Advertisement

Signal Design for Multi-input System Identification

  • Ai Hui TanEmail author
  • Keith Richard Godfrey
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

For the identification of multi-input systems, the utilisation of sets of signals which are uncorrelated with one another allows the effects of the individual inputs to be easily decoupled at the system output. The theory behind the design of sets of uncorrelated signals is explained. This includes Hadamard-modulated signals and signals with a zippered spectrum. The latter may be designed using multisine signals or pseudorandom signals. An application example on a simulated thermoelectric system is presented. An alternative approach using the phase-shifting design is then described. In this approach only one signal is generated and phase-shifted versions of this signal are applied to the multiple inputs. Finally, the identification of ill-conditioned processes is discussed. The problem of ill-conditioning is caused by the singular values having widely differing magnitudes. The method of virtual transfer function between inputs for the identification of ill-conditioned systems is explained. Its effectiveness is illustrated on a simulated multizone furnace.

References

  1. Barker HA, Tan AH, Godfrey KR (2014) Object-oriented creation of input signals for system identification. IET Control Theory Appl 8:821–829MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briggs PAN, Godfrey KR (1966) Pseudorandom signals for the dynamic analysis of multivariable systems. Proc Inst Electr Eng 113:1259–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briggs PAN, Godfrey KR (1976) Design of uncorrelated signals. Electron Lett 12:555–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruwer M-J, MacGregor JF (2006) Robust multi-variable identification: optimal experimental design with constraints. J Process Control 16:581–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chin CS, Munro N (2003) Control of the ALSTOM gasifier benchmark problem using H2 methodology. J Process Control 13:759–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conner JS, Seborg DE (2004) An evaluation of MIMO input designs for process identification. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:3847–3854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darby ML, Nikolaou M (2014) Identification test design for multivariable model-based control: an industrial perspective. Control Eng Pract 22:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacobsen EW, Lundström P, Skogestad S (1991) Modelling and identification for robust control of ill-conditioned plants—a distillation case study. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, Boston, MA, 26–28 June, pp 242–248Google Scholar
  9. Jin Q, Wang Z, Wang Q, Yang R (2013) Optimal input design for identifying parameters and orders of MIMO systems with initial values. Appl Math Comput 224:735–742MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Jin Q, Wang Z, Yang R, Wang J (2014) An effective direct closed loop identification method for linear multivariable systems with colored noise. J Process Control 24:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaigala GV, Jiang J, Backhouse CJ, Marquez HJ (2010) System design and modeling of a time-varying, nonlinear temperature controller for microfluidics. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 18:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kollár I (1994) Frequency domain system identification toolbox for use with MATLAB. The MathWorks Inc., NatickGoogle Scholar
  13. Li W, Lee JH (1996) Control relevant identification of ill-conditioned systems: estimation of gain directionality. Comput Chem Eng 20:1023–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ljung L, Singh R (2012) Version 8 of the system identification toolbox. IFAC Proc Vol 45:1826–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacWilliams J (1967) An example of two cyclically orthogonal sequences with maximum period. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 13:338–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martín CA, Rivera DE, Hekler EB (2016) An enhanced identification test monitoring procedure for MIMO systems relying on uncertainty estimates. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, Las Vegas, NV, 12–14 December, pp 2091–2096Google Scholar
  17. Misra S, Nikolaou M (2017) Adaptive design of experiments for model order estimation in subspace identification. Comput Chem Eng 100:119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rasmussen KH, Jørgensen SB (1999) Parametric uncertainty modelling for robust control: a link to identification. Comput Chem Eng 23:987–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rivera DE, Lee H, Mittelmann HD, Braun M (2009) Constrained multisine input signals for plant-friendly identification of chemical process systems. J Process Control 19:623–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roinila T, Huusari J, Vilkko M (2013) On frequency-response measurements of power-electronic systems applying MIMO identification techniques. IEEE Trans Indust Electron 60:5270–5276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roinila T, Messo T, Santi E (2018) MIMO-identification techniques for rapid impedance-based stability assessment of three-phase systems in DQ domain. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33:4015–4022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tan AH, Yap TTV (2012) Signal design for the identification of multivariable ill-conditioned systems using virtual transfer function between inputs. IET Control Theory Appl 6:394–402MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tan AH, Godfrey KR, Barker HA (2009) Design of ternary signals for MIMO identification in the presence of noise and nonlinear distortion. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 17:926–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tan AH, Barker HA, Godfrey KR (2015) Identification of multi-input systems using simultaneous perturbation by pseudorandom input signals. IET Control Theory Appl 9:2283–2292MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waller JB, Böling JM (2005) Multi-variable nonlinear MPC of an ill-conditioned distillation column. J Process Control 15:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yap TTV, Tan AH (2011) Identification of the static characteristics of a multizone furnace. In: Proceedings of the international conference on electrical, control and computer engineering, Kuantan, Malaysia, 21–22 June, pp 39–44Google Scholar
  27. Yap TTV, Tan AH, Tan WN (2017) Identification of higher-dimensional ill-conditioned systems using extensions of virtual transfer function between inputs. J Process Control 56:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu Y, Stec P (2006) Simple control-relevant identification test methods for a class of ill-conditioned processes. J Process Control 16:1113–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations