chapter describes these three frameworks, outlines how such frameworks can lead to the empowerment of marginalized youths’ voices, and reviews the most recent literature on empowerment programming with homeless youth. The chapter concludes that providing services to young people experiencing homelessness through a lens of youth voice is likely to help youth strengthen social networks while building individual skills useful in exiting the streets.
KeywordsHomeless youth Empowerment Positive youth development Homeless services Youth voice Empowerment theory Services Youth participatory action research Resilience Shelter Transitional housing Trauma Social justice Trauma-informed care Self-efficacy Power sharing Safety Supportive relationships Skill building Positive social norms Protective factors Rick factors Trauma awareness Consumer choice Strengths-based approach
- 76 Fed. Reg. 233 (2011). Rules and regulations. Federal Register: The Daily Journal of the United States. https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/HEARTH_HomelessDefinition_FinalRule.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2018.
- Bender, K., Ferguson, K., Thompson, S., Komlo, C., & Pollio, D. (2010). Factors associated with trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder among homeless youth in three U.S. cities: The importance of transience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(1), 161–168.Google Scholar
- Bender, K., Barman-Adhikari, A., DeChants, J., Haffejee, B., Anyon, Y., Begun, S., Portillo, A., & Dunn, K. (2017). Asking for change: Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a manualized photovoice intervention with youth experiencing homelessness. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 379–389.Google Scholar
- Bender, K., Begun, S., Dunn, K., MacKay, E., & DeChants, J. (2018). Homeless youths’ interests in social action via photovoice. Journal of Community Practice, 26(1), 107–120.Google Scholar
- Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma, A. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and applications. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 894–941). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2010). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Greenblatt, M., & Robertson, M. J. (1993). Life-styles, adaptive strategies, and sexual behaviors of homeless adolescents. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44(12), 1177–1180.Google Scholar
- Hammer, H., Finkelhor, D., & Sedlak, A. J. (2002). Runaway/thrownaway children: National estimates and characteristics (NCJ 196469). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
- Jelicic, H., Bobek, D. L., Phelps, E., Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2007). Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: Findings from the first two waves of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(3), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Larkin, M., Cierpial, C., Stack, J., Morrison, V., & Griffith, C. (2008). Empowerment theory in action: The wisdom of collaborative governance. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(2), 2–2.Google Scholar
- Leonard, N. R., Freeman, R., Ritchie, A. S., Gwadz, M. V., Tabac, L., Dickson, V. V., Cleland, C. M., Bolas, J., & Hirsh, M. (2017). “Coming from the place of walking with the youth—That feeds everything”: A mixed methods case study of a runaway and homeless youth organization. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 34(5), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCay, E., Langley, J., Beanlands, H., Cooper, L., Mudachi, N., Harris, A., Blidner, R., Bach, K., Dart, C., Howes, C., & Miner, S. (2010). Mental health challenges and strengths of street-involved youth: The need for a multi-determined approach. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 42(3), 30–49.Google Scholar
- McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, Re-Authorized. (2002). 42 U.S.C. 11431 et seq 725.Google Scholar
- Weikart, D. P. (2012) Youth program quality assessment. Center for Youth Program Quality. http://www.cypq.org/assessment. Accessed 27 July 2018.